This is the oldest signature  (please post if you have a signature with an older address) -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
1E9YwDtYf9R29ekNAfbV7MvB4LNv7v3fGa
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1NChfewU45oy7Dgn51HwkBFSixaTnyakfj
HCsBcgB+Wcm8kOGMH8IpNeg0H4gjCrlqwDf/GlSXphZGBYxm0QkKEPhh9DTJRp2IDNUhVr0FhP9qCqo2W0recNM=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hi Hal! I see you got that Neuralink working. Looking forward to grab a beer with you in the future. Stay cool  |
|
|
|
Craig owns the database. Remember, it has illegal data in it, like child porn or something. Owner goes to jail? I mean, if you own the database, you own the content right? Can't own something that you don't own ... would be a circular argument.
Nope, wrong again He seems to own the DB SCHEMA, or the design/ protocol definition Not the content See the difference? There is no difference. Craig keeps making new stuff up, you have to be an absolute moron not to see it. Didn't Kim Dotcom have those exact issues ? Knowingly owning a database with illegal content ? Bitcoin is a server in Satoshi's basement? |
|
|
|
|
Agreed. Let the laggards lose.
|
|
|
|
Why I won't click on that article and why I won't care about faketoshi: 1) I know that your article will spill a bunch of bullshitery that focuses on the attention of the users. Bunch of gibberish words that doesn't even make sense in the first place. Maybe throw some facts so that people think it is legit. 2) Who dafuq listens to that scammer? Even if he doesn't have any solid proof that he is the real one, he still claims that he is. All I know is that he's probably one of the most insane guy in the world. Not read the article and then guess what the content is. Great strategy to stay ignorant. I feel like Ricky Gervais at the Golden Globe in this thread, lol. |
|
|
|
Small Block Segwit Man is at this stage:
|
|
|
|
restoring the original, unbounded protocol.
Horseshit. The original protocol did not require an Emergency Difficulty Adjustment. The original protocol wasn't so weak and feeble that it wouldn't survive without breaking the original consensus rules like that. Mess about with the formula all you like, you simply can't recreate all the vital parts that make Bitcoin what it is. If you want to talk about your forkcoin, there's an Altcoins sub for that. Stop defecating all over Bitcoin Discussion with your altcoin crap. AFAIK, the DAA will be restored later this year, but not at feb 4th. I can think of a good reason for that, but I will not share it. |
|
|
|
That includes restoring OP-codes that was chucked out by Core and bringing big numbers back.
So you agree that Satoshi was part of 'Core'? Because it was Satoshi that deactivated opcodes... no one else. Lol, you're an idiot. I don't care about you. We are building Bitcoin as it was meant to be, and we are not waiting for laggards like you. No your building a community of trolls end of........ Why would someone who say's they understand blockchain post an address of stolen MTGOX coins in a court paper.. Tulip Trust? More like IDIOT who didn't know what he was putting in these documents.... Page 9.... https://www.scribd.com/document/372445141/Exhibit-111FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.htmlOOPS... So he's a liar and a thief.. Don't waste time on revenge. The people who hurt you will eventually face their own karma.As a BTC bag holder, you should fear the utility of Bitcoin (BSV) more than the Tulip trust |
|
|
|
That includes restoring OP-codes that was chucked out by Core and bringing big numbers back.
So you agree that Satoshi was part of 'Core'? Because it was Satoshi that deactivated opcodes... no one else. Lol, you're an idiot. I don't care about you. We are building Bitcoin as it was meant to be, and we are not waiting for laggards like you. |
|
|
|
Why did he fork BSV when instead he could just work with BTC if he just own it?
CSW doesn't really look like he can code something extra ordinary like BTC, he can't discuss something that might just keep the interest of the BTC users into believing something or even just made us think he could be Satoshi but all he did is just claim he is satoshi. I bet he can only code a hello world script.
Bitcoin is not a computer program. Lots of CS-people get this wrong. It's an economic game with rules. Software is just a tool. Bitcoin is first the idea, written down in the white paper, it has a socio-economical consensus, a protocol design. True, once that needs to have a real world instance, some lines of code must be put down and computers need a program to run, here the problems are starting, cause bugs and limitations are nature of real word instances. It always helps to keep such as simple as possible, KISS. Segwit, LN, ... was the opposite Yes, I agree. Bitcoin SV is restoring the original, unbounded protocol. That includes restoring OP-codes that was chucked out by Core and bringing big numbers back. The complete Bitcoin script language is much more powerful and general than Core devs understood. It's like Forth, and most younger devs don't understand that you can unroll loops etc unbounded with Bitcoin script. With BigNum back, you can even do cryptographic math pretty effectively with fewer iterations. Bitcoin script wasn't made to give inexperienced devs a simple job, but to have something that scales to the world. Developers will probably use tools like this online interpreter to write bitcoin script in the years ahead: http://scrypt.studio/ |
|
|
|
Why did he fork BSV when instead he could just work with BTC if he just own it?
CSW doesn't really look like he can code something extra ordinary like BTC, he can't discuss something that might just keep the interest of the BTC users into believing something or even just made us think he could be Satoshi but all he did is just claim he is satoshi. I bet he can only code a hello world script.
Bitcoin is not a computer program. Lots of CS-people get this wrong. It's an economic game with rules. Software is just a tool. |
|
|
|
|
People with strong confirmation bias form echo chambers like this forum. It's a very bad investment strategy.
|
|
|
|
BSV is the only blockchain that scales, both for data and tx frequency. 3.5 hours to stresstest from now. Hobbyists are encouraged to play with BTC nodes on raspis. BSV is for business.
May I direct you to the Altcoin sub - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=67.0You may find that the peasants posters there may give you a warmer welcome than the gentlemen here. I'm sure the video I posted of the interview of BTC speculation guru Tone Vays is relevant for this thread? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
