Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
I threw 3 btc at this thing. C'mon guys, think for a second -- if they had an open live demo, Jihan Wu's crypto ninjas would have already been there setup to murder everyone, steal the rig and reverse engineer this thing enough to put the Akutan Zero fighter plane in WW2 to shame.
Just kidding, I totally regret my purchase. Wish I did any research first.
|
|
|
Yes, the CC2.0 release will make existing coins and circulating coins the same number, and future coins which reward folding will be paid out from the coinbase rather than the premined folding pool tokens. Hi Vorsholk, This is a new mention to me. Can you please describe what you mean by coinbase? Surely you don't mean coinbase.com Will these not be in a premined folding pool?
|
|
|
I actually seen a post by a group known as "delta v" it was PND ....
Because everything you read on the internet has to be true, right? imo, 1 buyer started a FOMO buy run, which in turn had hodlers dumping at the ath - no more, no less ... look @ the chart now.
You mean the one that is still 1500 sats above what it was 4 days ago? I'm guessing that you didn't take into account the bajillion coins that got transferred into exchanges, and dumped, after the rise, when you did all of this "analysis" and came to a conclusion of "PND". No it's definitely confirmed. Only 78 members did that much damage. Pretty crazy.
|
|
|
I think bittrex will not delist, they never delisted cure even when there was low volume because it is a cause-coin. i hope it stay this way
Bittrex actually flags coins that are in threat of being removed due to low volume. CureCoin was once in threat of removal from bittrex but after an increase in volume the flag was removed. Curecoin did NOT have low volume on Poloniex, which is why this is so confusing. More about bittrex's coin removal process: https://bittrex.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/221621028Edit: CureCoin tweet wants our help to see it relisted: https://twitter.com/CureCoin_Team/status/854551650433892352
|
|
|
I'm not selling, storing it away. Better this than poloniex running off with everyones' crypto like other exchanges have eh?
|
|
|
Where's the source for that? ...
Mod talk in the trollbox. All the delisted coins have the same chart pattern as cure. I think they've obviously done a well played pump and dump. Polo was always shady like that. Meh.
|
|
|
Really odd that poloniex is delisting all those coins (including curecoin); they all have a high amount of volume (at least recently).
Their answer is that volume doesn't matter, the devs refuse to make it useful (in other words, all these years later and you still can't spend it). Where's the source for that? Lack of volume has been the only reason for a coin's delisting. They may be averaging the coin's volume over the span of several months rather than just the past week, is my guess.
|
|
|
Really odd that poloniex is delisting all those coins (including curecoin); they all have a high amount of volume (at least recently).
|
|
|
So currently in circulation is ~8,900,000 Cure
Thank you for the prompt answer. This would mean that CureCoin actually has a much lower USD market cap than is being reported by coinmarketcap.com correct? (By your numbers, curecoin's actual market cap is ~$1.1 million USD as opposed to the coinmarketcap.com's reported $3.3 million USD). A dynamic web page that readily displays this transparency and payouts from the premine wallets on the main curecoin.info website would be ideal, what kind of programmers would we need to hire to develop this said web page? I wouldn't mind investing some $ on the side for this said web page to be developed... I believe this is a largely underestimated missing aspect of CC 1.0's presentation. Regardless, CureCoin may be seeing some consistent $ signs for once. Great job guys.
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me how much curecoin is actually in circulation (excluding the premine+POS)? I know focusing on CC 2.0 is more important, but that data ought to be easily available on the main website, including payouts etc. How do I see this transparency?
|
|
|
Any dev updates? CURE's future sure is looking bleak compared to the other alts.. damn wish I had thrown that $ at dark/dash
|
|
|
A sick excerpt from a PDF that I found (I think you have to pay for the full copy https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233770794_The_Protein-Folding_Problem_50_Years_On), you guys should tweet or something: The Protein-Folding Problem, 50 Years On - 23 Nov 2012: Is the protein-folding problem “solved” yet (69)? We believe it is no longer useful to frame the question this way. Protein folding is now a whole field of research—a large, growing, and diverse enterprise. A field of science—such as physics, chemistry, or biology—is bigger than any individual research question. A field is self-perpetuating; a few old puzzles generate more new puzzles. For the field of protein physical science, the future is at least as compelling as the past. Here are some of the unsolved problems: We have little experimental knowledge of protein-folding energy landscapes. We cannot consistently predict the structures of proteins to high accuracy. We do not have a quantitative microscopic understanding of the folding routes or transition states for arbitrary amino acid sequences. We cannot predict a protein’s propensity to aggregate, which is important for aging and folding diseases. We do not have algorithms that accurately give the binding affinities of drugs and small molecules to proteins. We do not understand why a cellular proteome does not precipitate, because of the high density inside a cell. We know little about how folding diseases happen, or how to intervene. Fifty years ago, the protein-folding problem was born as a grand challenge of basic science. Since then, our understanding has advanced considerably. And, outgrowths of protein folding include the commercial development of new computers, such as IBM’s Blue Gene; new modes of citizen science, including Folding@Home and Foldit; the development of communal scientific competitions, such as CASP; a database of now more than 80,000 protein structures; the Moore’sLaw advancement in biomolecular simulation forcefields; new areas of materials science based on foldable polymers; and a foundation for understanding whole new classes of diseases—such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and type II diabetes, called folding diseases—that were not even known when the protein-folding problem was first identified. In times when there are pressures on science budgets for immediate payoffs, it is worth repeating the well-worn point that untargeted basic science often pays off in unexpected ways.
|
|
|
Just for fun speculation, it sure is unusual to see curecoin hold a price this high for this long, appears to be climbing too. 4 day chart: http://puu.sh/tHzgE/0cfd0578dd.pngIt's flatlined now, I'm panic holding as usual but I expect a steady drop from here.. surprise me curecoin!
|
|
|
You'll send the Cure coins to a burner address in exchange for the new coin...
Yeah, cuz no one has ever gotten screwed in a process like that before. With what crypto did people get screwed over for that? Anyway, I trust the devs' intentions in terms of them wanting to see their technology succeed. Screwing people over with the burner address is not what anyone's concerned about. If anyone's concerned, it's over the devs' competence from what I read in these threads.
|
|
|
The older version will be supported? What are the indicative dates of transition to a new coin?
You'll send the Cure coins to a burner address in exchange for the new coin. Nobody knows its release date, its been in development for how long now? 2-3 years?
|
|
|
The price jump the last 2 days has been nice, but it's still not enough to make my 1070s competative on Curecoin profitability to ETH. Right now that would take a jump to over 11k satoshi (8c per Curecoin or close, perhaps 7c after factoring in the tiny FoldingCoin value since that coin dumped out HARD this past month). I'm not in Ed O's league (yet or even all that close) but I could easily exceed 7 Million PPD on 24 hour average (and might be able to push with just my current 1070-based rigs if I had the incentive to do so. Unfortunately, I need the money for living expenses and electric so I have to chase the higher profitability coins. Interesting, that's very good to know. So as it seems, the current folders of curecoin are all about charity + gambling/speculation. So a higher curecoin price + volume is a sure way to get the higher PPD for science.. we need to work on building that economy.. some how. It'd be nice if a dark market would pick curecoin up just as they had done with XMR eh? That's the only quick fix I can think of..
|
|
|
|