How can you say your coins have good value when there is no volume on the market? The initial price is not a benchmark as a good price. If the coin has not been in trading volume for a long time, it is certain that the coin project has stopped or abandoned by the developer so that the coin is not glimpsed by traders because it will only make it lose. Totally dead coin.

I think it is impossible to outperform Bitcoin even though giant companies will use stablecoin for their payments. Bitcoin itself is a pioneer in the world of crypto. The originality is no doubt and the value of bitcoin itself can only be judged by the users themselves. In addition, almost everyone uses bitcoin to make a profit, whereas at Stablecoin where it is possible to get profits at a stable price. That is the reason why Stablecoin cannot compete with Bitcoin because it is not very attractive, its use is only to stabilize assets, or only as a payment medium.

Although the price of gold is volatile, it is not as bad as crypto. The fact is the price of gold tends to be the same or greater than the previous price. In fact, giving a definite profit. You can see it here https://www.macrotrends.net/1333/historical-gold-prices-100-year-chart. Therefore I can say gold is more stable than crypto itself. In addition, the price does not go down from the purchase price if we save in a certain time.

I used to use Etherdelta or now it's changed to Forkdelta. But the last 2 years I use IDEX. I think this is my best version of DEX. With a good UI, its use is simple, and of course there is also a lot of trading volume. Although there is a minimum of sales and purchases but I think this makes IDEX a DEX that is not a shit exchange.

In this case, do you want the asset to be stable and have more selling value when later sold or just want to be stable?
If you only want your assets to be stable, I think USDT is better or gold. But if on the contrary, it's better you buy bitcoin and save it for a few years or to provide enough profit in your opinion.

Yes, it's possible. Personally, I no longer trust ICO or IEO and the reasons they make later. What I believe is coins that are already on the market, have high volumes, the technology can be used, and not fake teams. Everyone certainly has their own views. I do not blame or justify my personal statement. What is clear is that a bad experience happened to me when I joined ICO or IEO.

Most investors put their money in profitable projects quickly. I don't think this is a problem they don't believe in the technology but we don't know the back of it all. Maybe he is investing using money that he must later use for children's expenses, bills, taxes and others. So it would not hurt them to do that. And if indeed the predicted technology is proven to be good and useful, investors will also glance at it again. Both are no problem, just different needs and opportunities for each person.

I have become a bounty hunter since the bounty campaign exists. But since mid 2018, I quit for the reasons that the OP has mentioned. And I am now starting again with a campaign from Yobit which is directly paid by BTC. So I have no doubt how many results I will receive at the end because Yobit pays it instantly to my account. The last, I don't know who is the best of bounty manager. Since I come back, I just know Yahoo for the campaign I joined. That's it.

If you want to know a good new project, I do not know because most of them are all the same as a scam or a fall in prices when entering the exchange.
What I can recommend is the top 10 coins in Coinmarketcap. Certainly they are good coins that have high credibility. In addition, you also do not need to worry about the escape of developers, because they have run millions of dollars of projects so far and are still able to stand at the top.

ICO is dead. Although there is still some, there are only a few enthusiasts. Gradually it will also disappear. Even though there will be a very good project later, people's trust in ICO is already negative. Investors are very smart and careful about putting their money in. Better to buy coins that are already listed in a large market to avoid fraud or scams.

If I were you, I would buy 50% of the existing funds. I am not saying that the coins you chose were wrong, they are all good coins that have promising future potential. But it's not great if you don't have bitcoin in your investment. Hopefully what you choose can provide good benefits. Because if not, it's a pity the house you sell to buy these assets.

The main problem that hinders the adoption of crypto into society is the government. Because it is their policy that determines whether or not crypto can be used in their country. But it seems the community has begun to open up to the development of the times especially in the crypto world. Just give them profits so they will gradually accept the crypto itself because the reason can generate additional money.

I think GRAM will continue even though the SEC has not yet given its approval. Telegram itself for developers and bounty hunters is very useful as a medium for brainstorming & asking questions. Therefore, the development of the telegram is inseparable from the world of crypto itself today. The SEC should take care of the bulging developers rather than good projects like this.

The estimated time I said above is based on payment for the bounty hunter itself. If the bounty is running for a very long time, and payment via BTC or ETH, then certainly the developer spending will be much at all. Therefore I say 30-40 days is enough for the promotion period. This is also based on the fact that the average bounty hunter relies on money from crypto to fulfill their daily needs. So I think it's fair enough for them to receive salary after 30-40 days.

Perfect bounty campaign that has a reliable bounty manager. The point is that he can eradicate multiple accounts, fair stake, fast stake updates, and can analyze good bounty. Secondly, bounty participants should be paid with BTC or ETH. This is to reduce the risk of dumping when entering an exchange. Third, it doesn't take much time. Bounty is ideal if done for 30-40 days. That is all.

I don't really understand this ethereum 2.0 update, because I haven't had time to read it. But I am sure this will make the ethereum network better. It is well known that ETH has been going well so far. What I can do now is hold my coins for the future. Although many say the price of ethereum will decrease. I am sure that next year ETH will provide at least 50% profit.

Bad developers or CEOs are born from greed for money. They make projects full of sweet promises. And if indeed they are serious, surely the money flows by itself. Why should they resort to cheating that endangers themselves. This bad developer is what makes the world of crypto increasingly negative. Especially for ordinary people who just jumped into crypto. There really needs to be regulations for new developers who want to launch their coins. This is to avoid deception.

In the crypto world that is anonymous or not, scam acts often occur. The trigger is that they can have a lot of money easily. Create a new project, open ICO or IEO then spread the news to the forum. One thing that is certain is that a scammer will always be around as long as the crypto world is on. Either a scam project, or an individual scammer, or a runaway developer. To be sure, multiply your knowledge and expand research before plunging.

Libra means nothing. Lately, there has been a lot of bad news for Libra. As it is said, Amazon, PayPal, Etc. are out of libra. So we can be sure his presence will not produce anything. Especially if you want to rival bitcoin. Too far level. And it seems like there are also many people who don't like this project.

There were no interesting projects from one year ago. I think the choice you made to take a break from the crypto world is the right choice. You will not be affected by fake ICOs or fomo made by people. And I think you understand that. Just want to say welcome back to the jungle: D