We are talking about gaming platforms that allow users to play casino games without having to wager real money. The goal here is to have fun and socialize with friends.
Social casinos look and function in the same way as real money online casinos. Players can play slot machines and classic games like bingo, poker, and roulette. However, instead of betting real money, social casinos use virtual currencies and points.
You may have to deposit a certain amount of money first, but playing on such platforms does not mean that winnings are paid to a debit card.
Not a bad idea for sure, although I don’t think you would have the best of experience towards gambling or should I say, gaming as this can’t be gambling since there are no stakes involved. You don’t stand the chance towards loosing anything or winning either. Most casinos do have this feature but, it resides in the demo mode, a means for you to know the game and how to operate it before seconding to play with real money. That’s also a result that could come off this social casino. Your success in playing on the social casino would be a motivation to go live with real money. |
|
|
|
If this fixture had been played before the game between Dortmund and Barcelona then I would have argue that Barcelona are going to win despite any odds but after seeing what Dortmund did to Barcelona on th return leg, they totally outplayed and outmatched Barcelona which means inter Milan can obviously do the same if they get the right mentality although I would argue that's it would be difficult to defend against Barcelona seeing how potent their attack line is but we are talking about inter Milan here.
There isn’t any argument about that, Barcelona was totally out played by Dortmund in the second leg. If they didn’t manage to score Barcelona as well as themselves, they would have found a way back maybe, with some time on their side you know. I don’t think Barcelona’s game plan was to win that game. For all they know, with a 4 goal advantage and the squad they’ve got, they’ve got to be confident that they’ve won and not really try to win/ they play it safe, lost and qualified. They would do what they need to do just to stay in the league. |
|
|
|
Its success is that it presents a practical example that a form of "money" without a central authority is POSSIBLE, and what made it possible is the way Satoshi implemented Proof Of Work - Make it difficult/expensive to edit/append the ledger, then at the same time make it rewarding if you're honest.
Satoshi probably wasn't a mere "programmer", but an actual scientist/mathematician who thought a lot about the game theory behind decentralized systems.
That’s definitely a way to look at it but then again, what’s success without mass adoption? There isn’t any success without mass adoption. It doesn’t matter if cryptocurrency serves as money or not. If it doesn’t retain all the qualities of money which the most important of it is its general acceptance, then it haven't been success as money. It’s a global currency and so should be accepted by a lot of merchants across the globe. |
|
|
|
Greed is not so much about the goals, but about the approach. A greedy person doesn’t think about possible losses, doesn’t protect themselves, and just hopes to “ride the wave.” So no, I don't think greed and risk-taking are the same.
Also, to me, a person who wants to sell at $150k is not greedy. It's a person with a price target and understanding of how far he is willing to go with Bitcoin. It would be greedy to instead not sell at $150k and wait for more and more, in my opinion.
$150 is a reasonable price, especially with the fact that Bitcoin has surpassed 100k before it dipped although, it took over a decade to get popularity and attain that number. Am extra $50k for the year doesn’t look like much although, I still try to maintain that we are most likely not going to get that price in this year. That’s not exactly a greedy price margins though, it’s fair but, price isn’t really a guarantor for sell. |
|
|
|
I still hope Ancelotti can stay longer at Real Madrid. But the club seems to have decided to part ways with Ancelotti in the near future. So yeah, it can no longer be avoided. And after Ancelotti leaves, maybe Real Madrid will appoint an interim coach first. And I'm not sure who it is.
