Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 07:34:47 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
1  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 10 Billion bitcoin uncofirmed transaction on blockchain.info. EDIT: It's gone. on: March 13, 2014, 05:22:52 PM
the transaction is real, but nothing to worry about.

it is only Mark Karpeles cashing out.

2  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: New paper: Accelerating Bitcoin's Trasaction Processing on: December 08, 2013, 04:15:58 PM
If you are connected to 125 nodes, then for 200 TPS only the hashes already are 0.8 MBps:

125 * 32 * 200 = 800000 = 0.8 MBps

People often forget that.

Even if they can teleport the blocks and the transactions. The hashes alone are > 0.5 MBps.
3  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Blocks are [not] full. What's the plan? on: November 19, 2013, 07:05:31 PM
blocks are full NOW

there are already other threads about this

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=339257.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=338999.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=338793.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=338452.0

most pools create 250kb blocks only

please do something!!!

> release bitcoin 0.8.6, remove stupid -blockmaxsize
> transactions > 0.01 BTC are processed before transactions < 0.01 BTC
   tell people to not send transactions < 0.01 BTC, bitcoin is not ready for micro payments yet
> transactions not confirmed after 12 hours are removed from mempools automatically
> after 12 hours there must be a cancel/overwrite mechanism

at least tell people/merchants what to do if they have never confirming transactions

massive unconfirmed transactions are coming!!!

I know you devs are busy selling coins, but you owe the community solving this problem at least, before buying your ferrari.
4  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: FAQ on the payment protocol on: September 24, 2013, 06:58:57 PM
when you talk about private key, you mean ssl right? (not the bitcoin private key)
5  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Fattest 250 bitcoin addresses on: September 16, 2013, 08:13:41 PM

thx for doing some mental arithmetic Wink

but holy cow, thats 27% of all coins.
6  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Fattest 250 bitcoin addresses on: September 16, 2013, 05:41:06 PM
whats the sum?
7  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why did we raise the Blocksize limit? on: September 08, 2013, 09:31:42 AM
Thats not quite the revision where it changed. It changed in several steps, first the size of blocks it would create was limited,

this is the commit one should people point to, cause this is the first commit with MAX_BLOCK_SIZE introduced
8  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why did we raise the Blocksize limit? on: September 08, 2013, 08:25:35 AM
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/9d2174b6f5f3fac2463c7ebc2dbb9004b3740d23

this is version 0.3.1 rc1

you can find this line here
Code:
static const unsigned int MAX_BLOCK_SIZE = 1000000;

before it was
Code:
static const unsigned int MAX_SIZE = 0x02000000; 

if you convert 2000000 from hex to dec =  33,554,432 bytes = 32MB

also here:
"Because blocksize limit was lowered from 32 MB to 1 MB by Satoshi in early days of Bitcoin."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=251877.msg2679268#msg2679268
9  Other / Off-topic / Re: NSA bypass HTTPS and SSL on: September 06, 2013, 02:38:29 PM
this means that bitcoin will be dead by the end of the year. you should sell all coins now.
10  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: My idea: New blockchain for cheap & fast microtransactions in bitcoin, like a re on: September 06, 2013, 02:34:17 PM
the idea is stupid.

if your new chain could handle large amounts of microtransactions with 60 seconds, then bitcoin could as well
-> no need for a new chain in the first place.

or in other words, if your new chain is just a bitcoin clone, why would your new chain be able to handle
high transaction volume, but not bitcoin, if its just a clone.
11  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Reasons to keep 10 min target blocktime? on: July 22, 2013, 07:37:24 PM
Isnt the argumentation at least a little flawed?

Because shorter block times also mean shorter blocks.

