Gold still has value now, not historically. I'm not terrible concerned about harvesting asteroids in 40 years when I'll be almost dead. Frankly with the complete lack of public support for space programs I'm highly skeptical of it happening in my lifetime. Took NASA 40 years to get out of low earth orbit again, and yes i got up at 3am to watch the capsule slash down. Of on a tangent slightly. Asteroid mining should be a major focus. One of the big monsters could supply a lot of material, plus the He3 on the moon. |
|
|
|
http://www.mikebrownsolutions.com/fish3.htmFor Pogue—or any similar carburetor—to go 100 mpg on a gallon of fuel on a vehicle normally going 20 mpg, the air/fuel ratio would have to be in the neighborhood of 75 to 1 or better. Charles Nelson Pogue was a machinist with no formal training in thermodynamics
Any second-year college chemistry student knows that.
Go to school retard.
|
|
|
|
|
Gold has value everywhere in the world
I can buy and sell gold in any amount with a 15 minute drive and zero questions. It's pretty liquid.
A goldbacked crypto is literally an oxymoron. If you dont hold it you dont own it.
Kitco hates bitcoin and bitcointalk hates gold. Both are stupid positions to take. I hold both and i trust my gold will have value next year a lot more than my bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
Bullshit. There are 195 countries in the world, if this had any merit at least one would be profiting off it but they're not.
Its not that the technology is suppressed, the technology is impossible. If every last joule of energy in the gasoline was extracted you would be able to sustain 33KW/h about 45hp. The problem is most of the energy in an ICE is wasted as heat. It has nothing to do with the carburetor and everything to do with combustion. Think about it logically. If you ignite a vapour, how do you prevent heat and ensure all the energy is converted to kinetic to move the piston? An uncontrolled combustion reaction doesn't work. A fuel cell does work, highly energetic electrons on hydrogen atoms are oxidized, while oxygen becomes reduced. The potential energy of the electrons is harnessed in the fuel cell and water is produced. |
|
|
|
|
Conservation of energy look it up.
The required kinetic energy to accelerate and then keep a vehicle at velocity, plus waste heat is easily calculated, a highschool student can do it. The amount of energy in a gallon of gasoline is known, these numbers have to match.
|
|
|
|
There is no reason to discuss further. You have to add AVERAGE HASHRATE GRAPH to BETARIGS!!!
Just switch to mining rig rentals, this shit doesn't happen. The renters can't lie about speed, everything is automated. I've had zero issues with all my rentals since switching. I have 100% rating, like I should. I used betarigs since they started without a single problem, then Mux put in the graphs and i had nothing but renters bitching about hash rates and unilateral refunds. I had this situation happen before, a renter was over compensated with extra time and still got a partial refund. I actually lost money on these rentals. Everyone should switch and let this abortion die in peace. I've gone to Nicehash. Making MUCH more profit over there. Betarigs is a joke now and MRR is heading downhill too. Nicehash rent hash, not rigs so you get whatever speed you want. Plus I'm paying a lot less for it too. I use nice hash as a backup pool, I set my rental prices about 25% higher than nicehash's payout, seems ok, I'm at least making profit these days. |
|
|
|
|
Seriously basic arithmetic, with the simplest possible simultaneous equations. This is grade 8 math (13 year olds) at best. Even the sum of squares polynomial was pre-factored. I helped a relative study for her gcse math test years ago, I couldn't believe how rudimentary it was.
Where I live the local high school math courses have become so degraded the community colleges won't accept them as prerequisites for calculus any more. An A in math 12 places a student at the beginning of a 3 course algebra/trig/precalc sequence.
