And like I've already said Mr. shit for brains, I'm not an alt of Rizzrack, and I gave you a way to prove it, I'm not trying to dox you,  you can send your mom, your cousin or whoever the fck you want, I am only willing to dox myself to prove the amount of shit for brains you have.  You make fake and baseless acussations, literally the only reason you're saying I'm Rizzrack is cause I didn't agree with your shit reasoning and since he didn't also, boom, that makes sense, I must be his alt, I must be supporting scammers etc etc.

You're everything that's wrong with this forum, a "white knight" who's moral compass is so offtrack it's actually disgusting, you're just a shitty groupie,  AND YOU ARE INFACT SUPPORTING EXTORTIONS AND BLACKMAILERS !

And I agree with yahoo, please go ahead and create a reputation thread with your evidence that I'm Rizzrack and lets not derail this thread any longer.

Addressing the negative feedback I gave you, even if it doesn't have any impact on your profile since I'm not on DT,  it is 100% accurate, since you support someone who tryed to blackmail and extort another user here based on NOTHING, some "investigation" Lauda took it upon herself to hold, thus you are more shady than half the people you accuse here on this forum.   Lauda was imediatelly demoted for this, her account was flagged, none of you wanna be ass lickers called him/her out on it, cause during that time you were too busy kissing ass cheecks left and right to make your way through the Bitcointalk rankings.
Lauda and co took it upon themselves to be judge jury and executioner, and when Zeroxal proved the source of his bitcoin holdings ( though it's wild he had to do an AML for Lauda ), bitcointalk's "Justice League' backed down.  Sadly Zeroxal should've went to the police/authorities with the extortion attempts against him, but since the guy had quite big amount of bags, I'm assuming more or less he didn't want to get authorities involved to protect his privacy same way you don't want to meet up.

Even if the story behind the PGP key was legitimate, it is still wrong in 100 different ways and ILLEGAL the way they went about it.  But the PGP key could also have been an "alibi" in case the obvious happened and Zeroxal went public with the extortion attempt, which it did!

But like I said, you're just on overachieving ass licker with morals that work only when you decide them to.

You deflect any  feedback that's thrown to you and doesn't paint you in a good light.  You are literally more shady than half the people you accuse here on bitcointalk.


This is  the funniest shit you've said so far, considering this is the exact way you're going about all of this, but hey you know that old romanian saying " Thieves scream thieves", that sums you up just right.
Like I said, you're simply turning things how they sim fit with your little stories to bring you in a good light. Kind of wild that some years ago you were suggesting an IRL meet up for bitcointalk members !? But hey, of course you'd backtrack 100% now since it would prove that you're just a dumb fuck who simply deflects anything thrown their way, but I really do suggest you should keep some track on your bullshits, otherwise you'll keep saying opposite things all the time.

I'd honestly keep going but don't see it making any sense at this point. I mean you're clearly sticking up with your "pal", fun fact, noticed some similarities whenever Gazeta goes after someone, weirdly enough you follow him, must be just a coincidence.

But hey, since you guys have clearly no problem with extortion and blackmail,  doing your little troll show isn't probaby even 10 % of what you're capable off. So I'll be off for now, probably gona get those beers that Rizrack suggested, or wait I suggested to myself, no idea at this point, you guys might have convinced me of being his alt.  I applaud your detective skills.

So bye, at least for now, probably gona have to respond to NewsletterTabloid's next period tantrum.

This might come as a shock to you, but people from this forum, met in real life quite a few times.   And funny enough, hell didn't break loose.

But I kind of get it, since your pal GazetaBitcoin is all onboard with extortion and harrasmenet, kind of makes sense why he wouldn't want people knowing who he is.

I could post from my main account, but then again you'd proceed in saying after  "that doesn't mean that your main account isn't an alt of Rizzrack also".



Still funny as heck though, seems I got a negative trust rating from the newsletter guy also, thus proving my point, why posting from an alt account.  But go ahead though, tell me more how he's not abusing the trust system however fits his teenage girl dramas.

You could send your mother for all I care, hire a 3rd party mediator to meet us and confirm the data or whatever, but we both know you won't accept, as it will simply prove you're wrong and your fragile ego couldn't handle that.  And please stop thinking of yourself as the second coming of Satoshi Nakamoto, you're not that important mate to be worried about someone trying to dox you, not that I'd need to meet you face to face to figure out who you are....


