Windows wallet, Github, and explorer all down?
Wondering if I made a mistake defending this one.
Dev?
scam coin and dev got his btcs, all dumped now "verified by c-cex"
|
|
|
Why did no one have a look at the code before already
|
|
|
In "his" thread the Dev always posts some very weird, futuristic stuff he seems to be doing when users are questioning for a roadmap, features etc.. Proof: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=753089.msg8511463#msg8511463Honestly: What the f*** is "we are now experimenting on a model that simulates network performance when several user-populated geo clusters are present" This ain't NASA, SETI or whatever.. You did not re-invent Bitcoin, you simply forked a Coin (Bitcoin) and did no magic to it, your code @ github looks totally normal, mining can be done with SHA-256 on a normal, stratum enabled Pool, there is no "user populated geo cluster" right now and how would you simulate what won't exist ?! You'd have to rewrite the whole Chaincode to "merge" multiple chains simultanously and where is the sense of doing so ?? +1
|
|
|
Since coin is on ccex it only knows one direction.
|
|
|
Still no payout from the official pool... Should I be getting concerned?
I got my payments without problem from supernova. Or which you mean ?
|
|
|
Dumped to the death?
I have feeling this happen with all coin on c-cex
|
|
|
my 4 x sapphire 7950s are wondering when they can work on this coin ?
Everything should be ready in 10-15 minutes
|
|
|
He only had one job....
|
|
|
I was wondering why xhash jumped onto this coin.. Was the only pool with good reputation
|
|
|
from main.h: const int64 nBlockAlgoWorkWeightStart = 99999999; // block where algo work weighting starts
int GetAlgoWorkFactor() const { if (!TestNet() && (nHeight < nBlockAlgoWorkWeightStart)) { return 1; } if (TestNet() && (nHeight < 100)) { return 1; } switch (GetAlgo()) { // work factor = absolute work ratio * optimisation factor case ALGO_SHA: return 1024 * 4; default: return 1024 * 4; } }
no algo work weighting? so one sha block can orphan 1000 scrypt blocks? didn't you learn from myriad? More FUD? do you feel important now? *golf clap This is not FUD. All you have to do to exploit this is to change a daemon to refuse all blocks except SHA blocks. Whenever this daemon generates a new block it will overwrite all blocks from other algorithms on the block-chain. Why not donate the solution to the devs if you know for sure that this is the case? Everyone always seems to know that they are right but never come around to giving a solution to the issues. It was fixed in Myriadcoin. The Joincoin developers removed the fix when they cloned Myriadcoin. They can just read the Myriadcoin thread or look at the Myriadcoin source code. If this is true too, code reviews for an altcoin should not be made by ccex anymore.. This would be the second big bug
|
|
|
This is like the walking dead.. you cannot revive something dead, the name is totally burned.
|
|
|
14:00 minutes was listen till now. +1 I actually like this song now
|
|
|
Still not mine this ?
:-(
Shitcoin
|
|
|
ocminer please answer me pm !
|
|
|
can someone explain to me what happens ?
|
|
|
relaunch ! too many blocks already mined !
|
|
|
|