|
61
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: mmpool.org - 1.5% fee DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mine/tor
|
on: September 30, 2016, 01:46:18 AM
|
Payment was delayed because I didn't get notification of the block by the pool. I see it's showing one as being found but I'm not seeing it - block 431998 is showing as relayed by slush and the coinbase has slush's signature. I'm investigating and hope to have something to report in a couple of hours. |
|
|
|
|
67
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: mmpool.org - 1.5% fee DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mine/tor
|
on: August 29, 2016, 01:29:56 AM
|
Can we get UNO back online??
@Mmpool, let me know the address and I'll gladly send some Uno to help pad payouts.
But I really would love to see UNO mining turned back on.
I'll send 70ths as soon as it's back online.
Looking forward to sending over the padded UNO reward and the hash. If you send some UNO to ufefNCLet4norNwAqw39mrAJMrBGLPaCuG I'll re-enable distribution of UNO funds until it runs out. It's not lack of desire that's stopping UNO from being enabled, it's technical issues for all alt coins at the moment. |
|
|
|
|
69
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: mmpool.org - 1.5% fee DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mine/tor
|
on: July 10, 2016, 10:16:07 AM
|
|
The PPS portion of the pool reward (previously 2 BTC out of the 25 BTC) has been dropped to zero and the DGM portion of the reward set at 12.5 following the halvening. I'll reinstate the PPS reward at a lower level after some fixes related to the halvening. The issue is having to increase some significant figures for calculations in areas of the code to account for the sub-satoshi level of some PPS rewards now that things are halved.
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: mmpool.org - 1.5% fee DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mine/tor
|
on: July 03, 2016, 07:02:03 AM
|
Thanks for that info mmpool - is there an ETA for when the EU server will be back online? Also, is merge mining operational now?
EU server will not be back online before the halvening. Merge mining is not yet operational. The switch to bitcoin 0.12 broke the method the pool used to do merge mining and I'm reimplementing that side of things. |
|
|
|
|
72
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: mmpool.org - 1.5% fee DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mine/tor
|
on: June 29, 2016, 10:45:58 PM
|
Where approximately are the mmpool servers located? I'm thinking of renting some hash, so would like to use miners that are closest if possible.
USA will get you the closest to the servers. I had one in europe too but it's currently down while I restructure the pool setup. |
|
|
|
|
73
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated
|
on: June 18, 2016, 10:59:56 PM
|
I've got a bunch of: In receiver.h, getIsSufficientAmount rejected the addresses or amounts.
For the given:
Height: 236766
Share: 4500000000000
Step: 4000
The expected addresses are:
The receiverMap shows that they should get 0 coins
The shares per address however are set to 4500000000000
13mtCyZTnMJRJw9nt7xqbiGU7tXrvkeAJB
The given addresses are:
1Emfox1WswYcd2YucUskRzqfRWKkcm1Jut
The given amounts are:
4500000000000
They started appearing in the last 24 hours. |
|
|
|
|
74
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: mmpool.org - 1.5% fee DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mine/tor
|
on: June 16, 2016, 12:55:42 PM
|
|
Merge mining is temporarily disabled while I work through some issues from a combination of the old daemons, the new bitcoind, and a move of servers. I'm continuing to pay out rewards for the coins while I have reserves. Syscoin is paused in the meantime as there are no reserves.
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated
|
on: June 15, 2016, 01:16:10 AM
|
Thanks, that's what I'm running. I get this error when starting devcoind: Downloading receiver_0.csv base file /tmp/.devcoin/receiver/receiver_0.csv
Number of pages in getCommonOutputByText: 5
Number of identical pages in getCommonOutputByText: 4
No coin addresses were found, there may be something wrong with the receiver_x.csv files.
It then fails to start. Looking at receiver.csv it shows the following mirrors: These all appear to be offline or 404. Where are receiver files these days? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
