|
Today the first day of wave ICO i get a new rank in bitointalk - Full member ,
To the signature campaign manger
would you please update BTCdoaA rank to full member share (1.5) in google spreadsheet
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
i don't think eth will reach the stage of bitcoin soon, many of eth supporter say the price will go up to 100 USD very soon ,look at the markets of eth now and compare it.
|
|
|
|
|
2-5 weeks ago i can not imagine or believe that ETH will be sold under 0.02 again what a risky investment .
what the reason for the price drop anyone know something here
i am still holding but also afraid to see eth under 0.01 in the next week
|
|
|
|
|
This is the fastest airdrop i ever seen in my life , what is Fpos means fixed proof of stake is this anew feature here or some other coin adapt that
|
|
|
|
how many hours exactly remain for the 20 percent first day bonus?  best luck 21 hours more or less Waves ICO will commence on April 12, 2016 and end on May 31, 2016: ICO website: ico.wavesplatform.com The total tokens supply stands at 100 milllion. 15 million tokens are reserved for bounties and the development team in the following proportions: - 1 million tokens will be distributed to early supporters. Please check additional details below. - 1 million tokens are reserved for post-ICO bounties. - 4 million tokens are reserved for strategical partners and backers - 9 million tokens are withheld by the development team. The remaining 85 million tokens will be distributed in lCO procedure to participating users based on their contribution in the total amount of the raised funds. The sale procedure will be taking place at a special crowdsale website. There will be discounts for early participants based on the following schedule: - First ICO day bonus. Users who buy WAVES tokens on April,12 receive a bonus of 20% - Users participating in the campaign before the end of April (April, 13 - April, 30) receive 10% bonus. - May, 1 - May, 15 buys receive 5% bonus. ICO ends on May, 31. After the ICO is over tokens can be withdrawn from the ICO platform. Thank you plenty of time to catch the 20 percent bonus i think we have a good start than lisk ico in the first day |
|
|
|
how many hours exactly remain for the 20 percent first day bonus? best luck |
|
|
|
|
if you set agoal of 11 BTC out of 7 BTC it would be possible if you stay away from gambling and just use long trading for trusted alt coin only like ETH ,RAD , XMR,DOGE,DGB just wait for 1-2 two month by that time 11 BTC will be reached easily.
|
|
|
|
Buy valorbit from bitcoin  give me all of your valor and I will pay you BTC really?available escrow?i have 240M val 0.01 BTC for 240M valor, agree ? sorry i not agree,i bought valorbit in 1 satoshi at march,i get valorbit not from give away.thank you 0.025 for your 240 M PM if interested you go first or we have to use trusted escrow if agreed |
|
|
|
|
only 0 0 19 hours 3 03 1 for the first day bonus
|
|
|
|
gosh! too many pages to read.
Any big news worth reading?
Ico site has started. Click here: http://ico.wavesplatform.com/EDIT: BTW, Wasn't there 3 guys when you clicked on "the team"? All I see now is sasha and tosch. Anybody? Thank you for update the counter is moving down waiting for it, best luck |
|
|
|
|
in 2016 if look deeply through the payment made in the internet you will find 60-70 percent goes in bitcoin
By 2020 we can reach 90 percent specially if the value of bitcoin raise up.
|
|
|
|
May a newbie like me can apply for the signature campaign or do I need a higher ranking?
Member ++ for signature campaign |
|
|
|
With alot of BTC trapped in the LISK ICO until after april, i'm not sure we'll see that volume. I think alot of people were going to dump some of their LISK on the 11th to invest in the waves ICO.
But LISK is delayed, it won't be released on 11th April.. for those who wanted to sell a portion of their LISK to join the WAVES ICO, they still can, but without the bonus, unless WAVES ICO is delayed too or make another good bonus on May. Many of lisk ICO participants already fed up with the delay mentioned but who knows we might have new members who not participate in lisk ico |
|
|
|
STOP BUY VAL FROM DOGE,LTC AND USD PLEASE.THIS WILL KILLED THIS COIN.START BUY FROM BTC
How much BTC have you invested for valor ? i have 350M valorbit but i dont sell if this price not better Damn that's alot..350M is already on your external wallet or still on the website? If the price is 1sat/val you have earned 3.5btc..but who want to buy those 350M Val?  maybe not now,but someone will buy for sure..i am still holding 30m val, bcoz i earned it without cost,so i want to take the risk and keep my coins to cold storage for 1 year..if i price is rice to 10 satosi in 1 year,i'll earn a lot from my valorbit Take the risk? Risk of what lol...you got it for absolutely free so there is no risk for holding this coin unless you bought it before. i want sell maybe at 3-4satoshi guys. Now i save my coin at my wallet  This is a reasonable price 1-11 sat . there is no risk at all to hold your coins because it s free or you get it very cheap in doge market |
|
|
|
Realize one thing: the XCR in the Lisk ICO fund can only be of value for the Lisk team if somehow XCR keeps value. That's an incentive for the Lisk team to keep supporting XCR. And because they can't just dump 80% of the XCR at once without disturbing the market and losing value, they will have to support XCR for a long period.
In other words: if Lisk drops XCR, their ICO stake of XCR would become worthless.
That's one of the reasons I took a gamble and bought up some XCR.