My step sister was able to pass math 12 by doing a project about 5 years ago.
|
|
|
|
Tsoutsounopaikth, liakopoulo's books and conspiracist's blogs isnt the only material that one should read. I will urge you to read some material from the other side too. You will be amazed of what you can understand. You make very big allegations that have answers for 1-3 centuries now and you refute to take the answers into account. Although your name makes me think that you are probably just a troll. A successful one  I have the right to express my opinion publicly. Do you have a problem with that? Good thing science isn't a democracy. Opinions don't matter, results do. |
|
|
|
we covered this already too didn't we? even if you gained control of 51% of masternodes, you would have: 1) 0.000000000000000000000403286875% probability of deanonymizing a transaction 2) 0.0% of making any money https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1001642.msg10900308#msg10900308so 'hosting it on a centralized server is much more "dangerous" than for a regular node' is just a crock and you know it because we already talked about it right?  This is not a good argument. If you gain 51% of the Monero nodes you would have 0% of both. With Bitcoin maybe you could argue that being able to link a node to a transaction will let you follow the blockchain trail and figure out stuff that node has been involved in, but I also guess that it's a harder link to prove. So therefore 51% attack for deanonimization is pointless for BOTH Dash and Monero. The problem with Monero for me, is that during DASH anonimization, the info isn't recoverable. In Monero it is, with a viewkey, or if someone found a backdoor......so you have to ask, how anonymous do you want? (are you really not from XMR?  ) Again not true, just hours after Dash was open sourced, an amateur coder found an exploit in darksend. Ring Signatures has been around for over a decade. ....a good example of how Dash devs are open to finding and fixing problems quickly. When I raised concerns about origins of CryptoNote with links to NSA and Cicada in Bytecoin, the response was 'that was ages ago, anything would have been found by now' whilst the devs are trolling on forums all day....which one would you trust your $ with? Quite the opposite. Dash/DRK had it's code reviewed when it was closed source, yet a amateur coder was able to find a flaw in Darksends coding that allowed for deanonymization, just hours after it was open sourced. Saying that cryptonote is somehow connected to the NSA is the same as saying Bitcoin is somehow connected to the NSA and that Satoshi Nakamoto was a government entity. Those are conspiracy theories that anyone can come up with, and has no bearings in fact. Using them makes you look like a troll. The same and more could be said for Dash, as someone(a newbie account) came and said that Dash was compromised by the government back in 2014. This is a lie. The bug allowed the exploiter to collect a disproportionate amount of the block reward. Anonymity was not broken, never has been. STOP LYING!https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg9121458#msg9121458Excuse me? Here's the article: https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/darkcoin-finds-fixes-darksend-privacy-bug/https://dashtalk.org/threads/darksend-security-bulletin.2963/Here's what Dash's developer said: We ask that everyone stop using Darksend for the time being until we’re able to push out a fix to an issue Aswan found. This issue comes from the way fees are paid in Darksend with the combination of the way the client tries to denominate the same amount each round. The result is the possibility to trace a transaction through Darksend. To fix this issue, we will add a mixing stage to Darksend that only mixes fee’s and we’ll have the client mix random amounts each session. -Eddufield/Dash's Developer If you're going to troll, please don't make up lies. This is the 2nd time you've attempted to lie on me as well. You claimed it was de-anonymized. Show me where. You've shown me a quote saying it may have been possible, in October. Show me where anonymity was broken, as you claimed. |
|
|
|
we covered this already too didn't we? even if you gained control of 51% of masternodes, you would have: 1) 0.000000000000000000000403286875% probability of deanonymizing a transaction 2) 0.0% of making any money https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1001642.msg10900308#msg10900308so 'hosting it on a centralized server is much more "dangerous" than for a regular node' is just a crock and you know it because we already talked about it right? This is not a good argument. If you gain 51% of the Monero nodes you would have 0% of both. With Bitcoin maybe you could argue that being able to link a node to a transaction will let you follow the blockchain trail and figure out stuff that node has been involved in, but I also guess that it's a harder link to prove. So therefore 51% attack for deanonimization is pointless for BOTH Dash and Monero. The problem with Monero for me, is that during DASH anonimization, the info isn't recoverable. In Monero it is, with a viewkey, or if someone found a backdoor......so you have to ask, how anonymous do you want? (are you really not from XMR? ) Again not true, just hours after Dash was open sourced, an amateur coder found an exploit in darksend. Ring Signatures has been around for over a decade. ....a good example of how Dash devs are open to finding and fixing problems quickly. When I raised concerns about origins of CryptoNote with links to NSA and Cicada in Bytecoin, the response was 'that was ages ago, anything would have been found by now' whilst the devs are trolling on forums all day....which one would you trust your $ with? Quite the opposite. Dash/DRK had it's code reviewed when it was closed source, yet a amateur coder was able to find a flaw in Darksends coding that allowed for deanonymization, just hours after it was open sourced. Saying that cryptonote is somehow connected to the NSA is the same as saying Bitcoin is somehow connected to the NSA and that Satoshi Nakamoto was a government entity. Those are conspiracy theories that anyone can come up with, and has no bearings in fact. Using them makes you look like a troll. The same and more could be said for Dash, as someone(a newbie account) came and said that Dash was compromised by the government back in 2014. This is a lie. The bug allowed the exploiter to collect a disproportionate amount of the block reward. Anonymity was not broken, never has been. STOP LYING!https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg9121458#msg9121458 |
|
|
|
There is no reason to discuss further. You have to add AVERAGE HASHRATE GRAPH to BETARIGS!!!
