|
Attitude/behaviour is not related to trust in any way.
|
|
|
|
Member:Full Member:Senior Member:Hero/Legendary Member:
|
|
|
|
|
I can exchange it for you for a 25% rate.
|
|
|
|
Just to add on this, I saw a thread about him by cookiemonsterwhat several months back regarding on a bitcoin scam as well. if I find the thread again ill be sure to link it here. I mean if an admin labeled the scammer tag, its a dead given on the behavior. Also it seems like hes still trying to get this thread bumped for other peoples inputs https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=873763.0 about badbear. Yup, the idiot sent me .2 by accident. I repayed him anyways, even though I could've kept it and not gotten into trouble. But I am honest. He sent you too much money, you told him that you spent the money and would be unable to pay him back. It was only when you ended up being called out by him for scamming him that you eventually paid him back right away Whoever told you that is a liar. Where did you get that information from? PM the same day that he sent it (from me): "I owe you big time. I'll pay you back when I get paid on the 31st, there's no way I am going to let this slip by without paying back." That was my interpenetration of the thread. I do know that you ended up paying him back earlier then the 31st, so you were lying even if that PM "quote" is legit You make zero sense. I paid him back after the 31st, yes. But he was really impatient he made a thread. That thread did nothing, it didn't scare me. Nothing. I payback because it is ethical and right to do so. Not for trust. You repaid him on the 15th of September. The thread was created on the 3rd of September, which is 3 days after you claimed you would have paid him. You clearly did not have any intention of paying him back as if you were planning on paying him back you would have done so as soon as your got paid (31st of August) not more then 2 weeks later My payment from my signature campaign wasn't 0.05, I had to save up. You are just guessing what you think might be true for something that happened 3 months ago. You are going nowhere. |
|
|
|
Just to add on this, I saw a thread about him by cookiemonsterwhat several months back regarding on a bitcoin scam as well. if I find the thread again ill be sure to link it here. I mean if an admin labeled the scammer tag, its a dead given on the behavior. Also it seems like hes still trying to get this thread bumped for other peoples inputs https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=873763.0 about badbear. Yup, the idiot sent me .2 by accident. I repayed him anyways, even though I could've kept it and not gotten into trouble. But I am honest. He sent you too much money, you told him that you spent the money and would be unable to pay him back. It was only when you ended up being called out by him for scamming him that you eventually paid him back right away Whoever told you that is a liar. Where did you get that information from? PM the same day that he sent it (from me): "I owe you big time. I'll pay you back when I get paid on the 31st, there's no way I am going to let this slip by without paying back." That was my interpenetration of the thread. I do know that you ended up paying him back earlier then the 31st, so you were lying even if that PM "quote" is legit You make zero sense. I paid him back after the 31st, yes. But he was really impatient he made a thread. That thread did nothing, it didn't scare me. Nothing. I payback because it is ethical and right to do so. Not for trust. |
|
|
|
|
inb4 Stunna clicks the delete button on his keyboard by accident and all bets are deleted
|
|
|
|
Just to add on this, I saw a thread about him by cookiemonsterwhat several months back regarding on a bitcoin scam as well. if I find the thread again ill be sure to link it here. I mean if an admin labeled the scammer tag, its a dead given on the behavior. Also it seems like hes still trying to get this thread bumped for other peoples inputs https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=873763.0 about badbear. Yup, the idiot sent me .2 by accident. I repayed him anyways, even though I could've kept it and not gotten into trouble. But I am honest. He sent you too much money, you told him that you spent the money and would be unable to pay him back. It was only when you ended up being called out by him for scamming him that you eventually paid him back right away Whoever told you that is a liar. Where did you get that information from? PM the same day that he sent it (from me): "I owe you big time. I'll pay you back when I get paid on the 31st, there's no way I am going to let this slip by without paying back." |
|
|
|
Why don't you take part in the ongoing contests? There are at least 2 available now.
Because people who know nothing about signatures are easily swayed into thinking a shitty signature is a good one. roslin's are a good example of that. Know nothing about signatures? What the hell does that mean? If anyone here believes their signatures are good when they're infact shitty it's you. Pretty much all of your signatures are very basic and just throw as many colours into the mix and look a complete eyesore. You quite clearly cannot handle not winning these design contests. I've won 3+ contests, I'm not mad when I lose. I just, can't stand new users falling for the bullshit those users send through PM. You calling mine shitty? Let's see what you can do sir. Mine are about simplicity and modernism, which is what looks the best imo. I have to agree with hilariousandco on this one. Your signature designs are very basic, and really use nothing more then a lot of colors. I personally do not think they are very unique. Although I have no interest in trying to make a better signature, I do think yours are of low quality. You also have negative trust, so I doubt anyone will trust you enough to buy your template. Thank you for your opinion, but nobody really cares about it  . Not trying to be cocky but there aren't alot of people that have better signature designing skills than me. If you reply to this message it will be considered spam and will be reported. If it is off-topic, but important, please PM me. |
|
|
|
Why don't you take part in the ongoing contests? There are at least 2 available now.
