 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
|
|
Wir machen gerade eine kleine Internetseite.
Dort kann man sich als User mit seiner Emai-Adresse registrieren.
Nachdem man das Passwort per Email bekommen hat, kann man sich auf der Seite einloggen.
Man gibt dort den API Key und API Secret ein und aktiviert den automatischen Verkauf.
Ab sofort werden dann alle vorhandenen Währungen in kurzen Abständen in Bitcoins umgetauscht.
Wer Interesse an einem Test hat, kann hier im Forum die Test-Zugangsdaten haben.
Was haltet ihr davon?
|
|
|
|
Das ist keine direkte Mining frage also verschiebt mich bitte nicht ins Mining Forum. Danke
Hallo liebe Community!
Ich mine schon seit einiger Zeit mit 1xR9 280X+1xR9 290. Das bedeutet mein Mainboard+GPU+Netzteile funktionieren einwandfrei.
Jetzt habe ich mein Gehäuse endlich fertig gebaut, Powered-Riser und Grafikkarten rein (2x R9 280X + R9 290).
Alles lief Minuten lang sauber, bis ich das Rig neu gestartet habe, sobald cgminer startete und die GPU/Riser belastet wurden hat es angefangen zu stinken und rauchen. Ich habe natürlich sofort den Stecker gezogen.
Schaden: Riser am PCI-E Port durchgebrannt, kaputter Riser und Port
Meine erste Frage: Angenommen ich habe keinen Fehler gemacht (Dazu komme ich später noch) und es ein defekter Riser war. Glaubt ihr ich habe ein Recht auf Erstattung des Schadens(MB+Riser) von Verkäufer des Risers?
Beim gleichen Verkäufer habe ich schon 2 andere nicht Powered Riser gekauft, beide waren defekt, einer ist sofort durchgebrannt, hat aber keinen Schaden am MB angerichtet. Der andere hatte einen Kurzschluss sodass die Netzteilsicherung rein gesprungen ist.
Weil das MB ohne Probleme schon Tage lang ohne Riser lief kann ich mir nicht erklären was außer einem defekten Riser passiert sein könnte. (Wenn ich die powered Riser verwende darf, kann ich doch den zusätzlichen ATX 6 Pin anschluss am MB mit power versorgen, oder nicht? Kann das vielleicht ein Kurzschluss verursacht haben?)
Ich habe 2 Modulare 800-850 Watt Netzteile mit jeweils 65A 12V singlerail. Daran sollte es nicht liegen
Falls noch irgendwelche Fragen bestehen stellt sie bitte.
danke
Valansch
Du hast die Grafikkarten aber schon über die einen 6- und einen 8-poligen Stecker "von oben" mit Strom aus dem Netzteil versorgt, oder? |
|
|
|
All the things are working very good with no problems.
There is only one problem: It will take about 4 weeks. Then the energy costs will be higher than the earnings.
WTF? Lets do some math, maybe im just going nuts here. 150 watts for the ventilator XX Watts for the pump, you didnt write about that. around 110 watts per bitburner board, coming up to around 5300 watts This means, we are talking 5500 watts and a hashrate of 420gh/s. "calculating" My calc is that you need around 3900 kw/h per month. Basically, this equipment burns on the level of a normal family per month. How expensive is that? Well, in my country, I pay around 25 eurocents per kw/h. Coming up to 975€. That us quite expensive already. Your mining profits right now, per month, are around 3200 USD, around 2400€. Don't want to be annoying, but the difficulty would have to double again, to get you trouble. Not that it cannot happen, and it WILL likely happen, but how far do you think this is gonna go? At least you won't loose profits in the next four weeks I guess. You could even take doubling the diff right now to be profitable... If the difficulty rises 40% this time ( 5 days) and next time ( 5+ 10 = 15 days) then it´s 96% highter than today. In this case the 4 weeks are only 15 days.... And yes, if I could make the decision again to buy or not to buy the chips and bitburners months ago with the knowledge of today, I wouldn´t have them. |
|
|
|
There is something wrong with the math.
I am guessing that 5GH/s units are the 20 chips modules. If I convert 105 EURO's to CAD it's about $150 CAD. To get over 100GH/s I will need to spend $3000 CAD. Yet our friend YiFU sells the 4 module Avalon's for 12BTC which is $2400 CAD which I can easily get 100GH/s from.
Don´t forget the time in the math. The costs for 16 Bitburnerxx ( with together 320 chips) were ( long times ago) 320 chips 0,086 Bitcoins each : 27,52 Bitcoins 16 BitburnersXX 105 Euros each: 1680 Euros ( it that times about 16,8 Bitcoins) ATX PowerSupply, Raspberry Pi,.. 250 Euros ( 2,5 Bitcoins) 27,5+16,8+2,5 = 46,8 Bitcoins Today the AVALON 4-module miner with 320 chips costs 8 Bitcoins So today it is better to buy a miner with 320 chips for 8 Bitcoins then for 47 Bitcoins .... |
|
|
|
455MHz @ 32C?  Are you running them in your fridge??? Anyway I'll try with my air cooled bitburners and "--avalon-auto". Let's see what happens... For me "--avalon-auto" results in slower hashrates - after about 10h it went down to ~320MHz (starting at 380MHz). I'll try again with v3.4.3, maybe this will result in better rates... I would really like to see pictures of solaris setup, must look awesome.