Should make no difference, if you have for 10 minute block time, 1 time long validation time,
while for 1 minute blocks, 10 time short validation time. The sum is the same.
12  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin's Big Problem... on: July 22, 2013, 05:37:06 PM
Code:
Large Cap Company                       Ticker    Market Cap
                                                  ($in billions)
Apple Inc                               AAPL      439.39
Exxon Mobil Corp.                       XOM       403.32
Google Inc                              GOOG      257.40
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.                 BRK.A     243.60
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.                   WMT       238.85
General Electric Co                     GE        236.78
Microsoft Corporation                   MSFT      233.53
Chevron Corporation                     CVX       228.01
International Business Machines Corp.   IBM       226.03
Johnson & Johnson                       JNJ       210.06
Procter & Gamble Co.                    PG        207.55
AT&T Inc                                T         202.21
Pfizer Inc                              PFE       198.72
Wells Fargo & Co.                       WFC       186.93
JPMorgan Chase & Co.                    JPM       186.80
Coca-Cola Co (The)                      KO        168.46
Bitcoin                                 BTC            1

What are apple stocks useful for? What can you do with them, other then buy and sell.
Bitcoin is like the best stock ever:
- You can send/trade them with other people without a trusted third party involved.
- You can store them on a paper, usb-stick, computer, mobile, table, in your brain.
- You can easy launder bitcoins to make them fully anonymous
- You can actually directly buy stuff, though its not that wide-spreaded yet
- Like gold, its not bind to something. Stocks is always bind to the value of a company.
- You dont need a freaking bank or whatever company to buy bitcoin, you can buy them anonymously on the street
- etc
13  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Creating (and funding) SPV bitcoind on: July 17, 2013, 03:46:38 PM
Is this really such a good idea right now?

If everybody starts using spv, from where can you download the blocks, if nobody stores the blocks anymore?
I guess we should wait, until real block chain pruning is implemented, otherwise the amount of full nodes will go down,
which is no good right now. You could end up harming the network more than helping.
14  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How PayPal could leverage Bitcoin on: July 11, 2013, 12:24:16 PM
The best thing would be, if paypal introduces anonymous, non-chargeback accounts.

Everybody can create such accounts and fill them with up to 500$ per account with bitcoin.
Merchants could then decide to only accept "Paypal anon", to be on the safe side with no chargeback.
15  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] eMunie (EMU) - NOT a BitCoin fork/clone - call for beta testers on: July 05, 2013, 11:54:48 PM
What I do not understand, why are people blindly jumping on board, without even knowing what this is about and how it really works.

Another question: why do blocks have to be signed, if its proof of work? Are Hatches then trusted 3rd parties for the clients, because clients cannot
verify the work? Why do 2 hatches have to sign the block, this looks like a big security issue by design to me (or maybe I just misunderstand the hole thing).
16  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] eMunie (EMU) - NOT a BitCoin fork/clone - call for beta testers on: July 05, 2013, 08:26:15 PM
This is a total contradiction: You say you discourage hoarding, but give interest on .. hoarding???

If you give interest on a coin, the only thing people want to do with this coin is hoard.
17  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [XPM] [ANN] Primecoin Prerelease Announcement - Introducing Prime Proof-of-Work on: July 04, 2013, 05:48:56 PM
Why do you people waste your time with stuff like that?

If you spend all your time on improving bitcoin, that would really help.
What does a different proof of work change?
- it does not change that transactions have to be collected in a block
- it does not change that you have to wait for x confirmations
- it does not change that blocks have to broadcasted
- it does not change .. anything
18  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin and cryptocurrency usage stats... on: June 25, 2013, 02:37:32 PM
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/mtgox.com
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/bitcoin.org
http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Bitcoin
google trends, google keyword search statistics
19  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Bitcoin Foundation receives cease and desist order from California on: June 24, 2013, 10:02:45 PM
Interesting question would be:

Was it a misunderstanding on purpose? (of how bitcoin works)

If not, then everything is ok. Misunderstanding will be clearified and BF continues as normal.
If yes, then BF is screwed. They were just looking for a reason to shut this thing down.
20  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: why still so many blocks with 243kB? on: May 31, 2013, 03:30:37 PM
I think all pools just use what is given by upstream.

And my concern is that the default maximum block size given by upstream is 243kB.
There is no other way, why should every pool produce all the time exactly 243kB?
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!