Hi lightlord, I'dbe interested to help, if you still need someone... Sent you a pm.  IZANAGI has been selected to do this job. Thread should be closed now. |
|
|
|
|
Trading bitcoin for cash is easier and no one can track it. I sell btc and money is mine, no banks no shit
|
|
|
|
for 10,000 btc i'd buy you a pizza and hand deliver it to the other siide of the universe
Me too! BTW who sold him pizzas? And is that guy still holding bitcoin? |
|
|
|
|
Pbmining is working fine for me.
I dont think there is gonna be any problem with them in the near future.
|
|
|
|
You have not conducted enough trades, nor have enough of a trading history to be able to be sufficient trusted with 7+ BTC of a company's funds. What gave them the idea to let you manage the campaign (you also don't have any experience in managing campaigns, and barely have experience participating in signature campaigns), and what logic did they use to trust you with so much money?
The fact that you are holding the funds for the campaign should not be enough to give participants confidence that they will be paid after 30 days (or even after 10 days).
EDIT: you should use a trusted escrow provider to hold funds for the protection of the campaign.
This is how it stays for now. I have updated the OP mentioning that some members are worried about possible payouts. Anybody is free to take up the 10 day option or apply for the campaign next month. Regarding why they trusted me, only they can answer. I offered to create signatures, escrow and run the campaign and Eric accepted (later roslinpl made the signatures). Anyways, you will all find out in a month. Btw, Muhammad Zakir has been included in the campaign. why cant you tansfer funds to an established escrow? Send the funds to a real escrow and then after a month carra can handle the campaign. That should be good |
|
|
|
Update: izanagi has taken the position of being a campaign maintainer.
Congratulations izanagi. Hope you do a good job. lightlord,any updates on payment for full members? |
|
|
|
|
Hey, I am also interested in doing this.
I am usually online from : 9.30amGMT to 11.15amGMT and from 3.30pmGMT to 4.30pmGMT. I also come online at 1am GMT
|
|
|
|
-snip-
I have received the funds in this wallet 1FpLaKLmnC3mxCMeBiDiZRCRUdHd3yHnz4
The amount I have is enough to cover the total pay in BTC only if all the Full Members and higher makes 100+ constructive posts. In case the company runs into trouble and/or they do not provide the mining power for some reason, you will get the BTC amount only (not the 20% higher mining power).
---------------Message------------------
Funds for Cryptomine December campaign
---------------Signature-----------------
HCJh81VW0WD0C7WNQnsTZxJnlDgtyJkpOmM4Ty7E8bd3hzkQxXHHjj8japugrZqOvhN06D6zpQ82c/gWLEY/oYk=
------------------------------------------
--snip--
You have not conducted enough trades, nor have enough of a trading history to be able to be sufficient trusted with 7+ BTC of a company's funds. What gave them the idea to let you manage the campaign (you also don't have any experience in managing campaigns, and barely have experience participating in signature campaigns), and what logic did they use to trust you with so much money? The fact that you are holding the funds for the campaign should not be enough to give participants confidence that they will be paid after 30 days (or even after 10 days). EDIT: you should use a trusted escrow provider to hold funds for the protection of the campaign. thats what all of us are saying since yesterday! But this carra guy(a farmed account) wont give a shit. He LL just ignore everyone. People should stop advertising them! They are a scam! |
|
|
|
|
Carra is just avoiding all the accusations! He is certainly a scammer!
He is avoiding all the requests by members to escrow the funds to a trusted member.
STAY AWAY
|
|
|
|
If you still need an escrow I'm here  , you've only to send me a simple PM. Cheers, redsn0w Thanks, but at this point I think I have the solution. Anybody feeling unsure can ask for the reduced 10 day payments. The reduced rates are still the highest out there (pending the BIT-X announcement). Interesting , but why an users should reduce its payout because you don't want to use a real escrow ? I think it is not right , however good luck . -More work for me. -Getting earlier payment. -Can accomodate more members. Seriously, can I get the views of those that are actually in the campaign rather than a lot of sockpuppets and negative trust members (not directed at you)? Which asshole site gives 7BTC to a hero member who has never been seen around and was mostly active in giveaways thread? Carra join the scam accusation thread please. |
|
|
|
No sane person would send 7btc to an untrusted guy to manage a sig campaign. Aren't they worried about the campaign manager running away? After all, it is only a userid on a forum. The campaign is paying way above market rate and this is not the way to run a business.
The only explanation is they plan to sell as much hash rate as possible in a short period and run.
