interested in the PS4, any pics with timestamp? also do you accept escrow?
Escrow works like this or wat Buyer sends funds to the escrow, escrow verifies funds. Seller sends the package, buyer verifies package has been delivered. Escrow releases funds to seller.
|
|
|
Do they taste good? Because I only buy casascius coins if they taste good.
|
|
|
Is this service still available?
Just send to the address to find out
|
|
|
Why not auction it since you're confident about its value?
+1 to this idea, lets put our money where our mouths are. I'm sure there would be a lot of interest.
|
|
|
I think if you said 8/16 spots were available, and let people choose the spots they might be more interested.
Just my two cents if that helps.
|
|
|
Better photos added. The hosting site re-sized and I didn't check.
I'll take postal money order, BTC, face-to-face. I'll even give you my ID. I'm a legitimate seller.
Best offer you'll probably get is like 1.2 BTC to 1.3 BTC in the condition this is in, but more people should feel free to chime in. Also those ebay listings are for the 2011s not the 2012 like the one you have pictured.
|
|
|
.8
cant believe I got such a steal here -Txid: f810a884dd6ce0dd87d48d0effe8021e7034159828bf535f82ed5991056c8e96 please can you ship with my other order to MinerJones. thanks dude. well, I'm happy you got a good deal. In retrospect, maybe not a good idea for an auction to end during the superbowl Sending you a pm now. Thanks tman. Sent from my iPhone. Maybe add a couple more days next time. I didn't realize this beautiful auction happen under my eyes.
|
|
|
eh screw it lets do it 0.7BTC
|
|
|
I'm selling one great conditioned BTC Brass Series-1 coin with 1BTC loaded in November 2011. Tracked free shipping. Price: 2.8 BTC. You can also make me an offer in USD/EUR. Send me an e-mail or private message. The Series-1 coins are defined by a spelling error on the hologram: the smaller-print "Casascius" is missing the first "s" and reads: "Casacius". Quoted for image.
|
|
|
Too many people have been screwed on preorder stuff going wrong here.
Get the item, get the pictures, get a good escrow.
|
|
|
can I raise the bid to 3 mantises?
|
|
|
2016 Bitpiece Brass Quarter MS-68 (Loaded) Asking .45BTC 2016 Bitpiece Brass Quarter MS-68 (Loaded) Asking .4BTC
Hey blazed, I noticed a little something there
|
|
|
I don't think there is an inefficiency in the market. The 0.1 coin just sells better because it is more affordable and thus has a higher sales range. There are many people that would like to own a Casascius coin, but not everybody can spend 1 BTC for it. My opinion Not quite true, the multiplier is exactly what you've stated it is for each coin. The truth is that there doesn't have to be the same multiplier between different types of coins but each coin does have a multiplier if people are willing to play more than face and a buyer can use that multiplier range to arrive at a fair bid/ask price. E.g., you list the multiplier for the silver singles at 2-4x and the brass singles at 1-2x...two different types of coins, different mintages, etc. It's fair that these multipliers would be different. And in this example the silvers have an active mintage of 1292 and the brass range in the 5000-6000 range. To MY example, a better test is if the multiplier between two coins with the same active mintage differs greatly - Sliver tenths and Silver halves (2013 series 3) have nearly the same mintage, yet I bet the tenths have a significantly higher multiplier across most sales. Just doesn't make sense to me...it's an inefficiency in the marketplace. Why do these tenths always go for significantly higher multiple than the halves or full coins?
It's never made sense to me. A silver half will go for 0.95 yet this tenth is already up to .3.
Beautiful coins. The market is always hot but so hard to predict.
What minerjones said is definitely true. But I think it's also important to note that with funded cryptocoins, there is no such thing as a face value multiplier to get to the market value. Cas silver singles ranged between 2-4x while brass singles range between 1-2x. So rather just think of it as supply and demand for the current value EDIT: I just realized another reason why the run-up is higher with the tenths, particularly with auctions...it could be driven by the minimum incremental bid. The increment for a whol coin is usually BTC0.1, whereas this auction is at BTC0.05...50% of the minimum increment for a whole coin, yet the coin for this auction is a tenth of the face value! To get a fair bidding situation we'd need the minimum incremental bid for the tenth to be at BTC0.01. Yup. Not only is it one of the rarest editions of Casascius but it's a smaller denomination which makes it more obtainable by more people, thus driving the price up. Please never mention multipliers, they are just the premiums. I used to see silver singles at 3.5, now they're at like 2. Or a 1 to 2.5 BTC premium. Also for 25 BTC casascius coins go for about 26-27 so it wouldn't make sense to say there is a 1.04 multiplier rather than just say a 1 to 2 BTC premium. Multipliers don't matter, whatever the market will pay as a premium does matter.
|
|
|
I'd be interested.
I'm only bummed that I didn't win anything from the last one, but all is fair in gambling. TMAN put his money where his mouth is and it paid off, so it doesn't bother me.
|
|
|
Looks like tman wipes the board with that EA, lets see if he'll get the last prize
hash: 0000000000000000027fc54f64885687276639f7221b88d332c4a929205f32ea
|
|
|
tman might clean us out with that AA
hash: 000000000000000002ad1d1f08592826b5d517e70444f29eb4127ccc8085e6aa
|
|
|
|