hi all,
does anyone know what is current exchange rate for each MMC?
tks
|
|
|
btc or ltc is different since they're the first one release on the market. i mean they are not clone from anyone else. but mmc and dtc are different, they inherit (clone) all from other coins, like primecoin or protoshares, u know what i mean? // so last post, not getting off-topic more
|
|
|
just turn of all cloud VMs, leaving 2 instances, not expect to have prize, just for luck // can someone update current exchange/escrow rate to btc?
|
|
|
...and bots. One guy hitting a block every 20 minutes, he's at 10,000 MMC now.
This ^^ Why? I have been mining for 3 days on 2 systems with ZERO luck Don't bother with this coin until the questions are answered. or may he has his own miner, who know
|
|
|
.....yeah the miner for dtc has just release few weeks ago, not at the time the coin released, just like mmc now. // i'm a not developer, so writing thing is not familiar with me.
|
|
|
like i said in few previous page, these kind of coins (include datacoin) are made to make profit for its owner and developers who know how to write the miner and keep the miner for them-self only and only public after diff are skyrocket.
|
|
|
It would probably take more than 24 hours to get to block 750; with more and more people simply giving up on mining before reaching this block.
give up! cannot play with luck since i have to pay the bill too
|
|
|
I don't know but I think that this software is not working well. Nearly every time i start the application I need to rebuild the block index. Why? Furthermore it just does not stay synchronized. Although it is showing 8 Active Connections and everything seems to be OK, it doesnt keep up with the blocks found! That's a major problem and doesnt happen with other clients!
agree, the client it-self does not stable at all.
|
|
|
tterminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::thread_resource_error> >' what(): boost::thread_resource_error: Resource temporarily unavailable
does anyone getting this error in the deamon?
|
|
|
the crash seem more frequently, i'll patient to try few more hours, but this is totally wasted.
|
|
|
to tired with crashing every 1h
|
|
|
I have two quick q's: 1) I have downloaded and am using the 0.8.53 version and have 3 active connections. But it's been over 20 minutes and it is still calculating the hash rate. In addition, when I go to the console and getmininginfo, nothing happens, I get no response. Is it mining? Any ideas why I can't get the console information? Did u run "setgenerate true 4" (or 8, 16, 32)? You can check the cpu usage to make sure it hit 99-100% 2) In General, what's the difference between the 4 processes and 8 processes? Does it affect the hash rate? 8 is faster? Any reason not to use 8 processes? (OK, that's 3 questions in one ) The more processe (cpu core) you have the fast mining you will get.Cheers!
|
|
|
never mind, just re-download from the .org one, it has 8.5.3 verison.
|
|
|
hi guys, where can i get the windows build for verson 8.5.3? the file on memorycoin.info and on google drive at page still 8.5.2
Thanks
|
|
|
that's unnecessary. I've found that the problem is exacerbated by the number of threads being used; perhaps he's only using 2 or 4 cores and therefore hasn't hit a hard limit yet?
I ended up just writing a script to restart the daemon if (when) cpu drops below a certain threshold, indicating the process has crashed... hacky, but good enough for now.
radiumsoup, can you share that script? appriciate
|
|
|
Delete the "rpcthreads" setting and use only the "genproclimit". It's the onlyone solution for now
try both last night, still got crash , now will try only genproclimit. Any other suggestions?
|
|
|
ok will update the config and restart the deamon see if it works.
thanks Fa
|
|
|
Ok finally clean.
Set the "rpcthreads" = number of CPUs and set the "genproclimit" = the same value.
To me still to work fine from more of one hour.
FaSan
Hi Fa, is that number of CPUs or number of core because genproclimit usually set to number of cores, not # of CPUs
|
|
|
|