Just switch to mining rig rentals, this shit doesn't happen. The renters can't lie about speed, everything is automated. I've had zero issues with all my rentals since switching. I have 100% rating, like I should. I used betarigs since they started without a single problem, then Mux put in the graphs and i had nothing but renters bitching about hash rates and unilateral refunds. I had this situation happen before, a renter was over compensated with extra time and still got a partial refund. I actually lost money on these rentals. Everyone should switch and let this abortion die in peace. |
|
|
|
As a fat dude, It is not healthy to be fat, and it is not a choice either. It is more like an addiction to food.
It could be a hormonal problem as well. Yes hormones violate the laws of thermodynamics. Yes being diabetic with poor insulin sensitivity can lead to increased conversion of glucose to triglycerides, making it difficult to drop weight, but being fat comes from too much food, period. Body fat isn't absorbed from the atmosphere. Being fat isn't healthy period. You may be able to maintain some basic blood markers(electrolytes, cbc) in the normal range, but hormonal profiles will change. Increased aromatization of testosterone -> estrogen, decreased t4->t3 conversion, piss poor glucose uptake and increased homocysteine. Sleep apnea is also very common, and most people don't realize they are literally suffocating in their sleep. |
|
|
|
As I said earlier, not equally. The government will have a hell of a easier time forcing masternode owners to give themselves in or just taking down the servers the masternodes are hosted on, than forcing users of Monero or Zerocash to do the same. It's a hell of a lot harder for the gov to do that to users of coins that dont utilize external masternodes to provide anonymity(monero).
For non gov entities, I suppose finding another flaw in darksends rounds, or a flaw in masternodes themselves would be much more plausible.
Look, people host MNs on VPS cos it's easy to do and the workload is lightweight (presently). You think if Guv started going after VPS people would still host on there? No, they'd host in just the same places that Monero workloads are hosted, meaning the challenge of finding the nodes would be equitable. Anyway, the point is that guv/TLA is an unassailable adversary - they're going to win whatever you do. The real-world, fit-for-purpose debate has to be around lesser adversaries, so give me just one example of such an adversary who could mount a successful attack on a 2,400 strong network of nodes spread across 30+ countries. I know, I'm saying that you cannot compare these coins equally, since taking down a coin's anonymity with masternodes like Dash is much easier than taking down a coin that doesn't use masternodes like Monero.. Thats it. If a scenario came where the government was banning all use of cryptocurrencies etc, you can expect masternodes on coins to be one of the first things taken down by the government. The challenge of finding the nodes? The ip's of all masternodes are in the open. I gave an example of someone finding another flaw in darksends code and being able to deanonymize transactions, or finding a flaw in the masternodes themselves. Prove your claim, otherwise its conjecture. Anyone can spout anything they want, without evidence its just bullshit.