There are several rumors related to Ancelotti after failing in the highly anticipated UCL quarter finals. Some rumors even say that: - he will leave Real Madrid after the Copa del Rey match - Real Madrid President will sack Ancelotti because of his failure in UCL and his performance in La Liga However, all of these are still rumors that may or may not be true. Source: Real Madrid manager Carlo Ancelotti Source: Carlo AncelottiIt’s a prestigious league, the champions league and it’s one league where Real Madrid makes their presence known and stamps their superiority. There weren’t going to always have it their way. Some team was always going to show them what it means to loose and that team was Arsenal in this season. It’s not enough reason for their president to wish to sack the man, he’s done well with the team and over confidence is what killed them when they played Arsenal in the second leg. Well, like you said, they are rumors. |
|
|
|
At this current phase, I will give all of them equal chance but still favours Barcelona more somehow.. Althpugh, if you check barcelona's game recently, they are not performing that well, look at Raphinha, he's been consumed by the vision of getting the ballon d'or and hasn't perform well for the club after he came back from Brazil. There should e some time to rest until then for Barca so maybe some improvements yet it's going to be another back-to-back week as they will be having another El-classico before the inter's game, that may affect a little too. Regarding Arsenal vs PSG, PSG do have some balls to and the outcome could be different..Deep down I want Barca Vs PSG in the finals  , ther's something I need to check  If you look at it, you really wouldn’t see Arsenal to be having much of a chance in this. I mean, they are not like the biggest teams out there and haven’t got any real history in the champions league. We can’t say the same for Barcelona or Inter Milan. PSG is one team that has some promises as well but then, Arsenal remains the one team to have done what many would have seen to be the impossible, beating Real Madrid home and away and did it very calmly. I would like to see them make history for themselves in this. |
|
|
|
I totally understand that there has to be a system in place to catch abuse, but it sucks when legit users get caught in the net too. I’ve seen some cases here that eventually got resolved, so I’m still hopeful mine will be too.
Just trying to stay patient and do things the right way.
Thanks for the message!
You know it’s normal that these things happens, ain’t no perfect systems out there and every now and then, some legitimate users gets caught in between but, the means to resolving this if it actually gets resolved at all is all that matters in the end. It’s one means to keep trust between gamblers on the gambling site they choose to gamble. For your sake, I hope your case gets looked at real soon and resolved in too, in the best interest of everyone. |
|
|
|
Thanks for your reply and questions, I appreciate it.
Yes, I used the deposited funds to place bets — mainly on tennis and sometimes basketball. I didn’t use any bonuses or promotions; I honestly don’t bother with those since they usually just complicate things.
As for the VPN — yeah, I realize now that it might be part of the issue. The thing is, I’ve had my VPN always on by default, it’s just how I operate day-to-day. I never turn it off, but I always have it set to the same country I live in, so I wasn’t trying to bypass anything or hide my location.
Just to clarify the timeline a bit:
I deposited 446 USDT and later 116 USDT. I placed some bets and won a little, which increased my balance to $1,338.08. Then on March 30th, I requested a withdrawal of 82.31 USDT. Right after that, I was prompted to complete KYC, which I did up to Level 4. A few hours later, I received a message saying “Functionality is restricted for this account,” and ever since then, I’ve had no access to my funds
It’s been over two weeks now without any reply from Rollbit support or compliance, even after multiple emails. I just want to get clarity on what’s going on and get my funds back. I’m not trying to do anything shady — I’ve only ever had one account, and I’d really appreciate any help resolving this.
Thanks again for taking the time to read.
It’s good to have you pay some attention to what is going on here and how your complaint is carrying, having to clarify the few I had to ask on this. It doesn’t always feels good or sounds good when you feel your at the right and then your funds been withheld from you neither do you have access to your account and for sure, there is always some reason to that. That however is why there is a support line to use in resolving most of these complaints. Well, there have been far too many similar complaints and possibly the prompt just having to flag most users with the slightest suspicion. Some users have however been through this and had their issues resolved: Thank you so much for your help. After I contacted compliance@rollbit.com, my account was restored. Thanks again! I see you just might have tried that already but then, I think those who got their complaints resolved quickly could direct you on just how to properly file in this complaint for a quick response. Hope they too are paying attention to this thread. |
|
|
|
Pls don't misunderstand, just an assumption: if Bitcoin were to reach $500 again today, do you think people would still be willing to buy?
In my opinion, it would have two implications. Firstly, it would likely have ruined many people's investments and life savings, considering those who bought in at $10k, $20k, or even $100k.
Secondly, it would reinforce the skepticism of those who don't trust digital currencies due to their perceived unreliability. So, if it happens, would you still buy it?
It’s a position that would bring a lot of skepticism and caution to the mind of investors. This would lead to people having to ask the reasons why it happened the way it did. Understanding this would greatly determine the decision of an investor either to continue buying or not. Perhaps the whales decides to liquidate and the weak hands joined in to liquidate. If there is nothing wrong with the foundations to the Bitcoin network, I don’t think it would stop me from buying. Perhaps I might take the opportunity to own an entire Bitcoin, maybe 2Bitcoins while watching how the market carries itself. |
|
|
|
I have heard people say a Bitcoin investor is greedy. Bitcoin investors always have plans on how they want to acquire Bitcoin, how long they want to invest, and at what price they want it to sell.
