dooglus you should stop wasting time here. OP will just respond to your bug reports with "I will not play your troll games." again and again.
Maybe his developer will see my bug reports and fix the bugs, idk. Here's a series of screenshots from a 15 second game. I had a clock running in the corner to make the timing clear: 18:23:13 - nobody played yet 18:23:15 - the first ticket is bought 18:23:18 - same guy buys another ticket 18:23:19 - someone else joins in 18:23:29 - ten seconds later and nothing has changed 18:23:30 - the game ends, just 15 seconds after the first ticket was sold I will not play your troll games.
|
|
|
I just watched a game where the "lukcy" winner wasn't even one of the two people who were playing: https://i.imgur.com/TeICAmx.pngI guess you have bigger problems than provable fairness. Nice try to make a fake screen shot, i will not play your troll games. Try watching your own site for more than 5 minutes. It happens pretty regularly. This one was interesting - the game ran when there was only one participant. At least he won, I guess: Neither screenshot is fake. Both these things really happened. Your inability to accept feedback and react to it is appalling. I'm not even asking for bug bounties. This is all free! (You're welcome ) I will not play your troll games.
|
|
|
I just watched a game where the "lukcy" winner wasn't even one of the two people who were playing: I guess you have bigger problems than provable fairness. Nice try to make a fake screen shot, i will not play your troll games. Try watching your own site for more than 5 minutes. It happens pretty regularly. This one was interesting - the game ran when there was only one participant. At least he won, I guess: Neither screenshot is fake. Both these things really happened. Your inability to accept feedback and react to it is appalling. I'm not even asking for bug bounties. This is all free! (You're welcome ) I'm not playing your troll games.
|
|
|
I just watched a game where the "lukcy" winner wasn't even one of the two people who were playing: I guess you have bigger problems than provable fairness. Nice try to make a fake screen shot, i will not play your troll games.
|
|
|
I have explained over and over to you why you are wrong, i'm not playing your little troll games anymore.
No, you haven't. Look at your 7 falses, and see if you can justify them. You asked me to prove your site wasn't provably fair. I broke it down into 7 steps so you could understand. You just wrote "false" next to each of them, when I'm sure even you could understand at least some of them if you tried your hardest. You're clearly trolling, not me. I have explained over and over to you why you are wrong, i'm not playing your little troll games anymore.
|
|
|
I believe the inconsistency in the timestamp is only a mistake. I agree with twitchyseal to Dooglus is just trying to bully the guide who is a competitor of him also a newbie which is quite unfair. The raffle idea is brilliant and we should encourage him to improve and make it better instead of attacking him like that
I am encouraging him to make it better, but he refuses to understand what is wrong with it. His site has approximately zero volume. It isn't in competition with Just-Dice at all. I have no problem with competition. My problem is with deception. OP is lying about his site being provably fair. If he thinks he's able to get away with that without me pointing it out, he's mistaken. I have explained over and over to you why you are wrong, i'm not playing your little troll games anymore.
|
|
|
All payments have been sent out.
@retes12345 it looks like 2 of your images do not show you sending a message at the correct time.
|
|
|
I first want to say i am very impressed on how much time you just spent attempting to make our undeniable provable fair system look any different than it is. You are a highly skilled troll but the end of the day you are still just a troll. People can see you are 100% lying. Lets take this last games hash Mon Jan 04 2016 12:09:55 GMT-0800 has won with 0.00080000 btc, had a winning chance of 88.89% and made 0.00009899 btc of profit. LUCKY NUMBER: 1747 HASH: 1cdcc435be42f8c1819d0ad344d79453770c68f7aab53f3fa8d1de2e63635022 TOTAL POT: 90000 satoshi now lets take that hash over to blockchain Do you see this? https://blockchain.info/tx/1cdcc435be42f8c1819d0ad344d79453770c68f7aab53f3fa8d1de2e63635022Can you see the time stamp? 2016-01-04 12:09:53 Can you see the time stamp of the game? Mon Jan 04 2016 12:09:55 GMT-0800 Now do you understand how the provably fair works? Or are you going to continue to troll? Dooglus is obviously just jealous of OPs success and wishes he thought of the raffle idea first so he wouldnt be stuck with a silly clam dice site. OP you should challenge all these idiots to some sort of coding/what is provably fair battle , winner gets the others site. All you need is a judge /escrow and a challenge. Yeah its clear they are just here to blow smoke in a attempt to make us look bad, i'm done playing their little troll games.
