 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
Hello there, may be interested in this one, is there a min btc amount?
|
|
|
|
|
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Groupbuy Wallet: bc1qlpd45688hce39lusur8sdnuzy3z2dx4uvrgpkt
Return Wallet: bc1qekv533uq8fpgd5xtwcn9sv3gc45mw67f93rnwu
Your stake: 0.01 BTC
Reservation: -
Your TX: 1f29091f591b0df45ff3d9bceb80f2337e26a4815f95794cbf89a866dee2b5c8
Voting comment: 25 PH
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
|
Here we go again
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Groupbuy Wallet: 3KWE8HcunSfvfNBy3CdXZdQ2HyvierBxeT
Return Wallet: bc1qekv533uq8fpgd5xtwcn9sv3gc45mw67f93rnwu
Your stake: 0.01
Reservation: -
Your TX: f503658f826d8878d347a6e5bcfee04b2967be00f22bb1aec99902e9ff8094b3
Voting comment: 25
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
Oh thanks  I'll give a try to electrum. Also, got a Trezor One, can i assume there will be no issuea with that one right? Using a Trezor address is fine Nah, I just installed Electrum and change address to that. Dont know why, I though using Electrum was more difficult that it really is xD |
|
|
|
Oh thanks I'll give a try to electrum. Also, got a Trezor One, can i assume there will be no issuea with that one right? |
|
|
|
|
Guys quick question, until now i've always used the binance btc "regular" address for solo mining.
Since there is also an option to use "btc segwit" and the address is different, lets supose i mine a block, would it be a problem to use "regular" btc instead of segwit?
Which "wallet" do you guys use when solo mining?
|
|
|
|
are we ready to go?  |
|
|
|
Come on guys, this gonna be the one  |
|
|
|
Sure, I'm ok with 20-25 haha in other past runs u know I voted for that |
|
|
|
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Groupbuy Wallet: 3KWE8HcunSfvfNBy3CdXZdQ2HyvierBxeT Return Wallet: 15f5XNjS4WV4YjKT7FKFJV6mgSyGRBSBaU Your stake: 0.01 Reservation: - Your TX: afe7be7c8947c954dd8e828dc3ee06f5308159702f218839e5742408797c1fd5 Voting comment: 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Lets go for another one |
|
|
|
Great, good luck guys |
|
|
|
Cool, how much btc do we have? And the hashrate we will choose? Lets cross fingers |
|
|
|
|
Hello there
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Groupbuy Wallet: 3KWE8HcunSfvfNBy3CdXZdQ2HyvierBxeT
Return Wallet: 15f5XNjS4WV4YjKT7FKFJV6mgSyGRBSBaU
Your stake: 0.01
Reservation: -
Your TX: 0d35e9996be819f47aa3cb9566e5ce530f5a8828dd23320dc6fe7be2796c3abf
Voting comment: 25, 40, 50, 100
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
Great, lets see |
|
|
|
bestshare vs bestever
bestshare is the bestshare sinze the last block is found
bestever is youe best share ever found
best regards
Willi
Oh i see, thanks I've just finished paying fees for the pool server to run for another year. Given the number of blocks solved this year, I'd feel bad having the community provide funds to support its running. Let's see where we stand in a year's time again.
The Ckpool server is very far from Spain? He tells me that having the Pool server far away can increase the Ping, is mining from Spain recommended in Ckpool can anyone help me!? About this one, not sure if this is what you're looking for or if its still valid, but here you can see diff stratums, there is one for europe users https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Solo.ckpool |
|
|
|
Hello there, quick questions about the ckpool stats. I understand the obv hashrate params, but could someone explain me what do these params mean? I guess the bestshare is the closest one to "mine" a block? But I'm not pretty sure about bestshare vs bestever {
"lastshare": 1652874674,
"shares": 11897642822,
"bestshare": 414938470.4481227,
"bestever": 8006330690,
"worker": [
{
"lastshare": 1652874674,
"shares": 487014704,
"bestshare": 414938470.4481227,
"bestever": 414938470
}
]
}
|
|
|
|
Just checked my ckpool profile, and at preset turbo mode it judt hit 4.09TH What an amazing machine |
|
|
|
Groupbuy Wallet: 3KWE8HcunSfvfNBy3CdXZdQ2HyvierBxeT Return Wallet: bc1q9dkl86c4h7dhczlc2u2r33sn4w6ehk90eycaun Your stake: 0.005 Your TX: a9ea2a3371e1699589df46ada5e95cd64a9b7c426a4e1d9d4dbc494c926b8adf Voting comment: 25 PH |
|
|
|
Hi all,
I don’t know if this is the best place to ask. But it’s the only place I can think off.
