 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
PLaCDZanMKjbzsNxBgx3pYehWEaBmA5ZnA
Thanks a bunch!
|
|
|
|
Hi Panoramix,
My offer is 1BTC for the lot. PM me if interested.
I'm actually after min. 100 credits for 2BTC.
Thanks,
QG
Sorry QuiveringGibbage, 1BTC is not enough. The offer still stands. 64 credits for 10BTC. |
|
|
|
Happy to see a Dutch initiative but before I send you any of my hard earned cash I need to see yubikey- and google authenticator support. Also, boasting that "Kosten noch moeite zijn gespaard om ervoor te zorgen dat uw Bitcoins veilig zijn" doesn't tell me much if you don't explain what exactly you do to keep our funds safe. Convince me.Otherwise it looks very promising. Keep up the good work. EDIT: Nevermind the remark about the security. Found the page: https://fbtcexchange.com/safe |
|
|
|
The network effect of transfers, and the trust aspects of it are actually pretty clever. It has potential.
But in being clever, they ruined everything that makes Bitcoin brilliant. Bitcoin is brilliant because it is the perfect game theory play. It motivates everyone to use it, intrinsically. Ripple motivates no one except OpenCoin.
I've been thinking for weeks about what was bugging me about ripple. You just said it. |
|
|
|
|
It was about time. First article in a Dutch newspaper as far as I know.
|
|
|
|
|
Your coins only exist in the blockchain (which is like a ledger). Your wallets (local and web) only hold the keys for for accessing/spending your coins. Your local client and web client are just two ways to look at the same blockchain. There can be a difference in the time that you see your transactions appear in your client due to sync settings of that client.
|
|
|
|
|
I just wonder what's in it for MtGox?
|
|
|
|
|
rsYmV8zjweYDacRsZdgtxFzsC1iNtYj78R
|
|
|
|
When I had more coins, my mentality was "I'd be fine selling XX% at $15.75" so that's what I'd post. It was always a tiered thing that practically guaranteed I'd make money.
Tell me more about that "tiered thing".. out of curiousity |
|
|
|
|
'we' are spending our BTC. For me, it goes a little like this:
I discovered bitcoin, got enthusiastic and bought myself relatively large amount of btc. Now, I have a percentage of my savings in btc that I feel comfortable with but I still buy for an x amount of fiat bitcoin every month. Most of that I spend, on anything and everything I can find that can be bought for btc. Most of the time I can't find enough useful stuff to spend my whole month's 'allowance' on, so what's left is my savings. The more I can find on the bitcoin market, the more I increase my monthly budget. So yeah, 78% doesn't surprise me. The more stuff the market has to offer, the more you'll see that percentage drop.
It all sounds too simple to even talk about. Isn't this the natural way people do things? in general.
|
|
|
|
Hi, has anyone tried to compile with success bitcoind for nas synology DS211j (arm)?
I'm going crazy!
I've been thinking about doing this as well. I'd be very interested in your experiences. |
|
|
|
Overall, he explained it well enough.
I can only hope that, one day, I will be able to explain it as well. |
|
|
|
Do you think today's sell off is being caused by GLBSE closing? Do you ever think we will get to the point where a record default won't cause a dip in price?
I don't see a "sell off". I see a healthy reaction on a (possible) disturbance in the Bitcoin eco-system. I would be stranger if the market didn't react at all. So, no, I don't think we will get to that point. |
|
|
|
Weird, just tried with an American proxy and firefox, and still get this error  . EDIT : Works with another proxy. Same here. Seems like this site has some issues with some proxies. Maybe a blacklist in action. |
|
|
|
I also believe there is a service somewhere which will monitor the value of an address.
I like http://btcbalance.net (not affiliated) to keep track of multiple read-only-addresses (up 'till 50, I believe), simple and easy to use. |
|
|
|
The're nice. I'd order a set as long as the price's reasonable. And I don't even play poker  |
|
|
|
|
