Can anyone confirm than zpool.ca makes any payment? Ive got around 24 hours of mining there and their api says:
{"currency": "HAL", "unsold": 0.6944121581305, "balance": 4.46162589, "unpaid": 5.15603805, "paid24h": 0.00000000, "total": 5.15603805}
I went on Altminer.net pool and after around an hour, infos from the api:
{"currency": "HAL", "unsold": 0.1277844123481, "balance": 0.00000000, "unpaid": 0.12778441, "paid24h": 0.04665941, "total": 0.17444382}
Just want to know if zpool.ca makes their payments? Thanks!
zpool is designed to pay out in BTC, so they go through an exchange process. If they can't exchange to enough HAL or any other coin, you have to wait... and wait... until enough HAL has been mined to clear their minimum BTC conversion, whatever that is. Altminer on the other hand will pay mined coins directly to your wallet every 2 hours. |
|
|
|
Have nicehash included this coin?
**** U AND UR NICEHASH **** ! Just to think how nice, quiet, and kid-friendly the Halcyon thread was until you came along...  |
|
|
|
You are sure work on port 4233 ? .
Yes, just make sure you have the -p c=HAL after your coin address. altminer doesn't have a dedicated port for HAL. |
|
|
|
|
Cryptopia bid is up 400x from just a month ago; 7+BTC traded just in the last day. Someone (has to be the same person) placed identical 250HAL tranche bids all the way down to 1500 sat.
Miners just threw over 2GH/s at Halcyon a half hour ago, diff is over 20. 4 year old coin, 10min block time, wallets haven't been updated in moons... go figure.
|
|
|
|
Where've you been?  It was on the front page for a long time, you just never scrolled down below the Ethereum fold.  I'm throwing some mining power towards this ... late but I think it still has hope
What's late?  PoW diff 6 instead of 1.5-2 just a week ago, so yeah, ~3x less than you would've had. |
|
|
|
What does this mean? will my coins get changed into some new coins? Of course not. Just means you need to download the new wallet, and the blockchain will have some new tech goodies built-in after block #1220000. S'all good. |
|
|
|
Hello Ghostlander Plus cryptopia not generating any PXC deposit address
I've tried to get Cryptopia to update the addnode list, they haven't replied to my support request several days ago. Not sure whether their addnode list has to be updated, can't hurt though. Their number of node connections drops to zero periodically, so nothing can be transferred. The other day there were at least 6 other nodes listed and I could generate an address, but today no connections are listed again... These are the pingable nodes I have that are consistently up, however it doesn't mean all have phoenixcoind running (except for ghostlander's three nodes of course): addnode=prometheus.phoenixcoin.org:9555 addnode=menoetius.phoenixcoin.org:9555 addnode=atlas.phoenixcoin.org:9555 addnode=162.217.250.114 addnode=185.53.128.119 addnode=74.65.234.126 addnode=72.78.100.7 addnode=185.26.124.95 |
|
|
|
Anyone know which pool is suddenly takeing all the blocks? Altminer has dropped considerbly in block discovery, and none of the other listed pools are getting any at all. So whos the theif!   |
|
|
|
|
Informed Cryptopia that PXC shows 0 network connections; gave them a working current addnode list:
addnode=prometheus.phoenixcoin.org:9555
addnode=menoetius.phoenixcoin.org:9555
addnode=atlas.phoenixcoin.org:9555
addnode=96.19.102.106
addnode=162.217.250.114
addnode=185.53.128.119
addnode=74.65.234.126
addnode=72.78.100.7
addnode=185.26.124.95
|
|
|
|
I hope you're aware that CCminer is GPL licenced, therefore any derivative work also has to. You violate it by closing your source code. Besides your NeoScrypt performance seems more or less the same to existing open source CCminers when it comes to GTX 1060/1070/1080. palgin is not worth bothering with; he's a knuckle-dragging primate (Russian, though apparently living in the Ukraine), or at least that's the way he responds in his miner thread. He's obviously using code from you, djm threefour & tpruvot — no compunctions, certainly regarding such a frivolous thing as GPL. Downloading and using his code might be more risky than Kaspersky AV. |
|
|
|
Do you even know what cuda_neoscrypt code do? Do your research and answer line-by-line, our freedom-fighter. I'll give you a clue, it LAUNCHES (!!!!!!!!!!!)
When person states something, he needs to answer.
...these questions three. Don't be a troll. Your attitude isn't very becoming of someone who really wants to support — and have people use — their "product", is it? cuda_neoscrypt.cu // originally from djm34 - github.com/djm34/ccminer-sp-neoscrypt
// kernel code from Nanashi Meiyo-Meijin 1.7.6-r10 (July 2016)
It's just an example. I guess you missed the point. But I'm sure you asked tpruvot, djm threefour, and/or Nanashi for a permissive re-license of their codes for proprietary/closed-source use. |
|
|
|
So, take me to court and prove it, man, take your destiny in your hands, become millionaire/billionaire/trillionaire (underline wanted).
First question, why do you need my source if it's not better than ccminer? What are you doing here? Oh, maybe you're GPL-police officer who decides who "no doubt" violates GPL, and who "doubtfully" violates GPL?
