Ok, thank you very much guys, i changed addnodes and it works fine now:)

Hello,
i have 0 active connections,
please help someone

It's really up to the devs but if I had any say in it, I would be strongly against merging SUPER with anything else.
If coin specs gets changed that significantly, it might as well be renamed as it's no longer the original SUPER.

keep going with the discussion, but it seems more people just want it to stay separated.

Neat idea would be to run Supercoin through a block explorer and log all balances (besides dust), nullify the chain by changing pchMessage bytes, change block value for block 1 to a suitable amount which could encompass total values of addresses that we've logged, relaunch chain and then distribute on block 2.

Other variables could be changed to reflect current state of coin including block reward etc.

This way everyone can just dump their existing addresses via dumpprivkey; move to new wallet, reimport the keys and everything should be (relatively) as it was. Except the wallet isn't chugging through 2,000,000 blocks to sync; or verify when a new key is added.

About 4 hours work.
Note - I do not hold any SUPER; someone has approached me asking how this coin could be made 'SUPER' again.

barrystyle

Check now if your wallet is full sync
now all running normally!!!!!

Lets not do voting then but lets get a general consensus of people opinions right here. If its too hard to call maybe using blockchain tech and our brains we can set up a way of honest voting.
Griffith to remain as leader/director/oversear, he has proven over time he has the best interests for the life of the coin at heart. He might not be the best at writing new code, thats ok. Thats why we look for devs that are for hire to work on new ideas. Grow the team.
The development of a coin should i think be in the hands of the community.
ECC i think should not be included, its coin count would throw things out, plus its true potential will be realized independently of other coins.
MWC and its low coin count is the perfect choice for going cross-chain. It was delisted recently from Bitrex, maybe there's opportunity here for it relisted as/with the new Super once new works has been reviewed and implemented.

I think that there is no need for any votes.

The development of a coin should be in the hands of the developers, they should make the decision how to continue with the coin, not the investors that all have a focus on fast profit. Investors that don't like the direction that the developers go can step out while others will step in.

We have seen it many times now that the voting process is always manipulated with false votes and Never has brought anything good. It also is a sign that the developers are not sure what to do next.

So in my opinion NO VOTING

Why should MWC be included, it is basically a dead coin.
Also would make the swap a lot simpler if it is Super only, and then no need to change names.


FYI:
ECC wallet at Bleutrade is offline, no response from their support yet.  


 

is there a new wallet? im using v4.0.1.0

Website : http://brexit.co.in
Facebook :https://www.facebook.com/groups/259883517701222/
Twitter:https://twitter.com/Brexit_coin

Yes it does.
I think the owner is still busy with some stuff because of the migration so we need to have some
patience before SUPER will be listed.

Next to that, later this week i probably have very good news for the SUPER community
Keep an eye on this thread...

Look at the price, definitely a buying opportunity. I've got my order in

Mind you I bought a tad at 190, but what the hell, he who dares wins, a quote
most probably thought up by scammers but I'm betting this project will fly IMO.

The rewards are going to drop at 43.1 blocks but I'm waiting for POS so
miners get that block number up past 86.4k.