Totally agree . lisk is worthless if XCR value is dropped at once |
|
|
|
 The Valorbit HD Multi coin Wallet has just been published on Google Play. https://goo.gl/aoncHrThe info will go on the Valorbit forum, download page, roadmap and the social accounts. It is open source, based on Coinomi, and the source shall go on GitHub. Some community members may want to add as receiving address the one on the mobile. It should be safer (provided the passphrase has been stored offline) to keep the valorbits on the HD wallet than directly on online exchanges. As it has been posted before the transfer to external addresses will be executed soon. We shall give few more days for this info to reach the people. The next technical addition in the works would be the iOS wallet. Very soon we shall add on the roadmap 1-2 higher level business projects that build on the existence of mobile wallets and the online payments protocol (BIP70). I am waiting for you to talk long time ago ,it is very good to see some progress going on not a problem at all if VAL going with a baby steps. hope you will inform VAL supporters a bout any progress will be made and it is useful if we have weekly update about those project Good luck |
|
|
|
Hey,
1. Why create a new token/blockchain? OpenLedger for example already has fiat integration and the possibility to create assets. There are other coins that also offer colored coins functionality. Why not add your dev team to an existing team and make something already working even better?
2. Why not just continue to use NXT? What is wrong with NXT that prevents you to add fiat tokens and reputation systems to it.
3. The Dev team gets all the money from the ICO, plus 9M tokens? You're essentially being paid twice. There is no coin burning... You have to agree that from a certain point-of-view this looks like a money grab and a get-rich-quick plan. If the devs want to profit further from their work, why don't they buy the tokens they want themselves, with what they're being paid from the ICO? I'm sure we're not talking about modest salaries here. I wouldn't be making this point - a cut being reserved for devs - if there was no ICO.
4. There are plenty of bots around to make money on exchanges, market-making etc. Why don't you put some of those to work with a part of the ICO fund to support the 'post-ICO bounties', instead of reserving 1M?
5. '4 million tokens are reserved for strategical partners and backers' - could this be more transparent? 'partners and backers' would usually buy their way in, no? I'd love to see examples, even if you don't mention any specific 'partners and backers'
The comparisons with Lisk ICO are inevitable, but I'm not sure this will even get close to the values there...
1. As far as I know, OpenLedger is based on the BitShares's "market peg" idea. BitShares differs from WAVES in two fundamental ways. First, its consensus algorithm is DPoS, meaning that only a given number of "delegates" have the power to validate blockchain transactions, as opposed to the PoS consensus where each full node is accredited for validation. This means that the WAVES platform supports full decentralization whereas BitShares team is not taking a step out of their "delegated" version. The second difference is the feasibility of the "market peg" approach. This is of course open to discussion, but one may objectively evaluate the success of that approach by looking at the history of their most praised market pegged crypto-asset, namely, BitUSD. I doubt if any big corporation in the future will ever decide to rely on the idea "if everyone thinks something is worth 1 USD, then that thing is forced to be worth 1 USD." Corporations demand guarantee, and that guarantee may only be given with a fully reserved crypto-fiat, which is the case for CoinoUSD of Nxt, for example, whose success is indubitable. Now the WAVES platform goes even further from where Nxt leaves us. Thus, it is because of what makes the WAVES team unique, that is, because of our vision (I'm not a part of the dev team but I fully share their vision) that no other crypto-platform initiative could comply the possibilities that our platform will provide. I believe that the principal of these possibilities is asset-to-asset trading. I myself posted about this in many forums, asking why there is no such feature. The general reaction was that this is a bad idea because it goes against the nature of the blockchain technology. In their view, allowing "crypto-fiat to crypto-asset" transactions would destroy the use of the underlying coin on which the entire system is based. For instance, if people are able to buy a crypto-share of a crowdfunding project without being obliged to buy BTC, that would reduce the demand for and liquidity of BTC. But that is the cost of unleashing the power of the blockchain technology. Restricting the network would do no good for the ecosystem. Conversely, even though our approach will create a less demand for the underlying Waves-coin, it will make the mass adoption possible, and it will enhance the use of the blockchain technology. 2. The discrepancy in the visions of the crypto-initiative teams, as I said, is the main cause of why the WAVES team cannot work for improving an existing system. This goes same for the Nxt as well. You may read Nxt Forums; there are tons of discussions about which way to take. As the Nxters are insistent on their approach, the WAVES team has been obliged to draw their own way. I will leave the other questions for someone who knows more than me. Thank you for this i like to read and get more knowledge when people technically discuss something new lesson in review good luck waves |
|
|
|
Having problems with digibytetip.com. Accounts not updating. Recent tips and deposits not showing and account not updating balances. Anyone else having this issue?
I just create account confirmed with email and facebook how can i receive tips inside my wallet is it daily or once in a time thanks |
|
|
|
sell, sell to get money = 0.00000001 $
OK I will buy from you. me too if he has more than 50000000 PM with your address |
|
|
|
Do i need a bitcoin wallet for ipo like the iota ipo? Or can i send the btc from an exchange?
I'll take a wild guess and say : I don't think so. From my understanding you can withdraw your ICO tokens from the ICO website to the NXT AE, or redeem them from the website. Waves is not directly tied to the BTC blockchain. Note that this is not an official answer, just my thoughts. Yes, you'll be able to buy using any Bitcoin wallet. We'll do a usual Bitcoin merchant interface, with an individual generated address to send to. dev, Will you be using any of the ICO money to set buywalls - in case it falls below ICO price), when it gets listed on exchanges? No need for that if all ico members refuse to sell under the ico prices |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
