|
I'd love to use this but I'll need to see the source code first. Not to be trusted bt me otherwise.
|
|
|
|
I see people are still posting here. I'm desperately busy with finals in my uni atm, I'll join you in a couple of weeks time.  |
|
|
|
Resource market.  |
|
|
|
|
With the resource market being closed, I'll never get enough Iron to upgrade further. Is it that hard to re-open in? Or is it closed on purpose?
|
|
|
|
|
How the hell am I trolling? Do you realise how imature you are right not? You're essentially trying to avoid everything I say by devaluing me and calling me a troll.
You asked me to adress your lattest rating and so I did... For fucks sake quickseller, I'm not trolling anyone here, perhaps you've emen mistaken the definition of the word.
|
|
|
|
Quickselled has yet to reply here. He was pretty outraged that I didn't notice his 'update' of my trust rating though. Hypocrisy continues(?) |
|
|
|
|
987
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: NSA, CIA, IRS, DHS, ATF, FBI, GCHQ, Federal Reserve, ISIS are the illuminati
|
on: April 29, 2015, 08:35:38 PM
|
|
How is infowars entertainment?
|
|
|
|
Hey just out of curiosity, was I enrolled as a full member?  Yes. I'm not sure how this happened but it did. There were no Senior slots available when you applied, but your activity/history indicates you've been a Senior member since before your application. Lucky you, I guess. That's a pitty.  I was pretty sure that I saw couple of Sr. spots open when I applied. But anyway, if it's impossible for you to change my enrolment to fit my rank it's alright. |
|
|
|
Hey just out of curiosity, was I enrolled as a full member? |
|
|
|
If he had removed it, that would explain what he said to me about checking the top of this thread for an example of a time when he removed unwarranted negative trust. However, it'd be weird that he'd put it back right afterwards....
Why are you leaving positive trust for yourself using your alt account? It seems that https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=117142 is your alt as the signature implies the same. I don't know how to prove it to you, but I can assert to you that r3wt is not my alt. From my experience with him, it seems he also has some issue with with quickseller or just with default trust. Thanks for pointing this out to me, as I don't really check my own feedback unless someone draws my attention to it. r3wt was known for running an exchange, (wasn't he?). I don't think that tspacepilot has showcased technical knowledge appropriate for running an exchange. |
|
|
|
The OP was last active on April 22 so it appears that he has forgot about the auction  It's not like he got any bids either.  0.1 was a decent price though, I'd express interest if he was back. |
|
|
|
Posting for future reference. Also, I'll try to address what's in the rating. I don't think you have disputed any of the facts in my adjusted rating.
 While in the middle of as escrow transaction I wouldn't describe it as the middle of the transaction but my description has little to do. The first interaction we ever had was me telling you that you changed the terms and I'm likely to exit the deal. this person failed to fund the escrow address of a deal despite all of his demands/conditions were met The conditions were met after I wanrned you about exiting the deal and you denied to accept the oroginal terms. The conditions were only met because of the unexpected godwillingness of the other party after my warning about exiting the deal. the conditions of which were scammy by themselves.
Right, this is your description of my terms. You've claimed here that I asked you to change the password of the account before receiving funds from me. Nowhere in the messages I sent you did I say that specifically. I even gave you a way to verify that the account did fit the seller's description without even getting access to the account but this was ignored. AND EVEN THOUGH my otherwise scammy conditions were met, did I end uo scamming anyone? No, I didn't. Because I couldn't and didn't even want to. I would avoid doing business with this person. Very well! Since you personally wouldn't do business with me you're welcome to leave a neutral rating. Many prominent members that looked at the case have pointed out that this would be the most appropriate thing to do. |
|
|
|
Short for what I'd consider fair: him to review the rating to something more accurate/change it to a comment saying that he personally doesn't trust me/remove the rating. I edited the rating to remove the statement that "an agreement was reach" despite that I still believe that fact to be true. I don't think you have disputed any of the facts in my adjusted rating. I had noticed that the OP was changed requesting that the text of my negative trust be updated to something more accurate, so I edited it (deleted and reposted) to something that reflects facts that are undisputed. Unsurprisingly the OP has continued trolling and has not stated this is resolved. Gotta admit, I didn't notice that. We don't get a notification for trust ratings you know. Plust this thread has 5k views and 11 post pages till now. I didn't notice this reply, sorry. Anyway, now that I noticed... I'll admit that the current rating is a bit more accurate. However, I didn't request you to make this change with my latest change in the OP. It was there since the original post from April 13 and you changed the rating today. Another thing, I'm not trolling. I don't appreciate most of your posts as well but I don't devalue them by saying that you're trolling, please avoid that in the future. And also, I don't find your rating completely innacurate as I already admited. But still not 100% accurate so this is not resolved for me.