There can be a solution to this. We can ask a reputed member of the forum to threaten the users to not to join the campaign untill funds get transferred to a trusted escrow else they get a negative trust. Why would participants deserve negative trust? They would be the ones getting scammed. It is not 100% clear yet that the site is a scam so they wouldn't be advertising an obvious scam. the participants should get a temporary negative trust. They arnt advertising an obvious scam but they are obviously advertising a site that is a scam(most probably). They should be asked not to join the campaign till funds are held by an trusted escrow. I also wonder that whats the point of using carra as an escrow. Escrow agent is someone that is trusted. Here carra is someone who is not trusted and is a guys who is even less famous than me (ok, I am infamous). This whole thing just finished the point of trusting these guys because they have a so called "escrow agent". I don't think you understand the meaning of giving someone trust. Someone should receive negative trust if they are scamming or trying to scam. The sig campaign participants are not scamming, trying to scam nor are they promoting a confirmed scam. They are the ones likely being scammed. Someone pointed out on the signature csmoaign thread that carra is suspiciously making more decisions then would be expected. I would say that the account is likely a shill of the website. It was previously participating in the bitdice campaign so it was appearing to previously be active and not appear to be a purchased account. I checked the seclog yesterday and didn't find his account having his password changed in the last 30 days. I think what he is doing is unique and appears to be circumventing many "checks" that people will look for when trying to spot a scam. they seem to have a well planned scam. And the users should receove a negative trust because they are being assholes and are just fine with an almost obvious scam campaign. |
|
|
|
781
are you stoned? the giveaway is paused for now. |
|
|
|
|
I vote for redsn0w!
All the participants should leave the campaign till the funds gets transfered to someone who is trusted.
And vote for redsn0w.
|
|
|
|
No sane person would send 7btc to an untrusted guy to manage a sig campaign. Aren't they worried about the campaign manager running away? After all, it is only a userid on a forum. The campaign is paying way above market rate and this is not the way to run a business.
The only explanation is they plan to sell as much hash rate as possible in a short period and run.
There can be a solution to this. We can ask a reputed member of the forum to threaten the users to not to join the campaign untill funds get transferred to a trusted escrow else they get a negative trust. Why would participants deserve negative trust? They would be the ones getting scammed. It is not 100% clear yet that the site is a scam so they wouldn't be advertising an obvious scam. the participants should get a temporary negative trust. They arnt advertising an obvious scam but they are obviously advertising a site that is a scam(most probably). They should be asked not to join the campaign till funds are held by an trusted escrow. I also wonder that whats the point of using carra as an escrow. Escrow agent is someone that is trusted. Here carra is someone who is not trusted and is a guys who is even less famous than me (ok, I am infamous). This whole thing just finished the point of trusting these guys because they have a so called "escrow agent". |
|
|
|
I am just really surprised to see that carra(just a manager) is taking all the decisions related to the campaign. He can open up slots, he can choose people, he can change monthly payments to 10day/payment period. Something's fishy. I think he is paying less for 10days so that very less people choose for it and he wants people to join 30 day campaign. These guys just plan to sell as many gigahashes as they can in 30 days and then run away. Just assumptions https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=876473.msg9681359#msg9681359 |
|
|
|
No sane person would send 7btc to an untrusted guy to manage a sig campaign. Aren't they worried about the campaign manager running away? After all, it is only a userid on a forum. The campaign is paying way above market rate and this is not the way to run a business.
The only explanation is they plan to sell as much hash rate as possible in a short period and run.
There can be a solution to this. We can ask a reputed member of the forum to threaten the users to not to join the campaign untill funds get transferred to a trusted escrow else they get a negative trust. |
|
|
|
You can contact me, I have 5 more invites.
PMed you |
|
|
|
True that. No one would send 7BTC to a random user. But there are some things that are in their favour too - They did not accept all the participants and had a limit on the number of participating members(If somoeone was scamming then I think he would like to cause as much harm as he can). the 7 btc is probably all they have. If they accepted more members then they would need to "prove" they controlled more Bitcoin then they really have based on their rates.
One more thing is there, he is paying too much. The competition is less at this time and he is almost paying double what others are paying,so yes, it could be a possible scam.
They should send the funds to a trusted escrow.
any time someone offers to pay above market rates is almost certainly scamming and/or has zero intention of following through on their offer. I would say the site has a high probability of being a scam. The account may or may not be a shill (he could just be too dumb to ask that funds are actually in his control prior to him posting that he is in control of the funds) They can also be experimenting with this thing. They can run the website for a month and if they earn a handsome profit, they would pay the people, else they would run away(they wont have anything to loose as they would only be left with a non-profitable bussiness and a hero account that they most probably bought from somewhere). |
|
|
|
Yes, you need an invite for it. I requested for one like a month ago haven't heard anything from them yet.
Noone on earth has got an invite? Is google playing with people? I think they are still developing the inbox. :p Lol they are done with it and a lots people have em even more than just one. I saw many users selling them here in forums for 3-5mbtc, even someone was giving those for free but i missed it. i'd like to buy one. Can you please tell a link where they are being sold? ( someone selling them for cheap) |
|
|
|
Please mention in the topic of the thread that the campaign has been closed.
Isn't the red, bold, huge text, saying that there are zero spots enough for you to know that you cannot join in anymore? Do you even know what a topic is? To see those red, bold huge texts you need to open the thread, it would be better If you mention "[CLOSEd]" in the topic I.e the main heading of the thread. Read before you say something. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
