Thank you for your reply. Is there any way to get around or avoid this restriction? It is highly annoying to have to wait 360 seconds between posts.

Yup, they are the same person, both bd69dc1c4c10c7258a11ec849c866ad09691b3b654f85b13c82b5284553bbcbd and 8e29686cd3930faaa1d3338f82e21d8cf15872503baecacff1f57a5063e6eac7 were signed with 1DKjtZJ4DJiXvkhv5iJHHS3XwTc4tBAvqa

Although to be fair, the loan that was defaulted on by BitcoinBoss666 was secured with collateral that was retained by the lender, so there was really no loss to the lender, and negative trust is probably not appropriate for BitcoinBoss666 (and as a result, would not be appropriate for BonusGame either).

On the other hand, I do believe that the OP is acting very suspicious, and should probably be watched fairly closely

When I registered my account, the page I was automatically directed to was the above page...as in I was directed to a page that contained all the threads that GermanGiant had created. I had initially thought this was some kind of list of threads that may be useful to read prior to browsing and posting on the forum. I was wrong.

---

On a related note, it might not be a bad idea to automatically direct newly registered users to a list of useful threads that may help them navigate both the forum and Bitcoin in general.  

Sometimes when I attempt to post I get this random and annoying error message saying that I posted in the last 360 seconds.

Why exactly am I receiving this message when I try to post? Other forums do not include this restriction!

Is there anyone in charge here that can stop this error message from happening in the future?

I am really not sure what this has to do with bitcoin

---

Generally speaking, prosper is a good platform to invest in if you want to invest in Peer-to-peer loans, primarily because they handle the collection of delinquent loans, and do a fairly good job in verifying the identity of borrowers.

Then contrasts to bitcoin related Peer-to-Peer lending sites like BTCJam, which force the individual lenders to pursue collections of loans, which makes collection much more difficult as collections is something that really needs an economy of scale to be done efficiently.

More likely then not, his account is worth no where near this amount. The OP is most likely either

• a) trying to scam someone by offering collateral that is worth significantly less then the amount of the loan (plus interest)
• b) trying to bait someone into calling him a scammer for asking for a loan with no collateral when in fact he is offering collateral

In all cases, the OP is not going to be a safe person to deal with.

This rule really does not make any sense.

---

It would more likely then not be a good idea to avoid accepting PayPal when dealing with PayPal for a number of reasons, a primary one being that you will risk that any PayPal payment received could get reversed, even if the person you are trading with is not acting in a malicious way.