Prove your claimAre you trolling? Most masternodes are hosted on centralized servers online, such as Amazon. The government can easily subpoena Amazon or simply forcefully take control of the server the masternodes are hosted on. Ring Signatures has been around for over a decade, monero uses no external nodes to rely on for anonymity, meaning it'd be much harder for a gov entity to do the same thing to Monero than it could do to Dash. You dont seriously need a explanation for something this mediocre do you... Prove anonymity can be broken easier in dash, not that a single country can take over a vps. That requires demonstrative evidence, not your opinion. Prove anonymity can be broken in dash easier than monero. I will help 1. break anonymity in dash 2. break animosity in monero 3. compare resources required for step 1 and 2 See you have a logic failure, to claim anonymity can be broken easier in dash than monero, PRESUPPOSES anonymity can be broken in either. You have literally argued monero is flawed. Well done. Do you even know what was being discussed, troll? We're not talking about breaking the anonymity(To which it would still be easier to do for Dash), but for how easy it would be for a gov to take down the anonymity/coin. Go back under your troll bridge thanks. Let me help you out, not discussing anonymity? Look up a little to the giant bold letters. since taking down a coin's anonymity with masternodes like Dash is much easier than taking down a coin that doesn't use masternodes like Monero/ Since I call out your easily proved lies and logically fallacies I'm a troll. I said taking down anonymity, are you dumb? Is taking down anonymity synonymous with breaking into the anonymity?No. So, please, get educated. Then you are misinformed, coins are pre-mixed. Once mixed, all master nodes can vanish. Anonymity remains, and yes you can use a cold wallet, since last summer. |
|
|
|
As I said earlier, not equally. The government will have a hell of a easier time forcing masternode owners to give themselves in or just taking down the servers the masternodes are hosted on, than forcing users of Monero or Zerocash to do the same. It's a hell of a lot harder for the gov to do that to users of coins that dont utilize external masternodes to provide anonymity(monero).
For non gov entities, I suppose finding another flaw in darksends rounds, or a flaw in masternodes themselves would be much more plausible.
Look, people host MNs on VPS cos it's easy to do and the workload is lightweight (presently). You think if Guv started going after VPS people would still host on there? No, they'd host in just the same places that Monero workloads are hosted, meaning the challenge of finding the nodes would be equitable. Anyway, the point is that guv/TLA is an unassailable adversary - they're going to win whatever you do. The real-world, fit-for-purpose debate has to be around lesser adversaries, so give me just one example of such an adversary who could mount a successful attack on a 2,400 strong network of nodes spread across 30+ countries. I know, I'm saying that you cannot compare these coins equally, since taking down a coin's anonymity with masternodes like Dash is much easier than taking down a coin that doesn't use masternodes like Monero.. Thats it. If a scenario came where the government was banning all use of cryptocurrencies etc, you can expect masternodes on coins to be one of the first things taken down by the government. The challenge of finding the nodes? The ip's of all masternodes are in the open. I gave an example of someone finding another flaw in darksends code and being able to deanonymize transactions, or finding a flaw in the masternodes themselves. Prove your claim, otherwise its conjecture. Anyone can spout anything they want, without evidence its just bullshit.
Prove your claimAre you trolling? Most masternodes are hosted on centralized servers online, such as Amazon. The government can easily subpoena Amazon or simply forcefully take control of the server the masternodes are hosted on. Ring Signatures has been around for over a decade, monero uses no external nodes to rely on for anonymity, meaning it'd be much harder for a gov entity to do the same thing to Monero than it could do to Dash. You dont seriously need a explanation for something this mediocre do you... Prove anonymity can be broken easier in dash, not that a single country can take over a vps. That requires demonstrative evidence, not your opinion. Prove anonymity can be broken in dash easier than monero. I will help 1. break anonymity in dash 2. break animosity in monero 3. compare resources required for step 1 and 2 See you have a logic failure, to claim anonymity can be broken easier in dash than monero, PRESUPPOSES anonymity can be broken in either. You have literally argued monero is flawed. Well done. Do you even know what was being discussed, troll? We're not talking about breaking the anonymity(To which it would still be easier to do for Dash), but for how easy it would be for a gov to take down the anonymity/coin. Go back under your troll bridge thanks. Let me help you out, not discussing anonymity? Look up a little to the giant bold letters. since taking down a coin's anonymity with masternodes like Dash is much easier than taking down a coin that doesn't use masternodes like Monero/ Since I call out your easily proved lies and logically fallacies I'm a troll. |
|
|
|
As I said earlier, not equally. The government will have a hell of a easier time forcing masternode owners to give themselves in or just taking down the servers the masternodes are hosted on, than forcing users of Monero or Zerocash to do the same. It's a hell of a lot harder for the gov to do that to users of coins that dont utilize external masternodes to provide anonymity(monero).