+1 sorry for the delay. I had problems with my PC. At the moment it´s cold outside ( 4°C) and I set the voltage to 1300 mV.  I´m using an old cooler from a car. It needs 150 W for the ventilation.  And this is the water pump. max 2200 l/h  And this are my 48 bitburnerXX:    All the things are working very good with no problems. There is only one problem: It will take about 4 weeks. Then the energy costs will be higher than the earnings. |
|
|
|
My bitburners are running fine with cgminer --avalon-options 115:32:10:35:380 --avalon-auto --queue 4 --bitburner-voltage 1285  I run them with 1170mV at 380 just fine. Yes, but with the --avalon-auto they are running up to 455 ( BTB 0 = 453; BTB 1 = 455; BTB 2 =451 ) with this setting. If the voltage is below 1285, they don´t reach the 450. |
|
|
|
My bitburners are running fine with cgminer --avalon-options 115:32:10:35:380 --avalon-auto --queue 4 --bitburner-voltage 1285 |
|
|
|
after 20 minutes:
[2013-10-22 19:42:46] usb_write error on avalon_write
[2013-10-22 19:42:46] usb_write error on avalon_write
[2013-10-22 19:42:46] usb_write error on avalon_write
[2013-10-22 19:42:46] usb_write error on avalon_write
[2013-10-22 19:42:46] usb_write error on avalon_write
after cgminer restart:
2013-10-22 19:44:29] avalon detect (1:23) failed to initialise (incorrect device?)
it could be broken usb hub.....
invastigating now
my line:
--bitburner-voltage 1300 --avalon-options 115200:12:10:28:420 --queue 3 -G --avalon-fan 80
I had a lot of problems at the beginning. Some bitburners stopped working. After reboot they worked for a few minutes, then other stopped. I tried different settings. But the the system did not work stable. Then I used this: http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B000KY7VY4/ref=oh_details_o02_s00_i00?ie=UTF8&psc=1.. and all the problems are gone.. Now the system with raspi and 48 bitburners is running for days without problems. ( using --avalon-auto) |
|
|
|
Im a bit puzzled now. I host some miners for another user. 3 bbxx + 1 bbx in one stack. It runs at 26.5GH/s, thats 7.57GH/s for one bbxx. Not much. I previously had 5 miners and they ran at 43.75GH/s, which is 8.75GH/s per bbxx.
Now i got 10 more miners that run in another stack. Its 10 bbxx. And they only run at 64GH/s. Thats 6.4GH/s per bbxx only.
I dont know whats wrong. All run in one cgminer-instance, so two miners are recognized. All miner are blinking with all colors.
I ran my old 5 bbxx, that i dont have anymore, at the following settings:
--avalon-options 115200:10:10:28:450 --bitburner-voltage 1334 --avalon-temp 30 --queue 6
I ran the 3.5 bb at
--avalon-options 115200:8:10:28:450 --bitburner-voltage 1334 --avalon-temp 30 --queue 6
and the 13.5 now at
--avalon-options 115200:28:10:28:450 --bitburner-voltage 1334 --avalon-temp 30 --queue 6
I found that the second value in options should not be too low, but it doesnt matter if its too high. Since i dont know exactly how to setup for 2 stacking towers i simply used 28.
But i dont really get whats the problem. Why should my old miners run faster and the newer ones slower? queue 10 didnt change anything too. HW is under 1%.
7.5 miners are powered with a psu from burnin, the other 6 with an Seasonic Platinum SS-1000XP. The workload of the raspi is at 7%. Could it be differences in pools used? I used bitparking.com with my own miners and now bitminter.com is used. All boards are on firmware 1.0.2.
Do i really have to start testing and tweaking everything from the start because every setup needs its own settings? I mean it cant be normal that 10 miners only bring 73% of the hashrate of 5 miners got before.
cgminer didnt change in an unfortunate way right? 1334mV and 450MHz i used before can be used now too. In older cgminer-versions i had to manually edit cgminer sourcecode.
Someone knows?
