I've just updated to the latest version (120061) and verified I'm on the correct chain. But when I try to do a "throne start", I get:
Not capable throne: Could not connect to 51.254.131.226:9340
I verified that I can actually telnet to this IP and port (besides I've not changed anything on the server except for updating the client). What is the issue here?
Hey domob - great to see you are setting up thrones, I am sure the guys here will try to figure out what the problem might be  Take care |
|
|
|
|
Trons getting back online slowly. Nice
|
|
|
|
OOoOoOoOoO Android wallets  http://prntscr.com/e6k8b7One of our community members has been working hard on an android wallet and making the final changes to get us added to coinomi  Looking forward to the Android wallet! |
|
|
|
I trust that you'll be fair with your estimates A few of the other team members and I also did the same and incurred some losses along the way, It was a big learning experience for the whole team, so we're trying to make sure that nobody got hurt too badly while we were learning. Like I said, I really can't estimate what was lost. The hashing, I don't really see as a major loss (although it would have been nice to keep all that crw that was building up from almost solo mining CRW Saw stonehedge on there and we were pretty much competing for hashing at the start, so I can verify that they most likely suffered large losses as I believe they were trying to support the proper chain) If need be, I can dig up the list of their tx's/txid's. (I'm not overly concerned about my losses on the mining aspect, just the users of mergemining.com). The thrones, well, lets just say thats up in the air. 4 of them I can bring back today, the other 10 are hosted, and it doesn't sound like they are coming back anytime soon, since it sounds like the entire setup needs to be cancelled and re-setup. If anything, I guess I'd like to see stonehedge compensated as he was a major contributer of hashing yesterday. I'll just suck up my losses. I chucked 0.5BTC into the rescue efforts yesterday. I'm asking for 0.25 BTC worth of CRW from the dev fund in lieu of this. Its up to the team, no love lost if not appropriate. Of course stone, the team will compensate you! thank you very much for your efforts and very fair approach to this! |
|
|
|
no, its merged in my own pool software, i can not switch to other pools on the fly  the explorers show an actual difference of 2154 CRW for these 8 hours plus additional time we need until the solution but because of the netsplit, etc.. it think 50% of this will be fine.. and i also don't want a "refund", just a bounty, so maybe 10% will be perfectly ok.. M8BWNNRFMNdak68c, Team will refund you for 3000 CRW, pls post your CRW address thanks for your patience! thank you. 17iZgAE3cSEYxynXa1g5GmbxFEj1HPpLDc Defunctec will refund you tonight, he is at work now. |
|
|
|
no, its merged in my own pool software, i can not switch to other pools on the fly the explorers show an actual difference of 2154 CRW for these 8 hours plus additional time we need until the solution but because of the netsplit, etc.. it think 50% of this will be fine.. and i also don't want a "refund", just a bounty, so maybe 10% will be perfectly ok.. M8BWNNRFMNdak68c, Team will refund you for 3000 CRW, pls post your CRW address thanks for your patience! |
|
|
|
no, its merged in my own pool software, i can not switch to other pools on the fly the explorers show an actual difference of 2154 CRW for these 8 hours plus additional time we need until the solution but because of the netsplit, etc.. it think 50% of this will be fine.. and i also don't want a "refund", just a bounty, so maybe 10% will be perfectly ok.. Send me an address to refund some of the CRW that was mined, and you should be able to connect and get back on the correct chain now. Both blockpioneers and chainz reporting the same block, with c-cex updated and infernopool mining. Working on getting xpool online. Again if you could set auxminingaddr=<MiningAddressHere> and provide that address for block statistics that would be greatly appreciated All lost funds will be compensated from our DEV fund. Please everyone send me a PM or paste it here. |
|
|
|
Both my test setup as well as mergemining are on proper fork (from the discussion here and verified by tx and txid to c-cex) .. Anything I can do to help smooth out this fork?
Yes you can help and everyone who is on the short chain, can you guys pls put more hash so we can surpass the 1.3th s which is being thrown currently on the long chain? That would be appreciated! There more like 905.6 TH/s on the long chain... that is a lot of miners. which is why, IMO, shouldn't it be the correct one? My pool has CRW off or it's be another 2-300TH.... crackfoo, would it be possible to direct the 2 x 300th to mergemining pool of sixoffive? We give you a bounty We know this pool got it right |
|
|
|
Before infernoman went to sleep he was very sure the short one is the correct one. Why dont those miners running on long, just stop until the short gets ahead? he is the guy who put the code together, so I tend to believe he is correct Be great if those miners who are not running on the short chain https://chainz.cryptoid.info/crw/#!extraction just stopped mining. I am offering a bounty for lost funds. |
|
|
|
Both my test setup as well as mergemining are on proper fork (from the discussion here and verified by tx and txid to c-cex) .. Anything I can do to help smooth out this fork?