|
|
|
I first want to say i am very impressed on how much time you just spent attempting to make our undeniable provable fair system look any different than it is. You are a highly skilled troll but the end of the day you are still just a troll. People can see you are 100% lying. Lets take this last games hash Mon Jan 04 2016 12:09:55 GMT-0800 has won with 0.00080000 btc, had a winning chance of 88.89% and made 0.00009899 btc of profit. LUCKY NUMBER: 1747 HASH: 1cdcc435be42f8c1819d0ad344d79453770c68f7aab53f3fa8d1de2e63635022 TOTAL POT: 90000 satoshi now lets take that hash over to blockchain Do you see this? https://blockchain.info/tx/1cdcc435be42f8c1819d0ad344d79453770c68f7aab53f3fa8d1de2e63635022Can you see the time stamp? 2016-01-04 12:09:53 Can you see the time stamp of the game? Mon Jan 04 2016 12:09:55 GMT-0800 Now do you understand how the provably fair works? Or are you going to continue to troll?
|
|
|
Done Veves1 1BYQupWfS8e8bEiAAy5oMPDJziYvyCBGbN Please review how this works, you have to be the first person to message after a admin post "next person to message wins"
|
|
|
We would like to do a new type of contest we are calling "The chat box giveaway" How This Works:We have 5 Site owners each one will be randomly be giving away free BTC via our chat box on http://btc-raffle.comTo enter just be the person who is the first to comment after one of the admins says "next to message wins" If you are the first person to message after the admin you will win a random prize from $0.04 Up to $1.00 You will also get X2 you winnings if you are the most recent winner. We also have a chat bot that will be doing giveaways every 30-60 mins even when our admins are a sleep. To prove you are the correct member you must comment. Bitcointalk Username: Deposit Address: Then screen shot it upload to http://imgur.com/ Then post it on this thread to be rewarded.
|
|
|
1) you can generate transactions without broadcasting them Answer False 2) you can check the txid of those transactions before you broadcast them Answer False 3) once you know the number of satoshis bet, you can figure out which ticket would win for each transaction Answer False 4) so you can find out which of your 100 pregenerated transactions would make you win if it was picked Answer False 5) it takes less than a second to get a transaction picked up by blockchain.info Answer False 6) you have no way of proving which was the last transaction you saw on blockchain.info after the 30 seconds is up Answer False 7) you can pick any transaction that was shown on blockchain.info in the relevant second Answer False
Now let me try once again to explain in layman's terms for you, we cannot predict when the last second will be, as when each person joins the game it resets back to 10 seconds.
Only with magic can we be so lucky to have the site use said transaction.
This also is all happening within seconds do you think we are super computers who can take the amount of satoshis know exactly when the game is going to end compute all that with in seconds oh and get super lucky with magic and get our transaction on the exact second the game ends?
You sir are a bad troll.
|
|
|
You are just straight out lying now, you are claiming we can use pre-generated hashes. This is 100% FALSE
Care to explain why you couldn't use pre-generated hashes? You would just need to broadcast them shortly before the 30 second timeout. We have tried to explain to you many times how our system works, but it seems like you are incompetent of understanding it.
I understand it just fine. It isn't provably fair. We would first have to pay the 0.001 fee from blockchain then we would also need know the second it would be on blockchain. As you can see this is impossible. Please post it public how the system is not provably fair, because just saying it means nothing. If you can show us any real proof i will gladly say your right, besides that you just sound like a troll. Clearly with the motivation to make us look bad and to make our competitor look good.
|
|
|
|