Why don´t you use the --avalon-auto ? So you don´t have to look the whole day at your bitburners. cgminer runs every cluster at the optimum. |
|
|
|
Does anyone know what it means when cgminer says this at start: I don't have the CAN-BUS cable so just have a BitBurner X and a BitBurner XX each on separate USB cables. I'm using these cgminer settings: --avalon-options 115200:2:10:28:450 --bitburner-voltage 1334 --avalon-temp 30 --queue 4 -G Does that look right for my setup? I seem to be getting pretty good rates. Maybe the settings are too fast and too cold. I´m running my Bitburners with this: --avalon-options 115200: 32:10:35:380 --avalon-auto --queue 4 --bitburner-voltage 1285 With this settings the bitburners are running with 435 to 446 MHz, depending to the temperature. ( At the moment 445 MHz, 45°C) They are running fine with a raspberry pi. I used this tutorial: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=233392.0Look at burnins site: https://www.burninmining.com/news/You can find this: The next value is the number of miners, this must be the number of boards in cluster multiplied by 2So if you have 2 bitburners, you have to choose the number 4: --avalon-options 115200: 4:10:35:380 --avalon-auto --queue 4 --bitburner-voltage 1285 |
|
|
|
Does anyone know what it means when cgminer says this at start: I don't have the CAN-BUS cable so just have a BitBurner X and a BitBurner XX each on separate USB cables. I'm using these cgminer settings: --avalon-options 115200:2:10:28:450 --bitburner-voltage 1334 --avalon-temp 30 --queue 4 -G Does that look right for my setup? I seem to be getting pretty good rates. Maybe the settings are too fast and too cold. I´m running my Bitburners with this: --avalon-options 115200:32:10:35:380 --avalon-auto --queue 4 --bitburner-voltage 1285 With this settings the bitburners are running with 435 to 446 MHz, depending to the temperature. ( At the moment 445 MHz, 45°C) They are running fine with a raspberry pi. I used this tutorial: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=233392.0 |
|
|
|
Kanns nicht genau sagen, aber ich denke es ist realtiv neu ^^ Sie hängen aufjedenfall weiter zurück, als ich gedacht hätte... =/ Da steht dran: posted this on May 31. Also ist die Info schon ein halbes Jahr alt. |
|
|
|
I got my bitburners xx order #42x today.
One bitburner works fine with the usb.
The second is working fine with the usb but not with the CAN-bus. Weeks ago I read about this problem in the forum but now I could not find it.
Could anybody help me?
Did you put jumpers on the boards? See: http://www.burninmining.com/news/Thanks a lot. That was the problem. I searched in this forum and didn´t find the answer. |
|
|
|
|
I got my bitburners xx order #42x today.
One bitburner works fine with the usb.
The second is working fine with the usb but not with the CAN-bus. Weeks ago I read about this problem in the forum but now I could not find it.
Could anybody help me?
|
|
|
|
Only COM19 was found.
But it don´t start.
It is no problem to start mining with the CPU.
What happens if you try to start it? Anything in the log then? No. Nothing in the log. |
|
|
|
Yes.
But sometimes I have to restart my PC. And than it takes up to 10 times to get them running.
I can see each Single 60GH/s at BitMinterClient. But some of them don´t show the temperature and don´t start.
What messages do you see in the log? 2013.09.28 [13:08] BitMinter Client v1.4.1 started 2013.09.28 [13:08] Hint: Use performance mode for best GPU results (bottom right button) 2013.09.28 [13:08] Found 1 OpenCL-compatible GPU 2013.09.28 [13:08] Probing all ports for external devices 2013.09.28 [13:08] Probe of port COM2 failed: timeout 2013.09.28 [13:08] Probe of port COM1 failed: timeout 2013.09.28 [13:08] Device detected on COM19: BitFORCE SC 1.0 2013.09.28 [13:08] Difficulty is now 148819200 The 4 BFL SINGLE 60MH/s are on COM19, COM20, COM21, COM22 Only COM19 was found. But it don´t start. It is no problem to start mining with the CPU. When I restart my computer then: - maybe all of the 4 Singles are found, may be only a few ( let the devices connected ) - it is no problem if I do like this: start BitMinter, wait, connect the first BLF Single, wait, connect the second Single, wait .... |
|
|
|
J have 4 BFL SINGLE 60 GHs each on one PC.
Windows 7, Java 7.40, new drivers, Bitminter 1.4.1
Bitminter shows all of the singles.
But sometimes, one or two don´t start. Sometimes they do.
I don´t knwo what to do.
Surely you'd want to leave them running all the time instead of turning them on and off? Yes. But sometimes I have to restart my PC. And than it takes up to 10 times to get them running. I can see each Single 60GH/s at BitMinterClient. But some of them don´t show the temperature and don´t start. |
|
|
|
|
J have 4 BFL SINGLE 60 GHs each on one PC.
Windows 7, Java 7.40, new drivers, Bitminter 1.4.1
Bitminter shows all of the singles.
But sometimes, one or two don´t start. Sometimes they do.
I don´t knwo what to do.
|
|
|
|
|
refunding....
Don´t forget, you ordered a special product, only produced for you with your chips.
Burnin odered and payed all the things needed for the production, developed the board, worked hard day and night for months.
And now, you didn´t deliver the chips to him in time.
Why should he give you any refund? You did´t fullfill the contract.
Think about this.
|
|
|
|
|