I know that we've been over this many times, but what you consider a scammy action (me exiting the escrow) was in fact a result of my anger towards you (and this anger still holds slightly, maybe that's why you think I'm trolling you). And what would I have scammed someone out of? Actually nothing, you claim that I would have the name of the account revealed to me and therefore try to ruin the accounts reputation. Why on earth would I do that? Which still seems unreasonable to me because I didn't specifically ask you to change the account's pass before I funded your address but you claimed that I did multiple times here which is ridiculus. And you saying that my conditions were met, is partly true. But this wasn't thanks to you. The other party did hand you the account before I sent you the funds although that didn't came in agreement with your terms. BUT This wasn't something I was expecting since I had contacted you prior to that informing you that I would be exiting the deal if you didn't change the terms and you replied saying that you won't change the terms (also before receiving the account). And even though this happened in a way you described as unsecure. Did I take the chance to bring on my scammy plans? I never did because I didn't plan on scamming someone in the first place, but you still gave me a negative rating (probably because you were also angry at me or something) which is undertandable.
Short for what I'd consider fair: him to review the rating to something more accurate/change it to a comment saying that he personally doesn't trust me/remove the rating.
^^ you also missed the point of it saying to change your rating to a personal comment (neutral rating). Your latest rating is a bit more accurate but in my opinion not 100% fair. After all the backlash in this thread you reviewed the rating, that's good. But I still don't consider this resolved. Lastly, thanks for bringing the discussion back on topic. Please try to always be accurate and objective with your ratings. |
|
|
|
I have pissed off a lot of people and cost them a lot of money they were hoping to steal.
You have also pissed off a lot of innocent people and prevented them from contributing to the Bitcoin community because of your false or misleading accusations. No. Here we go, in denial again. |
|
|
|
If the auction is still on, I will bid 0.05 to start it though I know the initial bid is 0.1 BTC but that's high for this, the reason being that the site is a copy of bitdice and to add on to that, there is a tough competition in the market for a dice site so I would have to get something new integrated in the script. If you accept the offer do tell me  We'd better wait for an update from OP... |
|
|
|
|
Any updates? I forgot about this auction. :/
|
|
|
|
Looks like he's gone the opposite way with me. He's added more negative trust (trust spamming?). His new one says that not only does he take a known scammer's word for it that I'm somehow a scammer, but because I called him out for his smear campaign, that also makes me untrustworthy. He says "avoid interacting with me at all". Hey, Quickseller, how is leaving three negative trust ratings on me (between you and your alt) equal to avoiding interaction? Seems like immature trolling to me.
Holy shit! Just looked at your ratings, did that idiot give you negative trust for something you did two years ago? How objective of you Quickseller, it's not like you targeted because you hate him, not at all. He really deserved a negative trust rating 2 years after no one else had complained about what he did. No wonder that you think accts seller is his alt, he necroposted on your scam accusation from 2013 2 years afterwards just to target you from what is seems. Way to abuse his position in default trust. |
|
|
|
|
If you're trying to look at the results of a scientific study from a major media channel's annalisys you're gonna have a bad time.
|
|
|
|
|
Has this acocunt been posting about BTC related stuff? Any successful promotions you ran with the account?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