For non gov entities, I suppose finding another flaw in darksends rounds, or a flaw in masternodes themselves would be much more plausible.
Look, people host MNs on VPS cos it's easy to do and the workload is lightweight (presently). You think if Guv started going after VPS people would still host on there? No, they'd host in just the same places that Monero workloads are hosted, meaning the challenge of finding the nodes would be equitable. Anyway, the point is that guv/TLA is an unassailable adversary - they're going to win whatever you do. The real-world, fit-for-purpose debate has to be around lesser adversaries, so give me just one example of such an adversary who could mount a successful attack on a 2,400 strong network of nodes spread across 30+ countries. I know, I'm saying that you cannot compare these coins equally, since taking down a coin's anonymity with masternodes like Dash is much easier than taking down a coin that doesn't use masternodes like Monero.. Thats it. If a scenario came where the government was banning all use of cryptocurrencies etc, you can expect masternodes on coins to be one of the first things taken down by the government. The challenge of finding the nodes? The ip's of all masternodes are in the open. I gave an example of someone finding another flaw in darksends code and being able to deanonymize transactions, or finding a flaw in the masternodes themselves. Prove your claim, otherwise its conjecture. Anyone can spout anything they want, without evidence its just bullshit.
Prove your claimAre you trolling? Most masternodes are hosted on centralized servers online, such as Amazon. The government can easily subpoena Amazon or simply forcefully take control of the server the masternodes are hosted on. Ring Signatures has been around for over a decade, monero uses no external nodes to rely on for anonymity, meaning it'd be much harder for a gov entity to do the same thing to Monero than it could do to Dash. You dont seriously need a explanation for something this mediocre do you... Prove anonymity can be broken easier in dash, not that a single country can take over a vps. That requires demonstrative evidence, not your opinion. Prove anonymity can be broken in dash easier than monero. I will help 1. break anonymity in dash 2. break anonymity in monero 3. compare resources required for step 1 and 2 See you have a logic failure, to claim anonymity can be broken easier in dash than monero, PRESUPPOSES anonymity can be broken in either. You have literally argued monero is flawed. Well done. |
|
|
|
As I said earlier, not equally. The government will have a hell of a easier time forcing masternode owners to give themselves in or just taking down the servers the masternodes are hosted on, than forcing users of Monero or Zerocash to do the same. It's a hell of a lot harder for the gov to do that to users of coins that dont utilize external masternodes to provide anonymity(monero).
For non gov entities, I suppose finding another flaw in darksends rounds, or a flaw in masternodes themselves would be much more plausible.
Look, people host MNs on VPS cos it's easy to do and the workload is lightweight (presently). You think if Guv started going after VPS people would still host on there? No, they'd host in just the same places that Monero workloads are hosted, meaning the challenge of finding the nodes would be equitable. Anyway, the point is that guv/TLA is an unassailable adversary - they're going to win whatever you do. The real-world, fit-for-purpose debate has to be around lesser adversaries, so give me just one example of such an adversary who could mount a successful attack on a 2,400 strong network of nodes spread across 30+ countries. I know, I'm saying that you cannot compare these coins equally, since taking down a coin's anonymity with masternodes like Dash is much easier than taking down a coin that doesn't use masternodes like Monero.. Thats it. If a scenario came where the government was banning all use of cryptocurrencies etc, you can expect masternodes on coins to be one of the first things taken down by the government. The challenge of finding the nodes? The ip's of all masternodes are in the open. I gave an example of someone finding another flaw in darksends code and being able to deanonymize transactions, or finding a flaw in the masternodes themselves. Prove your claim, otherwise its conjecture. Anyone can spout anything they want, without evidence its just bullshit.
Prove your claim |
|
|
|
Extremely big, yes.