No idea what a Cryptios gang is, but hey, I'm kind of getting used to you spouting ridiculous nonsense.
 

So basically because of the good Lauda did to this forum you support extortion and blackmail ? Kind of messed up set of values you have there mister.


I might actually take you up on that offer, but considering the circumstances and the truth our friend who like to write newsletters has uncovered, might I add even better than Sherlock Holmes would uncover the most sofisticated murder mistery, wouldn't that mean you'd simply be buying beers to yourself ?!

Again, why don't we put our money where our mouth is, and why don't you accept my offer of 0.1 btc ( escrowed) proving I'm not Rizzrack's alt ?  Since we're all from the same country it shouldn't be too hard to do it.   I'm guessing I could simply come and show you my device, the one I've been using to connect on bitcointalk for the past 5 years + on my main account and ofcourse this one for the past 1 year +,   and if Rizzrack would do the same I'm pretty sure a moderator/admin would be kind enough to confirm that these devices were used to log on since the beginning.  I'm willing to dox myself to you to simply show the lack in your brain's capacity, or better yet lets sweeten the pot,  0.2 BTC, if Rizzrack does the same that's some easy 0.4 BTC for you  right ?   You're trying to hard to set an image of yourself as some high and mighty forum superstar, when in fact it just proves my point, not agreeing with your way of handling things = painting an user in a way that fits your ego.


I know you'll refuse to do it, since it doesn't fit your make belief scenarios and your forum "savior" complex.

If you continue basing your *facts* on how you see things fit in your head, simply shows the amount of objectivity you pull into this forum.

P.S. - Noticed you mention missing Lauda, should I assume you support someone who openly tried to extort someone here on the forum? And went as far as to contacting the other user's family members? When Lauda and co could have simply handed it over to the authorities, if the proof they were talking about existed?


Does anyone have an undeniable way of proving account ownership and dismissing the " alt of someone" theory ? Open to suggestions, prefferably someone other than GazetaBitcoin's groupie 1miau.

It's not that "after been offline since 13th of february" it's more along the lines that you literally addressed me 2 days ago, and I answerred you yesterday.

Don't worry I'll make sure to address every word and punctuation you've pointed my way.

But man, honestly now, it really seems like you have an act for stirring up drama,  were you by any chance not accepted into the "popular girl group" back in highschool and trying now to relive your dream life via bitcointalk ?

Edit - My offer still stands, 0.1 btc if I'm Rizzrack's alt or not.  
And I'd appreciate it if you stop addressing me as Rizzrack's alt, without any valid proof other than your tingly spidey teenage girl sense.  Cause if I'd follow your judgement, considering the lack of brain cell power you show,  which of course you've accused saxydev of lacking in that department, I will consider based on your Sherlock Holmes how to make a case guide,  I might assume you're an alt of saxydev.


Edit 2.0 - It appears he's even given me a trust rating based on what his beed sheets looked like this morning.       Ah jeez.... no idea why I decided to post from an alt account in the first place.

Look.... you keep contradicting yourself, while you mention in some comments that I'm not Rizzrack's alt, you also proceed in putting up retarded comments such as this one where your detective skills clearly figured it all out.

I promise I'll take the time in the following days to address your questions,  though I'm pretty sure you'll find a way to take things out of context so they fit your Sherlock Holmes narative.

So basically because I haven't agreed with your thought logic, and because Rizzrack also didn't agree with you, your impressive detective skills have deducted that I'm an alt account of his, and using this thread to self-communicate,  well I'm sorry to dissapoint you Sherlock,  but you couldn't be further from the truth.

But hey lets put our money where our mouth is,  so since this thread is a fan of deals,  lets make a deal, I can prove that I'm not an alt account of Rizzrack, so how about a friendly wager of 0.1 BTC, escrowed of course.   I'm assuming since you already have it all figured out at this point it's easy money for you.

Sadly I'm gona dissapoint you and say I'm in no way associated with Rizzrack or saxydev, and most of all don't associate with any "groups" on this forum.