Because people who know nothing about signatures are easily swayed into thinking a shitty signature is a good one. roslin's are a good example of that. Know nothing about signatures? What the hell does that mean? If anyone here believes their signatures are good when they're infact shitty it's you. Pretty much all of your signatures are very basic and just throw as many colours into the mix and look a complete eyesore. You quite clearly cannot handle not winning these design contests. I've won 3+ contests, I'm not mad when I lose. I just, can't stand new users falling for the bullshit those users send through PM. You calling mine shitty? Let's see what you can do sir. Mine are about simplicity and modernism, which is what looks the best imo. |
|
|
|
Just to add on this, I saw a thread about him by cookiemonsterwhat several months back regarding on a bitcoin scam as well. if I find the thread again ill be sure to link it here. I mean if an admin labeled the scammer tag, its a dead given on the behavior. Also it seems like hes still trying to get this thread bumped for other peoples inputs https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=873763.0 about badbear. Yup, the idiot sent me .2 by accident. I repayed him anyways, even though I could've kept it and not gotten into trouble. But I am honest. |
|
|
|
No offence but I think 0.2 for this signature is too much. I can create better than this and like in 30 minutes. Overall good luck and yes you are right people do select wrong entries as winner sometimes don't know why, though i wont take anyone's name separately. When you do a contest you pay 0.2 and get i think more than 25 entries, why someone will pay you 0.2 for 1 entry, anyone would like variety  Go ahead. |
|
|
|
Why don't you take part in the ongoing contests? There are at least 2 available now.
Because people who know nothing about signatures are easily swayed into thinking a shitty signature is a good one. roslin's are a good example of that. |
|
|
|
Well, I made signatures for a contest and didn't end up winning. So I am here, selling it. Basically when you buy it, I take the template and change it up to fit your website with appropriate text and colours. Preview:  Looking for .1 for this amazing set of signatures! Only one sale available! |
|
|
|
|
I can get anything for you, 50% off but it will not ne a legit license.
|
|
|
|
Let me tell you why it's going to fail horribly:
First, your reputation. No one's going to invest with that rep and possibility to scam.
second, the amount raised. Sure you're going to get 15 btc for the entire website development and programming the scripts, but that's it. You won't have any money to backup in case you start losing on the house and you fail to payback players. In another way, I think you'd probably just make it so people keep losing and eventually find out you're scamming them so you could raise the bitcoin to pay them back later. You have exactly no bankroll, therefore, you will fail.
third, I don't trust you with my bitcoin. PERIOD.
Hey man, can I tell you something? Your whole post is based on your opinion, making it useless. I have the same chance of scamming as anyone else. Thanks. Although the first and third are based on Opinion, the middle is based on fact. You won't have enough money to start that casino. I do agree with that point. Hmm, maybe the risk is too big, and although I'd take my chances and have to payout of my pocket if I have to, maybe there's a better option? Sell the idea with the domain and logos, etc. for a good price? |
|
|
|
Let me tell you why it's going to fail horribly:
First, your reputation. No one's going to invest with that rep and possibility to scam.
second, the amount raised. Sure you're going to get 15 btc for the entire website development and programming the scripts, but that's it. You won't have any money to backup in case you start losing on the house and you fail to payback players. In another way, I think you'd probably just make it so people keep losing and eventually find out you're scamming them so you could raise the bitcoin to pay them back later. You have exactly no bankroll, therefore, you will fail.
third, I don't trust you with my bitcoin. PERIOD.
Hey man, can I tell you something? Your whole post is based on your opinion, making it useless. I have the same chance of scamming as anyone else. Thanks. |
|
|
|
How do you guys like my signatures? I think these are my best ones yet: Bump, want people to see this. |
|
|
|
Multipliers: (center to extreme)
---------------------------------------------------
0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 46 0.2 0.2 75
---------------------------------------------------
Max amount playable: 0.666
--
Odds: 98.500%
Max win: 49.95 BTC
Name: Candystripes
Bitcoin Address: 1CandyPE2zp8TQ55BA9gUP4qgVHzzPdDQ7
|
|
|
|
Multipliers: (center to extreme)
---------------------------------------------------
0.3 0.6 1.2 1.5 2 2.4 16 20 30
---------------------------------------------------
Max amount playable: 1.65
--
Odds: 98.297%
Max win: 49.5 BTC
Name: Candystripes
Bitcoin Address: 1CandyPE2zp8TQ55BA9gUP4qgVHzzPdDQ7
|
|
|
|
|
You call them Bitcoiners, that is how they are referred to profesionally.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
