Don't include people in your trust list because they have dealt with you and you can trust them with money. This deserves a feedback.
When someone leaves accurate feedback in your perspective, only include them in your trust list. If they leave wrong feedback, exclude them from trust list.
For reference, LoyceV guide is the best- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5191802.0

Once again-
1. You have trade with someone? Leave feedback.
2. You trust someone's judgement based on the feedback they sent- Include them in your trust list.

Prior saying that someone made a death threat, I'd like to ask the community if such an allegation can be considered a death threat: "I will piss on you and burn you".

Take into consideration that the above sentence was said by someone which already made other death threats inside the forum, being also banned 6 months for the previous death threats (he evaded his ban but that's another story).

So, given this context, what is your opinion? Is this a death threat? "I will piss on you and burn you".

I am unsure how to proceed.

Back then, I wanted a place to write some tutorials, technical stuff and awareness threads on bitcoin, cryptocurrency. Since we don't have a subboard, for a while, it seems to me the best place. IIRC, I didn't create any more thread after that one.

@Johny Depp
It doesn't make any sense whether or not newIndia changed hands. They both are Indian- proved. newIndia still is an Indian, no matter who controls the account. But BitcoinDream is pretending to be Bangladeshi while his account isn't changed hands.

But, do we have any evidence that newIndia account did not change hand? Because six years back account trading or using an account as collateral was pretty normal.

He is fluent in Bengali because he is from Kolkata, India. You know Bengali is also used in Kolkata. When I asked about this, he denied and said he had business in India and that's why he had to go in India but he had reserved a spot here- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=330628.msg3838986#msg3838986

It's possible that the account changed hands but for your info, the Bengali thread for Bangladeshi user which BitcoinDream is moderating has been created in 2014- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631891.0
While the bitcoin address which newIndia used in 2014, have been found in BitcoinDream's profile in 2015. Doesn't this prove that the account is still in the hand of same owner as it was at the time of creating the thread?

@Johny Depp, grateful to you. I'm looking for that thread.

On a side note- @DarkStar_, please do me a favor. I was linked to one of your investigations on Chinabet bumping abuse, I can't find it now. I too found some proof some months ago but I forgot which these are. I would be thankful to you if you share the link. Looking for that because this issue has some hidden link with that bumping issue which may come into light.

Hello, what is the best way to report a user who has made a death threat via their personal text?
User:bittafficma
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2706235
http://archive.vn/Gr6Sd

I have already reported it by just doing report to moderator function on one of their posts and tried to explain. However, the threat is not contained in a post.

I don't think you understand what mixing is.

But, yes. This doesn't impact Chipmixer at all, or your privacy.

Any exchange that assumes you are the one that hacked them -/ "binance" -/ and thus tries to take your funds from you is an exchange you should avoid.

Whether or not the evidence is strong enough or not--which it seems to be, and I would definitely believe these are alt accounts--the main question in my mind is whether any DT members would act on this information or not.  Merit abusers generally don't get tagged anymore unless the abuse is extremely blatant, though I can't speak for what Vod would do.  My point is that most of these threads that purport to catch alt accounts sending merits to one another are just wasted time & energy, because the outcome is usually that the accounts don't end up with any tagging whatsoever.

I think threads should only get started when there's extreme abuse going on and when the evidence that accounts are linked is very strong.     Neither of those things are the case here, but I would certainly be interested in what others have to say.

That's still circumstantial, in my opinion.  Just because both wallets sent funds to two common addresses isn't proof that they are owned by the same person.  Two different casinos could be using a common service provider, ISP, coder, etc., etc.

I agree that there are a lot of coincidences; profanity in the usernames, similar coding style for the two sites, similar business models, similar administration... but again, non of that is irrefutable evidence.

You PMed me to look at this, but it could just be coincidence.

Do you have undeniable proof to tie the two together?

I see the DT-changes have turned "bitcoinfuck" red already.

I've searched my archives, and only found these posts in his thread (posted this month, I won't show posts made by "bitcoinfuck"):
...
...
...
None of these posts have been deleted.

join telegram ->  @btcjua