Thus the reason I'm posting from an alt account since I'm 100% sure that I'll be painted red, or the least neutral for even blinking at you,  and while Rizzrack has been posting from his own account, I'm assuming he's not worried about going into a fist fight with you over the way this thread proceeded since he has a high ranking account and probably has some support around here.


I still highly believe you influenced the direction of this thread based on your personal dislike or mostly cat fights you had with saxydev in the Romanian section.

I do however believe the new things that came to light, especially the XMR situation are relevant for a flag against saxydev, as I don't believe the whole story, and mostly can't really understand, as he can simply post the transaction key and stop with the syncing of the wallet and other bullshit.


The initial flag report due to that "deal" of giving proof of a service providing those services for free, especially since while initially accepting, he said NO DEAL, long before the other player came forward with some services,  simply shows that it went in the direction you wanted/started the thread cause both you and saxydev couldn't play nice in the Romanian section.




@c0ldbrewz I strongly believe you should create a separate Flag, as this one would actually be a legitimate one where you've provided him a service and he failed to pay ( I don't believe the whole I sent 3 weeks ago but your wallet has syncing problems story, since he can't provide the transaction key).

Somehow this whole situation seems like OP and saxydev have a beef and OP has simply managed to raise a mob due to his bitcointalk influence.

Yes this is an alt account ( from what I'm seing having a beef with GazetaBitcoin is enough enough to be marked as a scammer and Trust to be nuked), no I am not saxydev, though I am from the same region as him and OP so I did follow their beef in the regional threads aswell, here's my 2 cents though:

Saxydevs aml service:   While it's unethical ( assuming he has access to some free tools which are probably available to anyone with a thorough search on the internet) how does it actually qualify as a scam ?  Unethical sure, as he's charging for it, but then again seems like one of those scenarios where people download a free e-book, no copyrightes attached and sell them to others.

Saxydevs shill of Pi token: A shit coin ? 100%.  Turned out to be a scam ? Nope, simply a shitcoin that people have been "mining" with their phones for years, remember the ads about it for years now, looked recently into it as I've "mined" about 300 of those, which apparently are trading OTC at this point.

Regarding the Flag, it seems that while he initially said yes, after 20 minutes he went back on it, and said "no deal", so how exactly does that constitute as a broken contract when the other party of the "agreement" didn't come forward between those 20 minutes.

Are you basically saying that for example, I decided to buy a car, I call the dealership and tell them I'll buy X car, then I change my mind call them back and say I won't anymore, that I'm liable for it? That I've broken a contract and the dealership expects me to pay the amount regardless?


Now regarding GazetaBitcoin, I've honestly always considered you to be one of the highest standing members of the bitcointalk community (at least in the Romanian section) and have always followed your articles/interviews, and honestly this is simply dissapointing, you've established an online image here, and presence, and honestly you should do better!  Saying things like " Based on his IQ, which is a number lower than the one of his shoe size"   or "He just writes idiotic stuff and, together with his level of very low education reminds me a lot of another Romanian imbecile".  

While you ended your OP with:  Although I have no clear evidence that he is a scammer, you also stated in the same OP "the scammer is willing to make deals only through PMs or Discord, not in plain sight." or "the scammer alleges that he has thousands of BTC, ETH and TRX addresses"  so which is it, wasn't the Scam Accusations thread supposed to be a place for actual scams !? Isn't the whole format there for a reason?  Amount Scammed, Payment Option, Proof of payment, Pm, Chat logs? Why isn't this thread in the Reputation sector of the forum, where you could have actually made a case regarding this, supposedly without the "low iq, low education" and actually do a proper analisys as you're well known for on this forum? Why did you go about it as an angry middle schooler?

Most dissapointing aspect, why did most of the higher trusted members participating in this thread didn't call out OP on this, is this how the Trust system should work? How the flag system is intended to work?  Why did no one other than Loyce question it?.

OP: You might want to reconsider your standing and general image when you feel it's appropiate to call someone "a very low level of education" and "low iq". Since you are/were one of the most respected members here, you should do better!



P.S. - Yes I do expect to be considered saxydev's alt account due to not following the general mindset on this thread, I do believe saxydev's oppinions on segwit are dog poop, same as his belief in PI token,  and yes I also believe that this was massively mishandled by GazetaBitcoin and most of the people on this thread.  And yes, I am expecting to be blasted with red trust for it.