I tried it, but now I get the same error at a different spot:
Is that a partial paste? Seems to be missing the first section. Cheers Graham Well after having issues with the VM as a whole I decided to create a new one using an older version of Ubuntu. That worked successfully, and I am syncing the wallet now. Thanks for your help! |
|
|
|
Hello, I have been trying to compile Zetacoin. I have overcome a few errors, but this one has been stumped. Any help? rpcrawtransaction.cpp:299:77: required from here
Here's a diff-generated patch that will fix that particular OS-related issue ... --- a/src/rpcrawtransaction.cpp
+++ b/src/rpcrawtransaction.cpp
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ Value listunspent(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
CTxDestination address;
if (ExtractDestination(pk, address))
{
- const CScriptID& hash = boost::get<const CScriptID&>(address);
+ const CScriptID& hash = boost::get<CScriptID>(address);
CScript redeemScript;
if (pwalletMain->GetCScript(hash, redeemScript))
entry.push_back(Pair("redeemScript", HexStr(redeemScript.begin(), redeemScript.end())));
HTH Cheers Graham * gjhiggins is too unfamiliar with C++ compiler/architecture variants to suggest a PR I tried it, but now I get the same error at a different spot: /usr/include/boost/variant/get.hpp:178:5: error: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type ‘boost::STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE<false>’
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT_MSG(
^
rpcrawtransaction.cpp:805:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
}
^
Makefile:837: recipe for target 'rpcrawtransaction.o' failed
make[3]: *** [rpcrawtransaction.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/brandon/zetacoin/src'
Makefile:859: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/brandon/zetacoin/src'
Makefile:651: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/brandon/zetacoin/src'
Makefile:508: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
|
|
|
|
Hello, I have been trying to compile Zetacoin. I have overcome a few errors, but this one has been stumped. Any help? rpcrawtransaction.cpp:299:77: required from here
/usr/include/boost/variant/get.hpp:178:5: error: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type ‘boost::STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE<false>’
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT_MSG(
^
Makefile:837: recipe for target 'rpcrawtransaction.o' failed
make[3]: *** [rpcrawtransaction.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/brandon/zetacoin/src'
Makefile:859: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/brandon/zetacoin/src'
Makefile:651: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/brandon/zetacoin/src'
Makefile:508: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
Any help would be appreciated. |
|
|
|
|
You can. But you will mine so little, a fraction of a fraction of a litecoin. Just don't.
|
|
|
|
Satoshi's identity is important.
For a start - Remaining anonymous is a big bump to their credibility. The person(s) acted and interacted publicly, collaborated with other people, and no one knows who they are or are keeping quiet about it. That's hard. Very hard. You need to know what you are doing to accomplish that. It also requires discipline and, likely, planning.
Secondly, the global implications. What if undeniable evidence breaks that points to a nation state? What if Mike Hearn is discovered to be Satoshi? GMaxwell? Etc.
Maybe even Vladimir Putin! |
|
|
|
I think this will continue, I am very optimistic that we will touch $500 at the end of 2015  More like $470 - 480, I presume. Let's not get our hopes too high, we all know people are gonna cash out if this keeps on going. I'm even happy if we are at $450 at the end of 2015 if it is able to be held stable. |
|
|
|
As sustainable as the temperature in summer guys  Can you elaborate on why you feel this way? |
|
|
|
How the hell would anyone here know?
Obviously it is all speculation. I'm looking for opinions I was just kidding. And pointing out that the guesses here are just that, guesses. Ah, okay no problem. That is a very good point tho. |
|
|
|
How the hell would anyone here know?
Obviously it is all speculation. I'm looking for opinions |
|
|
|
There isn't really any news to have an effect on bitcoin so I doubt that that's the reason of the bitcoin value going up.
I'm just happy that it's going up, I would be happy if it went either way though.
You don't think it's going up at least in part by the whole "Satoshi" hype? I would think it's bringing interest into bitcoin. |
|
|
|
|
I'll join in. I might be totally going against the current strategy, but lets see.
Re8
|
|
|
|
It may pull back a little here, but long-term, the rise is sustainable in my view.
This. More and more people realize block halving which BTC ll face in July next will permanently half BTC supply. This is gonna push BTC up big time and this price growth might easily generate snowball effect. Last big price jump over 1k was purely speculative. This one s different, it s based on actual supply and demand for crypto. It's not going to halve the bitcoin supply, rather it will be halving the block reward (i.e. bitcoin production.) The same Bitcoin amount will be produced, it will just take a longer time to produce it. |
|
|
|
There hasn't really been any news to cause this pump so I don't know if it's sustainable. I hope so. We'll soon find out though.
well the last pump reached 500, so i'm assuming we are just returning there, if bitcoin is waiting everytime good news to increase, then we will not have a high price ever anyway you need to move this on the specualtion board OP... Sorry. How do I do that? |
|
|
|
There hasn't really been any news to cause this pump so I don't know if it's sustainable. I hope so. We'll soon find out though.
I was referring to all the hype caused by "Satoshi" right now. It may be drawing interest and so more people are purchasing. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin has been on the rise, currently at $435. Is this a sustainable number, or is it a momentary spike because of the news?
|
|
|
|
this media stories suck because they are reveal the poor journalism that we have.
It is not journalism anymore it's more like storytelling and creating hype without actually checking clues. I feel that journalism nowadays works like this: 'Let's write some fabricated story, agitate the masses and never post any dementi if that turn out to be total bullshit'. It's sad when main stream media has articles with plainly false information because it sounds good. |
|
|
|
A problem? I don't see any problem. One guy's saying he's Satoshi, and then what? What has changed? BTC's price is up a little, but BTC's price has been going up or down all year. Sleep well and sweet dreams. Satoshi being known or unknown, dead or alive, won't change anything.
That is what I'm trying to say. Everybody is hyping it up, when it really doesn't matter. |
|
|
|
Satoshi has somewhere around one million coins. If these coins were to be sold on the market, it could crash the price.
He could, but why would he if he founded it? Also, how would finding him allay any fears of that happening? |
|
|
|
IMO there is seriously no point at all figuring out who Satoshi is. If he wants to stay anonymous, let him stay anonymous. It's just the media trying to leave the public a bad impression of bitcoin.
My point exactly. It just doesn't matter! |
|
|
|
|
So this Craig Wright claims to be Satoshi. It has the media and half the bitcoin community up in arms. Why is it such a big deal? The whole point of bitcoin was to have nobody controlling it. Whether or not Craig is Satoshi, why does anybody care? It isn't important to Bitcoin at all. The miners and the people who transact via Bitcoin are more vital to it's survival than finding Satoshi will ever be.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