We were having a discussion and someone said he would sell his Bitcoin this year immediately the price gets to $150,000. Most people saw him as been greedy. They felt it was a greedy target since it was far above what they expect from the market this year.
Maybe I haven’t been around people with this mindset towards investing but, it ain’t really greedy if you actual have a plan towards how you choose to manage your investment. Something that might not sound quite like it is; having to speculate on price hitting $150k in this year especially in the current market condition. It really doesn’t add up you know but then, why sell this year… what really is it about that? I understand that in the end, it’s their investment but, if you are always going to buy again, I think selling when you can manage it isn’t really a good move. |
|
|
|
One of those friends was really against investing into BTC, saying that BTC will have no value whatsoever, and it is such a waste of money buying it.
The other one, however, said that BTC will be become a huge thing in the near future, and we should start investing into it.
Guess what? I listened to the one, who said that BTC will have no value, and here I am..
I could've changed my life completely, if I purchased BTC back in 2017 or 2018, and hold until now, but I did not..
In life, we are always presented with those choices, choices that could be life changing or threatening to our stability. Which ever it seems, it’s always up to us to choose as, they are always a line of caution. This practically places you in the position of loosing everything or gaining everything. I’m sure there are choices we aren’t making right now and for some of those choices, we might come to regret it in the future. What I consider to be of some worth effect is; How do we handle it after we’ve discovered to have made wrong choices? What’s the way around it for most of us. Do we just quit the way or we still pursue whatever potentials we feel it still has. All these is what defines how we go through our lives. |
|
|
|
You captured it really well. Too many people start trading because they heard someone else make it without considering the whole picture, thinking it's a short path to get rich. They overlook the hazards the learning curve presents as well as the mental discipline required to stay in the market. I agree that before ever spending a single dollar, research and good education should take front stage. Long term development and wiping your account in days might truly differ depending on your knowledge of risk management and the workings of the market.
There really isn’t anyone who would want to trade without having heard or seen someone else having to show that they’ve been successful in trading and got themselves some good living. Most things that are always not known to many is that; you never can tell if they are exactly telling the truth when they aren’t someone in your locality which is well known to you. Even when they are well known to you, some individuals could be much secretive and would go private on some or their major source of income. You end up assuming it to be what you know them to be engaged with, pressure yourself into doing the same and end up not archiving the same results as they do. It could really be different sources. |
|
|
|
Aston Villa could not have kept a clean sheet against a good scoring side as PSG although Villa did everything they could but luck is another thing that wasn't on their side and I some how blame Emery because when he saw the force Marcus Rashford was bringing to the team to get more goals he could have left him to be on the pitch and take off Rogers instead, they are getting into the game and PSG are now feeling the heat and he took off the England forward which to me I don't think it was a good idea.
At least Aston Villa played to this stage of the champions league, at some point before the beginning of this campaign I thought they wouldn't make it this far but their performance wasn't what we expected, they surprised everybody including the fans, it was a good fight. PSG should be mindful of how they underrate their opponent if not it will be the end of their struggle to get to the finals.
I don’t think today's champions league fixtures was about luck not being on either of their sides, not Aston Villa most of all. Aston Villa came into the game with much energy and started attacking from the very kick off. PSG was on the path to rest the game and gain some control which they did when Hakimi scored that first goal that deflected from the goalkeeper’s feet. Aston Villa was determined and tried to be out a little more and then conceived a second goal. I think that’s where PSG got them right where they wanted them. The team game afterwards went on a little slow pace but still, they hand to come out as they haven’t got a chance sitting back. Got their first break with Tielemans in the first half, should they have managed to get at least 2 goals in first half, they could have made out with something in this game. They got their second and third in the second half but all that and it wasn’t enough to get them equal on an aggregate. The first leg was where settled the scores. |
|
|
|
|
There is never any guarantee means towards site security and that’s to say, just any site could be hacked, especially for sites that have got several team as staff, doing the job of maintaining the site integrity at different times. There could always be one rogue staff with malicious intent which can always provide the back end towards every hack.
