 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
|
|
Gibt es in CoinTracking eine Funktion mit der ich die Namen der CSV- Dateien feststellen kann, die ich importiert habe? Leider habe ich in meiner Sammlung von CSV- Dateien mehrere Versionen von Reports verschiedener Börsen und habe mir nicht notiert, welche der Versionen ich importiert habe.
|
|
|
|
|
Die Listen mit den Trades, die man bei Bittrex herunterladen kann, sind unvollständig insofern, dass diort nur die Handelspaare enthalten sind, bei denen die gehandelte Währung an erster Stelle steht (z.B. BTC/XYZ). Es gab bei Bittrex jedoch auch Handelspaare, bei denen BTC an erster Stelle stand, diese sind in diesen Listen nicht enthalten, die Listen sind daher nicht komplett.
Auf Anforderung stellt Bittrex eine Liste mit sämtlichen Trades zur Verfügung, diese passt aber nicht in den Importer, die angegebenen Daten passen nicht zu den geforderten Angaben im Importer. Was kann hier noch getan werden? Wird der Importer nochmal daraufhin angepasst?
Dies sind die Daten, die in der Gesamtliste enthalten sind:
Uuid,Exchange,Closed (UTC),Opened (UTC),Side,Type,Time In Force,Bid/Ask,Quantity,Remaining,Total,Avg. Price per Share
|
|
|
|
|
Auch beim Import von historischen Transaktionen von Bittrex gibt es Probleme. Ich habe die von Bittrex zur Verfügung gestellten CSVs für Withdrawals und Deposits über den Custom Exchange Import importiert und dabei genau auf die Einhaltung der Vorgaben zu den Einstellungen und Parametern geachtet, es erfolgt keine Fehlermeldung. Aber die Transaktionen werden nicht im Bestand berücksichtigt. Was kann hier noch getan werden? Ich habe den Vorgang schon zweimal wiederholt, scheinbar werden hier Werte in die falschen Spalten eingetragen.
|
|
|
|
|
Beim Import von Bittrex- trades wurden Trades, die als cancelled markiert sind, nicht als solche erkannt und in die tradesliste aufgenommen. Wie kann ich diese Trades korrigieren? oder einfach löschen?
|
|
|
|
|
Danke dafür!
Weitere Frage: wie gehe ich mit dem Eingang von Coins von nicht mehr existierenden Börsen um? Muss hier für jeden Eingang ein Ausgang von der alten Börse manuell nachgetragen werden?
Wenn ich diese Coins dann verkaufe, müsste dann doch auch der Kauf auf der alten Börse nachgetragen werden, oder? Das kann dann doch nur geschätzt werden.
|
|
|
|
|
@Andreas_CoinTracking
CSV- dateien mit historischen Transaktionen von Poloniex können gerade nicht importiert werden, gibt es dazu eine Lösung oder einen Workaround?
|
|
|
|
ya the price has climbed nicely in the past day or so.
DGB is mooning - not just climbing |
|
|
|
Yessss! Still Wartung for my BIS to be Released from cryptopia!!! |
|
|
|
Does anyone have a List of servers for the clearnet electrum wallet available? I can‘t get a connection.
e1.verge-electrum.com (ssl Port 50003, not 50002) e2.verge-electrum.com (ssl Port 50003, not 50002) Thanks!!!  |
|
|
|
|
Does anyone have a List of servers for the clearnet electrum wallet available? I can‘t get a connection.
|
|
|
|
This is not hard pump, just buying and dumping small candles. I am confused.
Mega is a partnership, but when other coins are partnering banks and legit corporations is a partnership with Mega a big deal? It's obviously not a partnership, but MU just uses STORJ as one option to store the content. Everyone is free to use STORJ, not even a need for a partnership. But being used by MU will definitely help STORJ to more visibility and adoption. |
|
|
|
I would say that we will not hear or read anything before the end of GamesCom, where surely anyone, seriously involved in gaming, currently is stuck ballsdeep. Think about what you are saying. That would be the most valuable publicity opportunity, precisely the time we should be hearing from them. Exactly that, but for the gaming part of the project. "We" is the crypto part, which currently is not taken care of, at least not sufficiently. |
|
|
|
Also Spoke with Adam from Tokenly, he has been helping Augmentors from the start and also like myself, was trying his best to build a community and keep people informed. This morning i spoke with him to ask what is going on with the Augmentors Team. So this is it, this is as much info as i can or will ever get.  [img]https://i.imgur.com/hjZBByu.jpg[/ I would say that we will not hear or read anything before the end of GamesCom, where surely anyone, seriously involved in gaming, currently is stuck ballsdeep. |
|
|
|
XVG briefly touched 40 sats again today. Unless the Verge team makes some major business moves, this is a whale game until September or even as late as November.
Until then, expect more weak hands to be squeezed out of the market.
I agree with you . XVG market is whaling-driven and certainly will not rise in the next few months, which will make it possible for whales to buy a lot of the XVG and they will pump x10 in a short time. Just use that observation and get as many XVG as you can - easy Money then |
|
|
|
Is there a decent block explorer? The one under explore.sia.tech does not allow for search of specific transactions or addresses.