I was too slow with my edit so I will repost here: ---------------------------- Hypothetical Situation: Coffee shop owner: "OK, that'll be .7865 DASH please. My address is Xkh65Rfk8... Me: "OK, sent." Coffee shop owner checks his wallet and .7865 DASH appear. Is his response A) "Thank you, come again" or B) "Can you cryptographically proof you sent me the funds?" That's fine when the business has large reputational constraints. Quite different when dealing with an actor who might be on the margins. Which would include most non brick and mortar businesses. That is to say if the reputational constraints are extremely dispraportionate than what you are discibing works fine. I.E. the difference in the value of starbucks reputation compared to the value of my reputation. However if the two parties are at all similar, than there exists a risk where if you accuse him of being dishonest, he can turn around and say no it was actually you who was dishonest, he is in a position to inflict equal damage to your reputation as you are to his. Cryptographic proof shows, atleast more clearly, who is in the right. When NASA first started sending up astronauts, they quickly discovered that ballpoint pens would not work in zero gravity. To combat the problem, NASA scientists spent a decade and $12 billion to develop a pen that writes in zero gravity, upside down, underwater, on almost any surface, and at temperatures ranging from below freezing to 300 degrees Celsius. The Russians used a pencil. Lets kill this false tale starting now http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fact-or-fiction-nasa-spen/. "Coffee shop owner" doesn't give a damn, he just wants to be paid promptly and efficiently. DASH payments using darksend (rename coming soon I hope) and instantx produce an untraceable transaction in 5 seconds. If the coffee shop owner keeps books listing his customers, he can check this transaction off as "paid". If he doesn't need to know who gave him payment... I love this, I can lie if it suits my purpose, If I get called out, I can claim I was being hyperbolic. 12 billion dollars, the entire Apollo program cost less than 20. Next time pick a better lie. |
|
|
|
|
For an actual answer...
Yes the vitamin will absorb, but it's not absorption with the vitamin that's the issue, its compound competition. For example calcium competes with iron.
It is completely possible to develop deficiencies even eating a balanced diet. Iodine deficiency is becoming common again. I have 3 family members with poor thyroid ratings, one had a goiter, one isn't a blood relative. Potassium Iodide treatment fixed all of them. People don't use iodized salt anymore.
Iron deficiency can occur even with servings of regular red meat. Anemia can occur.
If your athletic at all, elements can become depleted, Mg, Zn, Se
If you're under 30 and in good health you wouldn't notice much, but as you get older deficiencies can manifest into noticeable symptoms.
|
|
|
|
I have read through this topic several times... A little confusing situation... What kind of proof you want more? For me wasn't enough only few pics, video in shitty quality and a listing on ebay to buy one of these units for full price. I'm interested in much more information(i have looked through the most part of companies and this lack of information has 60% of these companies). But to purchase one of these for half price - is more than enough. I'm considering to order the cheapest one. If this is SHIT I'll loose only 500$. Only than I'll be able to tell that it's a scam. They have been offering promotions for both, "batches", but I have yet to see anyone post that they have bought a unit or received a unit, despite claims that the first batch has been sold out, and this one is almost sold out. As I understand there are more than 5 000 000 crypto users all over the world. They claim that have sold(and as stated on their website shipped) first batch of 35 units. Do the math and you will get the answer. P.S. I don't trust anybody and I'm not sure that these units really exists but here I must agree with hdmediaservices about the sick skepsis of the elder users. We all have lost something on scams but sometimes there are really good opportunity between these scams but everybody is scared. P.P.S. I will... I don't know what I will do if this is SHIT and I have taken their side... Speak for yourself. When did naivety and stupidity become virtues. Elders...I'm 35. jesus christ. |
|
|
|
There has been a long time dispute over The Auschwitz incident , Some say it never took place . While some say it did take place and there are many proofs for that. On this topic , a moment comes when both parties agree on the fact that there were some people who were used in war and they were given good facilities while others were not. Some also said , peoples were made bald because of a serious bacterial infection, while I dont agree to that. Now I believe that Holocaust is not a Hoax. There are many witnesses who wer freed or liberated by russians. So you guys tell me what do you think about "Holocaust is a Hoax ?"
I address the two bold sections. 1. There is no dispute, in as much as it is disputed if the earth is flat. 2. I think you mean slavery, not used.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
