It may never happen in a large casino but looking at the current situation actually for some small casinos things like this can still happen and may even be commonplace to do.
I've found some similar conditions where there are some croupiers who even accept bets in the form of goods from the smallest such as watches or gadgets and there can even be bigger bets such as for motorbikes and even other guarantees.

We've even seen cases where a mother would use her child as collateral because she couldn't pay the losses she incurred from gambling.
This is proof that situations like this can still happen when gambling is too habitual for everyone.

Now it looks like for this transfer saga PSG will only remain passive where they will only improve the midfield and defense according to what they brought in this transfer for Joao Neves, William Pacho and Safonov but for the attack line they will still let the same players (minus Mbappe).
The Champions League target is still there, it's just that the target is increasingly not easy for them to realize especially with their strength which is definitely reduced due to Mbappe's absence which will have an impact on the attack scheme and formation later, so their probability has definitely decreased for now.
Since the beginning of the Champions League they have always been left behind, especially the Champions League benchmarks are still in Madrid and Manchester City and now it will make them even less in terms of probability considering that PSG in recent seasons has always been synonymous with Mbappe and Mbappe's absence in the squad next season, it is clear that it will reduce their probability greatly.

I don't think we can equate Barcelona's friendly against Madrid and the one against Monaco because the context of these two matches is different even though they are packaged like pre-season matches.
Against Madrid, the context was a friendly match where they tried to test all the players and that was proven by Flick playing almost all the core players and reserve players they had because this was a form of preparation for the upcoming season. In contrast to facing Monaco, although the concept is the same as a pre-season match, the context in this match is the struggle for the Joan Gamper trophy which they made themselves like a competition (because there is a trophy) and seeing from what they dropped in terms of the squad, most of the core players were actually because of the aim to win but they were ultimately slaughtered in the competition they made themselves.
This clearly distinguishes and becomes hard work for the preparation of the new season because when they face Monaco, it is clear that what they are looking for is a victory with the core squad but what happens is the opposite where they have to lose by a landslide score.

Toney is good enough for the attack and I think his performance was noticeable enough at Brentford to make it a possible purchase that could still be done.
But there are some issues that need to be considered in this case such as in financial issues that must be disturbed after Manchester United brought in several players where the expenditure they have made in this transfer is already more than 150 million.

 

https://www.transfermarkt.com/manchester-united/startseite/verein/985

If you add Ivan Toney, who is priced at more than 50 million, it will be difficult for Manchester United. But on the other hand according to Local Media that I read Manchester United tried to anticipate this by trying to borrow Ivan Toney with a permanent option at the end of the season.

But I agree with the assumption that winning is only possible in 1% and 99% is losing, why I agree with that is because it will make our psychology have no more hope of winning, so after placing a bet you know you will lose and even if you win you can assume that it's luck, most people always look at the chance 50% : 50% of winning and losing, even though it is true because only two choices you will get but it will encourage your psychology when losing to feel that you have the same chance of winning so you dare to bet an amount that you can't lose. IMO

Of course patience is the key to victory, only experienced traders can do this, because there are so many experiences about rushing, over-leveraging, fomo on the ups and downs so that placing short and long positions without clear arrangements in their trading activities become losses faster, yes that is me who has learned from a lot of impatience in the market.

Patience makes me prefer a calmer flow, leverage no more than 10x with adjusted risk if my position is liquidated.

Project owners can register their projects on coinmarketcap easily, as long as they meet the requirements given by the platform itself to developers who want to register their projects.
There are also many coins that are not on coinmarketcap but are on other platforms such as coingecko for example, you can search for it yourself.

Not necessarily the coin is listed unless the developer registers it there, while seeing the original or not you have to pay attention again, it could be a forgery, you can see the project description directly if it is available on a platform, and see the smart contract to verify that it is the correct coin or not.

Physical casinos should not accept any goods or property to be pledged by someone in order to finance gamblers to be able to bet, there must be restrictions on certain goods.

But on the other hand casinos may also want to take advantage when someone really wants to gamble and wants to pledge his property, of course that is a bad intention from the casino in my opinion.

In this case it is not only the casino that should be blamed but the gambler should also be blamed because he does not have money why should he gamble and risk his motorcycle just to be able to gamble.

When you have this thought, that is the problem why you increase the amount of your bet, your orientation towards money becomes you have greed and think you can get rich by gambling, of course it is a very fatal thought that you do.

Meanwhile in some cases from the confessions of other gambling players, when they first started playing gambling, they easily won at gambling and it seemed that the casino gave the winnings to the early gamblers to make gamblers interested in betting their money again, provoking the greedy souls of short thinkers, whether it is true or not I have also thought like that in your case, but so far I have played gambling, not so bad in money management then you will be much better at gambling if you control your money and yourself very well, luck is rare.

Of course even though we are optimistic about the bitcoin outlook in Q4 but we also have to understand because the name of disaster is not in anyone's calendar, something that cannot be predicted always comes and it is a mystery in a future journey, we must really understand the possibility of bad even though it is quite optimistic bullish in front of the eyes in order to manage the risks we can take at this time.

