|
Hate these politics guys.
You want companies to stop using tax loopholes? --> CHANGE THE FUCKING LAW.
Otherwise? --> STFU.
|
|
|
|
Second bubble splat incoming...  |
|
|
|
|
This $14 is not big it is huge. Like fucking cliff.
I guess it is some king of test; if this $14 is gonna be eaten, then Bitcoin is really going to skyrocket soon.
|
|
|
|
|
I got some news for you, the big-dump is not gonna happen. If you sell it's for good.
|
|
|
|
See? That's what I said. Now let's go for $14! $15 $15.50 and crash!!111
FTFY FTFY |
|
|
|
|
Cmon, the person that bought 5k BTC to arrive at $13.00 be nice and buy the rest of this wall.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, can someone explain what is the point of Devcoin since we already have Bitcoin?
|
|
|
|
Stratum in production will go on port 3333 with 5050 as an option if 3333 is a problem for you.
I donated 1 BTC to 15SSRJdHfhjcRU7woXR9sYKPUXNS4ScaaB. Thank you Doc! |
|
|
|
As far as I'm concerned; until complex transactions are available, Bitcoin adoption is in the puppy love stage.
care to explain what are these? |
|
|
|
 Your image is wrong OP. This is the true cycle of any new technology. Edit: We are between stage 4 and 3. |
|
|
|
Sure, I'll add one of those ports. What's special about them anyway? Mining behind a firewall is no joke, I did originally choose Bitminter because you were offering port 80 mining. These ports are the only ones I can reach. |
|
|
|
|
Where does the name 'cgminer' come from? Are you French ckolivas?
|
|
|
|
Ya my first several shares are usually rejects. I am mining over wifi, with about a dozen+ other computers on the network, so DCs are a fact of life. Still, I can live with 0.3% for now. Don't go further. This is the issue. I'm not complaining. I know it's a problem, but one I sorta have to live with.  ... only until the current stratum problem is resolved and we move on to 'discussing' the reconnect issue and fixing that  I've read a certain number of posts from Kano speaking of these problems with Stratum now. If I believe Kano, it looks like the solution are somewhat trivial to implement, by just modifying the specifications we would be good to go. In 2 months from now on, Stratum will be the de facto standard protocol (because GBT has too much stales), now is a good time to correct forgotten cases/issues by Slush, not in 2 months.  |
|
|
|
That sounds really dumb.  You haven't read many of hahahafr's posts, have you? I love you too.
According to a BFL representative, the reason why they were late was exactly because of those changes to their specs. So no, not as crazy as it sounds.
Didn't BFL say at the time that they'd originally intended to release a post-delivery firmware update which would have taken the specs to 60 GH/s? That was the original implication. Later followed by apparent hardware level changes to support the increased speed. Hence, the extra delays. BFL might have originally shipped at their original spec much sooner. Though that train of logic is broken (or borked) by the problem they appear to still face: namely, sourcing components. They appear to be suffering from a component shortage or late delivery of components [other than the ASICs[. Actually the latest news is that the ASICs were borked, and that's the delay. Though that is still a component shortage I suppose. Can you elaborate on this borked thing? |
|
|
|
|
bASIC went from 27 GH/s to 54 GH/s, to now 72 GH/S for $1069.99.
BFL from 40 GH/s to 60 GH/s for $1299.99.
Is Tom using all of his ressources to force BFL to adapt to these numbers, thus delaying BFL shipment plan? Maybe because he has not his bASIC chips himself?
I would do the same in his position.
|
|
|
|
Yep I'm on CGMiner 2.9.5, with stratum on Ozcoin. I set the diff to 2 with 1.5GH/s, and today I'm just under 0.3% rejects, which is actually pretty high. I'm usually around 0.1-0.2%.  Those rejects are 99% likely to be either during connect while the difficulty corrects itself (directly related to the problem being discussed) or due to reconnects (i.e. if you lose pool connection) The fix for the 2nd one (reconnects) is simply an enhancement ... that no doubt there will be few arguments about (when it gets in vogue ) since it is just an enhancement - no compatibility issue with the current implementation. Ya my first several shares are usually rejects. I am mining over wifi, with about a dozen+ other computers on the network, so DCs are a fact of life. Still, I can live with 0.3% for now. Don't go further. This is the issue. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