I’m planing on buying a “21 Bitcoin computer” and planing to point it to CKPool.
Has anyone have experienced in this miner? And help or advice will be nice.
P.s Sorry ck if this question is not for this thread
Dude, there are better options. For ex the gekkoscience compac f is (with proper power and fan) 200-300GH, and also theres the futurebit apollo, which can work with a 200W psu to give 3-3.2TH (50-60x the 21 computer) I'm not telling your option is not valid, just that if we take for example the apollo, at 3TH according to solochance thats 1 in 76 millions every block (which is near impossible ha), but with 50GH thats 1 in 4,500 millions every block (Man, you have to be super lucky) |
|
|
|
~snip~
Thats awesome dude, about replacing the official psu, any 80+ 400-700w would be more than enough yup, but how will u tunning the parameters? The % power (up to 100%) and the second one?
I ended up getting a 750W PSU which doesn't even run a fan until 300W, so my PSU is now completely silent. Game changer for silent mining with this device. To tune the parameters first decide what you're after, for example the noise level of the fans you want to tolerate, or a specific hash rate you want to achieve. I've managed to get up to about 4TH/s for a few minutes but the noise of the fan and the heat produced was absurd. Personally I think this device is perfect for efficient silent mining at home instead of trying to get a massive hash rate with loud noise and heat. The fans will stabilize at their running speed in a few seconds, or couple of minutes of running. The hash rate will oscillate a bit more, so you might want to wait a bit longer to see the actual hash rate. Running it overnight should give you a nice stable hashrate reading. Here are the relevant options and their ranges: # board power - this controls power/voltage for the board in %. It ranges from 30-95. See presets and tuning guide below
# board frequency - this controls the hashboard's frequency. It ranges from 30-60
I would start first with the board power(brd_ocp) and set it to a level with acceptable fan noise. Once that's done, note the current hashrate. Then experiment with different board frequencies(osc) and see how it performs. As a reference, here are the values of the presets: # Preset Values:
# ECO: -brd_ocp 48 -osc 30
# BALANCED: -brd_ocp 60 -osc 40
# TURBO: -brd_ocp 75 -osc 50
For an absolutely silent mining operation (fan running at 1k RPM or so, basically inaudible compared to the quiet 2k RPM or so of ECO) set brd_ocp and osc to 30. You'll get about 1.3TH/s with no noise. If you want to go higher and keep the noise down, you can add more external fans running at very low RPMs. I'm in the process of designing this solution. Here's the "official" tuning guide from the Apollo binaries documentation(start_apollo.sh file): # Tuning Guide:
#
# The above three modes should be more than enough for most use cases, and it is not recommended to edit these unless you are an expert user and know what you are doing.
# It is normal for your hashboard to have up to 5% error rate, this is usually due to one bad chip producing lots of errors and won't affect your overall hashrate.
# The easiest way to tune your board is to simply increase or decrease the power %. If you see over 5% errors, simply start incrementing the -brd_ocp parameter 1-2 units at a time
# If you are seeing very low error rate (under 1%), you can start decreasing the power parameter to increase efficiency
# The software already has per-chip auto-tuning built in, so you should not need to touch the -osc frequency parameter, but you can play with this as well to determine the sweet spot for your board
# As mentioned above, the max power for standard unit with the included PSU is 75% (200 watts), do not go past this unless you have
Thank you Im currently running it 'turbo' mode and power off by night, but now if I manage to run it at 1.3 with no noise, man thats awesome, thanks |
|
|
|
|