Yes you can help and everyone who is on the short chain, can you guys pls put more hash so we can surpass the 1.3th s which is being thrown currently on the long chain? That would be appreciated! And those on long just stop for few hours! |
|
|
|
Did you notify syspool that a fork was about to happen? I got no notice of this. Is syspool even mining crowns asfaik its not even online
Can you please help us with that? It would be greatly appreciated. Seems they are not on Twitter. |
|
|
|
C-Cex is on the correct chain.
is there a deeper insight on this.. or just "we all do what the exchange does", because money ? i am really unsure.. please explain us, what happens.. sorry mate, our lead dev infernoman is resting after several days of working on this without sleeping. He will wake up soon and give you a technical explanation. I am a founder of Crown since 2013 and I am responsible of strategy together with my other colleagues. Its not about money, we just want to do this right! We will refund any potentially lost funds. |
|
|
|
so how do you define "right" and "wrong"? shuldn't the difficulty decide which chain is "worth more"? http://crw.blockpioneers.info/explorer.php - diff 12M - 84 Blocks longer - has new clients and old clients on it - 16 masternodes https://chainz.cryptoid.info/crw/ - diff 3 M - has new clients and old clients on it - 14 Masternodes? isn't the only difference that we put the hardfork some days earlier than planned? should we let the second one die? edit: okay i see the problem with c-cex.. they have the new version, but the short chain ^^ C-Cex is on the correct chain. |
|
|
|
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCMENT REGARDING RECENT UPDATEDue to a fault with enforcement, a fork has occured after the update. Please avoid spending or moving any coins at this time. Please ensure that your wallet is sychronised with the correct chain. To check, please compare with C-Cex or Chainz which are on the correct fork: https://c-cex.com/?p=crw-btchttps://chainz.cryptoid.info/crw/If you are on the incorrect fork, please add the following lines to your crown.conf and reindex the blockchain. This will help ensure you are on the correct fork. addnode=91.134.143.187 addnode=118.90.78.151 addnode=137.74.166.174 addnode=78.28.250.66 addnode=185.107.80.17 addnode=198.27.90.15 addnode=198.27.90.16 addnode=137.74.255.152 addnode=137.74.216.139 addnode=137.74.255.153 addnode=137.74.255.151 addnode=137.74.216.141 addnode=137.74.255.150 addnode=198.27.90.14 addnode=173.208.157.178 addnode=108.61.10.90 addnode=178.33.109.17 addnode=72.13.188.130 addnode=172.106.75.17 addnode=192.99.73.203 addnode=178.32.148.147 addnode=192.99.73.202 addnode=192.99.73.210 addnode=192.99.73.208 addnode=192.168.1.1 addnode=178.32.148.134 addnode=192.168.1.1 addnode=137.74.216.142 addnode=192.168.1.181 addnode=104.238.169.131 IF YOU ARE A MINER, PLEASE UPDATE AND ENSURE YOU ARE ON THE CORRECT CHAIN ASAP
The team are working across several time zones and doing everything to make sure this is resolved quickly. We promise to keep you informed as we learn more.
|
|
|
|
Throne monitor server will be updating today guys, so expect some interruptions in service. Everything should just smooth out when it's done though, so will keep you updated Great news, looking forward to that calnaughtonjnr |
|
|
|
|
No. of Trons under new client slowly going up
|
|
|
|
Bigmo thanks for your comments! 1. Trezor and slushpool - yes push them if you have the opportunity to help this Yes, there is definitely few areas how I can help. Lets dicuss this on slack. 2. Notary service - this feature is a very important one, I would like to see it running on Crown. Who will make it happen? I´m aware of it and thats way a pointed out this feature. Lets discuss on Slack 3. Logo - good idea, pls take it from here http://crown.tech/history scroll to the bottom, anything else you need? Ok, I will try to use the logo from there. 4. Thrones on a browser - we will discuss in the team, for me it is a good idea! Ok, cool. I think this definitely think to atleast considerable to think about:-) 5. SSL Certificate, this should not be a problem, the question is if this has real added value. Let me look into it. Well the biggest added values are as Stonehedge mentioned. You are building application platform with the highest level of security on the market so you should show to everyone that security is your top priority. Defunctec - no problem I´m happy to help where I can. Looking forward to be added on slack and discuss this is details. I´m syncing the QT now. The UI looks great and it is definitely good step forward from the bitcoin qt UI. Just 2 quick comments before I sync the wallet and will be able to test it. 1. In Transaction history tab when you want to sort trans. there is Darksent text left which remains the wallet has being cloned from Dash it is not a big issue not at all but good to think to update the text with some next wallet release. 2. Second think is the logo with the light blue color is hardly visible as a windows icon on taskbar. It is not a big issue again but people with worse vision could have problems:-)  3. Why does Windows QT client does not include Thrones tab which has being showed in the screenshots before? 1. Darksend, we will take it out 2. Good point, we will change the color of teh logo in the windows icon on taskbar 3. Infernoman took the Throne tab out, since the tab was not useful there. you set up thrones through a vps anyway. @infernoman? |
|
|
|
|
Just testing Mac, looks very good, syncing. We would really like to release this evening / Europe time.
We will update the Thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