There are always an insider to most of these hacks and not so much of them occur due to random hackers finding a loophole or back door in the program or building of the site. It doesn’t always end in with how well you’ve built the site but, just whom do you have in your crew.
|
|
|
|
Why not change this way of thinking because there is no provably fair games. Know that when you are gambling, you do not have 50% chance to win but a far lesser chance to win. The gambling sites have higher chance to win. That is the reason almost everybody that is gambling is losing money while gambling.
Do not misinterprete house edge to manipulation.
I agree with you that probably fair doesn’t necessarily mean you’ve got a higher chance of winning but in fact, it means the opposite. You are always going to have a far lesser chance of winning I think. What’s there to understand is that, the rounds aren't programmed to work in a particular way but uses your input in its algorithm to produce a result. That’s for casino gamblers though, for the sportsbook gamblers, you don’t need a probably fair game because thief isn’t such thing. You just take your chances with a team of interest and a multiplier to go with it although, the odds too isn’t by design for the best markets to carry an enticing odd. |
|
|
|
The Europa League anthem was played instead of the Champions League anthem at the ceremony of the Aston Villa-PSG match. They shocked the audience in front of the screen. 😂
Come on, you don’t have to take it out on them like that. They know what league they are supposed to be playing at and can’t really believe they’ve endured the champions league so far. Still, it was a good game from them today, they gave it well enough of what they’ve got, almost got through you know. I don’t think we did see this coming from Aston Villa. So many missed chances is what sold them off today, from 2 goals deficit to 1, scoring 3 goals before PSG could even know it. Conceiving first in today’s fixture was one of their worst mistake. |
|
|
|
My bets always get rejected, I wanted to deposit and use this casino, but if every time I want to bet on a game, I get rejected like this, it is totally useless. The error is "Processing Failed
1 bet failed to process: Your bet was declined due to an odds change"
Don’t know why it is that your bet results in a processing failed error message but when it’s got to do with the differences in odds, it’s always up to you to set the necessary permission so. The site needs to be authorized to place bets despite changes in odds and you would have that one out of the way. That algorithm is put in place for those that are very mindful of what odds they intended to bet on. I always accept changes in odds on my end though, except I don’t want to bet no more or at all. |
|
|
|
I submitted everything required (ID, proof of address, and bank statements) and was verified up to Level 4 KYC. However, just a few hours after completing KYC, I received a message that my account was restricted due to “multiple accounts”, which I strongly deny. I only have one identity, one Rollbit account, and I’ve never used the site before creating this account in March. I’ve contacted ** support@rollbit.com** and ** compliance@rollbit.com** multiple times (March 30 and April 3), but I have not received a single reply. I've also tried reaching out via live chat, but unfortunately, I was ignored there as well. It’s now been over two weeks, and I’m still locked out of my account, unable to access my balance of $1,339.08. I suspect that maybe using the same VPN location on both my desktop and MacBook might have flagged something, but I always used the same country I live in. Either way, I believe this accusation is unfair and not based on proper evidence.  His a few things I didn’t get to understand from your narration. You did mention having to make two deposits in the amount 446 and 116 USDT which sums up to 562 USDT. You didn’t mention if you did gamble with the said amount and made some wins or not but then, you tried to withdraw 82.31 USDT before you were required to go through KYC and was locked out of your account with a balance of $1,338.08. It really doesn’t add up except there are parts to the storyline that you’ve streamlined for easy narration. Something I don’t get though; Why use VPN in accessing the Rollbit site if it’s functional in your jurisdiction? Like you’ve already predicted that, it could be the issue maybe, just maybe. Even then, I’ll suggest you reach out to the proper channels and hope they clarify you on what seems to be the issue. Just be sincere why staying your case and if their is any truth in it, Rollbit would do well to resolve your case just as they’ve done others with similar issues above. |
|
|
|
Did the posted before I had 2 merit added so it's correct only copied the wrong posting format but anyways, appreciated
That’s okay, just had to bring to your notice as I’m sure that must have slipped you. I’ve added 2 more to aid you on your journey through to Full member, good luck mate and see you out there. |
|
|
|
My Countdown to Hero Member Rank
Number of Merit(s) left: 14
Your count down to Full member rank not Hero Member rank and what your lacking is 12merits not 14merits. I suppose you did quote and edit hafiztalha’s earlier post which is normal but, you could have read it at the very least, after editing or uploading just to be certain you did it right and for the community here to know just what they are doing in boosting you to where you need to be. It’s no big deal though but, you should correct that to Full member rank and 12 merits count down. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