Second question, this one ritorical, what you consider GPL violation? For example, ccminer uses NVML wrapping, my miner uses NVML wrapping, all based on one library provided by Nvidia, code will be nearly exactly the same because it's lib provided by 3rd-party, is it GPL violation or not? If 1+1=2 why should I do 3-1=2? Or maybe you have inside info from planet Nibiru?
You obviously haven't read the GPL license in your own ccminer fork that you used to create "hsrminer": "When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs, and that you know you can do these things. To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others. For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether
gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same
freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive
or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights." Soooo many references to freedom that you probably don't understand it, living so close to the Kremlin in Moscow and all. I'm so sure you independently wrote your own neoscrypt algo cuda code, along with the rest of the mining program that isn't common "library" code. Whatevs. It's not about being the "GPL police". It does mean not claiming code you didn't write, trying to make a profit from it. It's not about rhetoric, either; it's a matter of respecting community property, not persuading everyone that you have a right to take and use what isn't yours to begin with. As far as the rest of your slights, I'll choose to ignore them since it's apparent to everyone that you have a different view of what comprises theft these days. And yes, I got that info directly from Nibiru.Good luck with the Cryptonite fork, btw. I'm sure you'll create another outstanding closed-source coin from it. Cheers, and Happy New Year, comrade. I really don't give a shit what you do with it, I ain't using it. |
|
|
|
Product contains devfee 1% (0.5% for me, 0.5% for alexkap) and is close-sourced, but voluntary work won't be abandoned.
Will be distributed (at least on the first stage) as one binary per algo, not so convenient, I understand, but currently it's code-bounded.
Cool work - however please consider this a formal request for the source - is seems the kernels might be related to another project of yours, https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer - which I'd also love the source for. Since the ccminer fork is entirely off a project released under GPL, all the code you've written is also considered GPL. I'm all for your devfee and am not looking to remove it, however I tend not to run anything I cannot compile myself and I tend to try and do my own optimizations for my linux rigs. Thanks - looking forward to the releases. I will second this motion; ccminer is GPL and you (palgin & alexkap) no doubt have code from ccminer embedded in your code, therefore violating GPL license agreements. Doesn't matter if it's 30% or 0.03%. I'm sorry about your financial situation (if true), but that doesn't allow you to do what you are doing here. Besides, your miner isn't any better than ccminer on neoscrypt, likely because of windows well-known DWM encumberances. Please release the open source, as is expected. |
|
|
|
Well. UFO hits 12 sat ($1.70 per thousand UFO), first time since last June when BTC was worth <$3K. Thanks devs! |
|
|
|
I cannot solo mine.
I rearrange the conf file and i got connected to the network.
But no hashes ... and if i mine in the pool, the funds don't raise.
What i can do ??
Thanks !!
Only this is appearing in the miner (ccminer neoscrypt win 1.5.80)
[2017-12-27 14:21:40] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 (mask 1)
[2017-12-27 14:22:42] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 592
[2017-12-27 14:22:47] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 595
[2017-12-27 14:22:52] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 592
Use NSGminer for now, it's better than an old CCminer. Well, except when it isn't. On linux with cuda8 at least, your own ccminer-neoscrypt 1.5.80 is still better than nsgminer 0.9.4 by 35% ( djm34 1.5.79 is best by ~50% over nsgminer). I even tested them with 1060 3GB cards too... Not picking a fight, man! Just pointing out some real-world numbers. I doubt the windows versions are significantly different, maybe a few percent here or there... |
|
|
|
Sorry — forced dev fees and no linux binary/source, winblows only? No thanks. |
|
|
|
1.3 gigs of disk space for 4 years of history isn't much actually. Ethereum gets over 200 gigs in just 2 years.
And Bitcoin weighs in at ~90GB last time I checked... |
|
|
|
try :
make -fPIC
Let me know
Results in make: PIC: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `PIC'. Stop.
That's a CCFLAGS or CPPFLAGS env var flag for the configure stage. Add -fPIC to those lines in the Makefile then run make. |
|
|
|
UFO CORE 0.9.0 of the UFO ROADMAP has been released!
Again, outstanding job by our dev bushstar.
Woohoo! Simultaneous Mac release! thankyouthankyouthankyouall |
|
|
|
atlas.phoenixcoin.org is stuck mining on block 1494351. The graph seems to show new blocks but 'recent blocks' is still showing 1494351 as the last, as well as the miner still working on that already found block. I really liked this P2Pool thing, payouts were finally in line with expectation, unlike most big pools.
That's just the website block listing, I don't think it has anything to do with the current block being mined. At one time several weeks ago, it was stuck on some block from three years ago, but the pool was still perfectly functional. They just fixed whatever was the problem, but perhaps it still gets "stuck" sometimes. Unfortunately I can't find any other pool but the blocks factory, who charge 5%! WTF? Anyone know of any other pools? I can solo mine in QT but I'm not synced yet, and it uses CPUMiner. Can I change the solo mining software and parameters in QT?
There's hexpool.com and altminer.net where you can mine directly for coins (both are still offline due to the yiimp hack), or the zpool multipool that has to go through a btc-pxc conversion on internal exchange (they're operational). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