None of the two available blockchain explorers (the one you linked and http://explorer.siahub.info/ ) allow you to check addresses' balance. But both allow to check transactions: introduce the TxID on the "hash" field Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, the TxID is not recognized in the explorer (withdrawal from Polo). Could that be the old issue that Polo just doesn't submit the TX? Or was that solved already? Anyone else with withdrawal problems? Correct. If the TX is not shown in the explorer, is because the same old issue of Poloniex that submits the TX but it does not reach a block and needs to be broadcasted again. A lot of people keep reporting this problem. The rest of exchanges (Bittrex, Bisq) have already did their part and are not suffering this issue. Most of the times Polo's withdrawals just need some extra hours to reach a block and your wallet, just wait a bit longer. If after 1 or 2 days is not solved automatically, open a ticket in Poloniex. Don't use Poloniex as a recommendation, guys. Bittrex works flawlessly, for instance. Finally the coins arrived at Bittrex, it just took a while. If you have similar problems, just keep calm and don't panic, its just damn slow  |
|
|
|
Is there a decent block explorer? The one under explore.sia.tech does not allow for search of specific transactions or addresses.
None of the two available blockchain explorers (the one you linked and http://explorer.siahub.info/ ) allow you to check addresses' balance. But both allow to check transactions: introduce the TxID on the "hash" field Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, the TxID is not recognized in the explorer (withdrawal from Polo). Could that be the old issue that Polo just doesn't submit the TX? Or was that solved already? Anyone else with withdrawal problems? Correct. If the TX is not shown in the explorer, is because the same old issue of Poloniex that submits the TX but it does not reach a block and needs to be broadcasted again. A lot of people keep reporting this problem. The rest of exchanges (Bittrex, Bisq) have already did their part and are not suffering this issue. Most of the times Polo's withdrawals just need some extra hours to reach a block and your wallet, just wait a bit longer. If after 1 or 2 days is not solved automatically, open a ticket in Poloniex. Don't use Poloniex as a recommendation, guys. Bittrex works flawlessly, for instance. Thanks again, so I give them some time before opening a ticket - btw.: the withdrawal was from Polo to Bittrex because of the bad service and performance of Polo, this just confirms my decision! |
|
|
|
Is there a decent block explorer? The one under explore.sia.tech does not allow for search of specific transactions or addresses.
None of the two available blockchain explorers (the one you linked and http://explorer.siahub.info/ ) allow you to check addresses' balance. But both allow to check transactions: introduce the TxID on the "hash" field Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, the TxID is not recognized in the explorer (withdrawal from Polo). Could that be the old issue that Polo just doesn't submit the TX? Or was that solved already? Anyone else with withdrawal problems? |
|
|
|
|
Is there a decent block explorer? The one under explore.sia.tech does not allow for search of specific transactions or addresses.
|
|
|
|
According to XVG roadmap, they have about 6 features to be released within July 2017, we only have 2 days left for August and we still havent heard anything... that's a bad sign... if they postpone or dont fullfull their promises things might look bad
Really? Better releasing later a good piece of work than releasing in time with bugs. True: They could write a line about what is the cause of this delay, but: sometimes you work hard and have no time for a single line. Social media is a time-eater. Because when you write something, you mostly have to answer a lot of questions after that. And when you don't answer, the people evaluate it as a bad sign...  If they say July and it will come in harvest: Who really cares? I totally NOT AGREE with you. IF you are SERIOUS and you know that you cannot fullfill the JULY ROADMAP you DONT RELEASE THE AUGUST ROADMAP days before. If you really interest in xvg you would know that nothing is of schedule and everything will be released in time, so stop these "delays fuds". July is not over yet. I highly recommend today live chat with main dev sunerok he will certainly answer your questions. https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@alainite/crypto-live-chat-verge-xvg-join-our-live-voice-chat-q-and-a-with-verge-developers-cryptochatlive-comWell, I did checked the interview and all I can say is that I am deeply dissapointed. All JULY features will be released until tomorrow EXCEPT of the MOST important ONE, the RSK Contracts, that are not even in the August roadmap However, it was clear from the beginning that the integration of RSK- Contracts is dependant on the external testing with BTC, where its still in the testbed. So wait for RSK being finished with testing with BTC. |
|
|
|
I'd be happy to see it break 500-1000 SATs. $1? that might be years away.
I get what your saying, it's just that I've experienced this type of growth with other Coins that shared similar fundamentals to those of $XVG that it's very difficult not to see the same happen to this Coin - it's hard to ignore. Overall we're entering a different sphere of how things are evolving, and at the top of it all is "Technological Change". Look into Vernor Vinge's ideas about exponentially accelerating technological change. Really cool ideas that might help one to see that the $1.00 mark is not as far as one might think. $XVG to $1.00 We already come from far, considering that only recently XVG was priced in the single Satoshi area. $1 may be too far- fetched for now, being realistic, I would be happy with a break of the 500 mark mid- term |
|
|
|
|
