This does sound like a virtual memory problem.

It's a simple enough procedure, but if you need help configuring your VM in Windows, I recently updated my guide here: https://www.cryptoyeti.com/cannot-write-buffer-for-dag-error/

I picked $20-$50 as that seems the most likely, but I do have to ask, what happened to the other price brackets? The $5 - $20 range is missing as well as the $50-$200 range. Those are fairly large spans that could be very viable targets as well.

As illogical as this may seem, especially since The DAO has a 28 day buying window and the first 14 of those will be at the cheapest price (meaning the last days are most expensive), I expect you will be proven right as people will just have to get in before its too late.

As simplistic as your answer may seem, it could simply be this in the end, greed. Knowing ahead of time this would cause the price of BTC to fall, and also knowing ahead of time exactly when the blog post and corresponding media releases would be published, one could make an argument that people in the know could take advantage of an excellent shorting opportunity. Though I think they may have expected the price to fall further than the $20 or so dollars it did, if you had access to enough capital and shorted several thousand BTC expecting even a $50 decline you would stand to make a nice profit. Crazy theory, but no more so than everything else we have seen today.

You mean better public proof other than the now debunked proof he has already provided? Ask yourself if this was truly Satoshi Nakamoto, the man credited with the creation of Bitcoin, why would he offer up proof that he knew would be debunked in a matter of hours, if not minutes, after if was published in the first place?

There is no way this is Satoshi, it is simply Craig's feeble attempt number 2 at fooling the gullible. Perhaps he will get it right the next time, after all "the third time's the charm."

I believe you all are under the mistaken belief that it was the woman that was invited to be on the panel. Where you went wrong in your logic is that is was actually her Shoes that were asked to be on the panel. The woman, was simply there to facilitate getting the Shoes there in a timely manner.

Also, you will notice there is a typo on the screen, it should have said Elizabeth Rossiello's Shoes.

Yes, this would be good information to know, are the values used in the poll for DAO tokens, ETH, USD or what? Seeing the DAO has produced close to 140 million DAO tokens thus far, I would guess you are measuring in DAO tokens but clarification is appreciated.

It is more than a simple spelling mistake. Since he also showed this same mistake in one of the scripts that is visible on his blog post, he could have easily used this "mistake" to trick someone by loading data from another file that the misspelled "signiture" variable was pointing to while the observer assumed that the data was from the variable "signature", which also appears in the same script correctly spelled. They would be two different variable to the computer, but would be something a casual glance through the code to an observer exciting he is meeting the real Satoshi might miss.

I am also casting my lot as doubting the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto as being that of Dr. Craig Wright.

http://cryptoyeti.com/who-is-satoshi-nakamoto/

New article up on the Satoshi Nakamoto speculation making the rounds: http://cryptoyeti.com/who-is-satoshi-nakamoto/

Not saying you are wrong in doing so, but just an observation.

If there is enough interest to push it back to $20 in such a short amount of time I don't see why you would be so eager to get out, as it clearly has the resilience to bounce back. This coupled with the DAO offering should keep pressure on the price. I wonder how many people in BTC's early days had the same sentiment, if it hits $20 I am cashing everything I have out...

Evidence is certainly piling up that Craig Wright is not Satoshi. http://cryptoyeti.com/who-is-satoshi-nakamoto/

I have a new article up explaining how to purchase DAO tokens using the Mist wallet, as well as how to set up and monitor the DAO contract and your personal DAO tokens from within Mist.

http://cryptoyeti.com/purchasing-dao-tokens-through-mist/

New article up on purchasing DAO tokens through the Mist wallet, as well as setting up and monitoring the DAO contract and your personal DAO tokens.

http://cryptoyeti.com/purchasing-dao-tokens-through-mist/

Another small bump. Smiley

Added some new content since the last posting.

I still welcome feedback, comments, criticisms, as well as suggestions for other coins and topics of interest.

Thanks!

http://Cryptoyeti.com

First off, thank you for taking a look at the site and also taking the time to reply here.

Yes, I have a few dedicated mining guides as well as several tips and tricks in some of the Video Card reviews I have been putting up.

A couple specific ones include:

http://cryptoyeti.com/2016/02/14/how-to-mine-ethereum-on-your-pc/  for mining on a Windows PC

and

http://cryptoyeti.com/2016/03/24/ethereum-mining-gpu-cant-allocate-the-dag-in-a-single-chunk/ addressing the recent 2 GB issue with the DAG file.

Hopefully, I can get some feedback as right now I am writing these guides and they make sense to me, but I do not know what questions are still to be answered. I am looking to continue to write and improve any guides that need additional information.

Small bump.

Added a lot of content since the last posting.

It might seem mainly Ethereum focused for now, since that is the hot topic and profitable to mine, but I welcome suggestions for other coins and topics of interest.

http://Cryptoyeti.com

I am bullish on Eth long-term, but yes, if this does dump some more expect it to correct to about 50% of its high, which would mean buying back in at 0.015-0.016 range.

At a minimum I would think it may drop below 0.20 which would be a good time to buy back in. This would mirror the similar "correction" that occurred in February when it went from 0.017 down to 0.008 before recovering.

It seems these cycles take a few weeks to play out completely, so it may take a few more days to a week to find the real bottom.

I think you are think of Craig Wright, and he was wanted on tax "issues" long before that wired article broke. I suppose that story release may have helped move the raid up as once he was in the spotlight he might have tried to run or something, but Bitcoin was not the sole source of his trouble with the law..

I do not understand why you think 4 cents is too much? Are you trying to send 10 cents transactions around or something?

Any other form of transmitting money will cost way more than 4 cents per transaction. As far as the incentive, yes it is currently 25 BTC per block, soon to be 12.5 BTC around June 2016. At some far off date (2140 I believe) this will be reduced to 0 and the miners will at that point be totally reliant on fees for their income. I would assume long before that fees start to become a larger and larger portion, especially as usage increases.

Still overall this is cheap compared to say VISA, which averages about 3% of the transaction. You might not see the VISA fee on the front end of a transaction as a consumer, but you still pay for it on the back-end via higher prices as the merchant needs to pass along the costs to cover his expenses. Some merchants transacting in BTC will give a discount to reflect this, so purchases made with BTC are the same as those made directly with cash.