|
GUI wallet crashes on initial setup at the "create password" prompt. Really don't have the motivation to give the CLI wallet a try.
|
|
|
|
|
Need to sell my tennet. If anyone is interested PM me. I'd rather sell it OTC instead of placing a sellwall.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks koshgel.
Still have two left, for anyone out there who's interested.
|
|
|
|
Offer: $30 in BTC for $50 card and $12 in BTC for $20 card
Deal. Seeing your trust rating, I'll go first. please confirm via PM |
|
|
|
|
Currently waiting to finalize the deal with an interested party, still available though, first come first serve.
|
|
|
|
droping the price to 0.3  |
|
|
|
|
One $50 Xbox Gift Card One $20 Xbox Gift Card One 3-Month Xbox Live Gold.
preferably the three in one go for .36btc
|
|
|
|
As long as they don't come back and say they are busy simulating user-populated geo-clusters in matlab I think maybe there is a small amount of hope. But I have this sinking feeling they are simulating user-populated geo-clusters.
subtle. |
|
|
|
|
With the devs delivering either of the 3 apps or at least showing some progress, this will be an instant 5X profit and then, with some followup progress, 100X very doable.
One thing is for sure, they suck at PR but I'm betting on their MIT caliber brains - if they deliver. High risk / extremely sweet reward.
|
|
|
|
while going through my morning coffee I decided to do a little research. BitCompThis fall, every MIT undergrad will receive $100 in Bitcoin What will you build to inspire your fellow students?Topic Prizes For the final round we will have $1,500 Topic Prizes, which are as follows: Improving MIT Award: Application or service with most potential for improving some aspect of student life at MIT Engineering Award: Application or service that features impressive engineering or that is effective in demonstrating the capabilities of Bitcoin. Evangelism Award: Best application or service for introducing new users to Bitcoin ----------- My guess is that they're going for this one here with 'Intelliapp' Next Billion Award: Application or service that best addresses challenges in developing nations Awesome Award: Application, service, or project that’s just plain cool, fun, or creative Some links MIT BitComp Competition website: http://bitcoin.mit.edu/mit-bitcoin-projects-bitcomp/Facebook group for the competition: https://www.facebook.com/groups/mitbitcomp/ -------- If you remember one of the dev's name, you'll find her as a member in that group. We already know from the MIT web admin that they started this as a summer project...... About the github: If I were to start a coin, I wouldn't write the basic code from scratch, I'd outsource the 'chassis' and write my proposed innovation on top of that. Excuse my analogy, I don't know the first thing about coding! Half Empty or Half Full - It is up to you. Me? I'll go for Half Full  |
|
|
|
|
That news is from back in April.
|
|
|
|
|
<void_username> and if you refund all 12 will still want to ICO with you
<mothermole1> haha
<Somekindabitcoin> I did nazi dat coming
<•bittrex-richie> void_username: maybe... maybe not... its hard to predict... i do know that a lot of the bigger players want us to hold up our end of the agreement
Pressure from the big players is all it takes, just like IRL... a lot of money at stake, money going directly into big pockets to fatten the load. I wonder who those big players are.
Two things are confirmed:
A crook dev: All the evidence is there, ips, accounts, ICO_DUDE aka "dev" rooting for the dev and with an active offer to buy more accounts. Can't provide proof of development, can't tweet from "his" twitter. Doesn't post on any thread but magically posts to his defense on the thread were it is confirmed to the same ips. etc etc etc. You didn't deliver anything, you won't lose anything. why do you insist on getting the btc?
ICO buyers: Yes it is our fault to buy the coins on a reputable exchange after doing our research (or not), thinking they wouldn't deal with scammers and them having more resources to filter what coins they list. Yes, but the USE fiasco happened. That is new evidence.
There is no legal agreement. This is down to ethics and what is morally right; hurting the very people that support you and helping a criminal get away with it while you still take your profits, or not.
It is common knowledge that there is indirectly a lot or money to be made from scammers and scammed victims, just like attorneys, there is a lot to be made from defending criminals by playing the system.
Facilitating scams is profitable, no doubt; hey! you're not breaking any laws apparently.
ICO buyers took the usual risks but had no way of knowing who excatly they were dealing with if the USE scam had not happened the same day on your very exchange. It is new concrete evidence, give it to the red cross or to your favorite charity or destroy the coins, I don't care. But do not give this crook more tools to keep on screwing the industry that feeds your "side project"
|
|
|
|
|
<void_username> and if you refund all 12 will still want to ICO with you
<mothermole1> haha
<Somekindabitcoin> I did nazi dat coming
<•bittrex-richie> void_username: maybe... maybe not... its hard to predict... i do know that a lot of the bigger players want us to hold up our end of the agreement
Pressure from the big players is all it takes, just like IRL... a lot of money at stake, money going directly into big pockets to fatten the load. I wonder who those big players are.
Two things are confirmed:
A crook dev: All the evidence is there, ips, accounts, ICO_DUDE aka "dev" rooting for the dev and with an active offer to buy more accounts. Can't provide proof of development, can't tweet from "his" twitter. Doesn't post on any thread but magically posts to his defense on the thread were it is confirmed to the same ips. etc etc etc. You didn't deliver anything, you won't lose anything. why do you insist on getting the btc?
ICO buyers: Yes it is our fault to buy the coins on a reputable exchange after doing our research (or not), thinking they wouldn't deal with scammers and them having more resources to filter what coins they list. Yes, but the USE fiasco happened. That is new evidence.
There is no legal agreement. This is down to ethics and what is morally right; hurting the very people that support you and helping a criminal get away with it while you still take your profits, or not.
It is common knowledge that there is indirectly a lot or money to be made from scammers and scammed victims, just like attorneys, there is a lot to be made from defending criminals by playing the system.
Facilitating scams is profitable, no doubt; hey! you're not breaking any laws apparently.
ICO buyers took the usual risks but had no way of knowing who excatly they were dealing with if the USE scam had not happened the same day on your very exchange. It is new concrete evidence, give it to the red cross or to your favorite charity or destroy the coins, I don't care. But do not give this crook more tools to keep on screwing the industry that feeds your "side project"
|
|
|
|
|
The ICO terms are irrelevant in these accusations.
The fact that it is the same "DEV" as the USE "DEV" is where the root of the imminent scam lies. Nevermind the terms, the fact that this person makes his living out of scamming people out of their BTC and Bittrex having the power to kill one of cryptos deadliest cancers is what we should be looking at, do not deviate with "ICO terms arguments".
You want irrefutable proof to act? there is none and there will never be one for the Carsens, the ASIACOINS, the list goes on and on, unless they themselves say they did it, it is impossible, this is the internet, the evidence is right there, served to you on a silver plattter WORK WITH WHAT YOU GOT! BITTREX: DO THE RIGHT THING!
|
|
|
|
|
From their About Us:
Richie Lai
"Richie is currently the manager of the Amazon Security Operations Center and is in charge of security response and operations for Amazon. Prior to that, he spent 12 years at Microsoft building up their security engineering and internet crimes division. His background in application and network security, internet crimes and malware makes him the most paranoid person at protecting his and your crypto currencies. "
Though not a security breach, it is still an internet crime, a huge one, performed through your systems and you are profiting from it, if CLSTR / Cluster is not an internet crime then what is? 350btc form CLSTR and ~50 from USE, that is around 1/5 of a Million dollars!!
Don't kill your company ffs!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