Yes you are not alone in such expectations, because if it affects the global economy it will be very painful for any market including bitcoin, hopefully it does not affect bitcoin at large, and the fear is just like a war like the wind.

I think it's more of a responsible gambler rather than a professional gambler, linguistically it doesn't fit the meaning of what is considered a professional which is an expert in a particular field.

Therefore there are no professional gamblers if based on those points, but maybe you have a different opinion about professional gamblers and it's valid if you think that way, but by the definition of professional itself then it is not worth saying as someone who is an expert in a particular field or called a professional.

This is actually a form of Chelsea's protection for Palmer because after all, with the current conditions and by looking at the performance that Palmer is their only successful purchase in recent seasons because his performance has always increased, it seems that the release date will be a little easier to break into other big clubs if they are interested in Palmer, especially since his value is also still quite cheap before when Chelsea managed to bring Palmer from Manchester City so they forced to renew the contract even though until now the contract still remains long enough just to increase the value of a Palmer.
Chelsea have the right to do that and we don't need to be disappointed even though their current actions are actually unnecessary but they already have a policy for that and they are free to do it.
It's just that with this, Todd must start thinking about his money from now on because if something like this continues to happen then sooner or later their finances will be in trouble later.

I agree because looking at what is in the current PSG squad with their strength in terms of financial and individual players actually for Ligue 1 they are still quite luxurious and will still be difficult to compete with even though there is no Mbappe for next season but some players still have skills above average so for Ligue 1 actually it is very enough.
But of course the hope is not limited to that, PSG is currently one of the clubs that is still considered big, especially with its financial strength so they definitely still want more in terms of recognition and the Champions League is one way for them to be recognized.
With their strength now although it is still very good but I am quite sure it will not be enough because apart from players and coaches, there is experience which is another factor if you really want them to be in better condition. By looking at that, of course there must be several players who must enter in the transfer season this time which unfortunately they still haven't done.

Camavinga's injury is thankfully not serious and according to local media I've read he will now undergo further checks on his recovery limit but he won't be available to play against Atalanta today.
But that won't discourage mentally because even though Camavinga is now injured but they still have plenty of options to make this match an advantage for them.
There is still Tchouameni who can be projected as a central midfielder and Jude or Modric who can be used as an attacking midfielder to complement Valverde later.
Camavinga's injury sounds a bit concerning but he won't be a problem even if he can't play today and hopefully the reports of his injury not being too severe are true.

I think this is a good condition for Manchester United because looking at the agreement they did for these two players of course this is a more reasonable deal than they forced to bring Jarrad Branthwaite from Everton.
In addition, when talking about the experience of being in a big club, de Ligt and Mazraoui are still very reliable in this regard even though de Ligt did not perform too well when he was at Bayern but when looking at what he showed at Juventus and in the Dutch national team he is actually still very worthy of big clubs, especially Manchesrter United. With this, the competition situation becomes more interesting for Manchester United's defense next season because in addition to the 2 new players who entered previously there is Yoro even though he is currently injured and of course several defenders who are already at Manchester United today.

In essence this becomes something very difficult, people are no longer talking about dogs, cats, monkeys, horses and others, this memecoin activity makes anxiety among the feasibility of real projects from the altcoin market, people buy it not because they like the image in the logo, but because they hope it is much better than shiba and doge coins that can make them rich many times over quickly, so people can gamble on coins, memes according to the narrative that has always been a favorite of many people.

There are too many meme coins in 100 cmc right now and it's bothering a lot of investors in a technology development. LOL

Pretty wise words.

Saying to be rich is much easier to practice it, I agree with that because being rich needs a long process, it can't be like today you work then tomorrow become a rich person, silly thinking isn't it, everyone wants to be rich but it's not an easy thing, especially in an economic situation that is on the verge of a recession like today, of course it will make it even more difficult in the future.

Building a business also takes time to get to a position that is far better, can increase and can become a business giant, more than a decade, without us knowing what the journey is like.

I totally agree that there is no need to be rich, but the need to be fulfilled in such a situation is something natural wealth that we can feel with our family.

Taxes applied to exchanges and gambling are certainly different things, because on the exchange there is a transaction tax for each trader, while in gambling or casinos there is no trading activity and the business that is run is only entertainment services, there are no value exchange transactions in casinos, gamblers are also taxed if they get a win like in other regions.

These two types of business are different, the services provided are also different, the exchange is like a market that provides goods, sellers and buyers.

It's very hard to describe a professional gambler in my opinion, and you're right about that, how is it possible to study gambling that relies so much on luck and find a way to get a strategy to get consistent winnings from gambling.

It can be a lot of work and a lot of money to get to that point, and I've never heard of a professional gambler except in movies. LOL

I'd rather focus on trading than focus on gambling for a living, although many people say it's similar but in the world of trading, you can get the right strategy in finding profits, and the skill factor can be decisive than the luck factor here.

This is in accordance with the theory that the environment will change your mindset and actions, basically it is very difficult for someone who is in a gambling environment not to gamble, various kinds of invitations must be there, as well as he works in the casino must understand the technicalities and games in the casino, it is common I have noticed from many gamblers who work in casinos.

Except if someone has good self-control despite working in a casino, but people like that are very rare.