Right click the icon and run it as administrator and the problem is solved.

Yes but if you do it at install / upgrade time only, then it really shouldn't be a problem especially since it is already requiring permissions for the directory.

I am ready to get this coin party started

Just remember if you make that change you really should implement code to migrate the files on the hard drive for people who already have it installed and running.

Now that I see where it is saving data I see exactly why this is the case and really you should change where it saves the data to, otherwise only people with admin access will ever be able to run this.  As the Program Files (x86) folder on windows is more restrictive than most any other folder.  Had you saved the data like most clients in Users\Appdata\Roaming it would have worked flawlessly out of the box without needing admin permissions.

I can confirm that things do work when you run it as administrator.

All I noticed from doing that is that it ran then another cmd prompt style window opened for a second then everything was closed and nothing actually opened.

Since thats the same error I have, I just tested run.bat and all the happens is it opens runs some stuff really fast and then closes.

I can also confirm this is the case on windows 8.

Errors seem to relate to files and directories not existing that it expects to exist on run.

Okay so here goes, assuming I build say a faucet and a mining pool, what would be the best way to maintain separate balances to prevent any crossover issues between the scripts and them touching coins they shouldn't.

I already know I could create an overlay that tracks the balances separately similar to how things work that have to maintain individual user balances, but I am wondering what other options there are besides running multiple copies of the daemon and duplicating the block chain data and what is the best way to handle this.  I have looked into importprivatekey and that doesn't even look remotely feasible since it will cause the wallet to be unavailable for a period of time due to the rescan not to mention the load overhead that would occur anytime access was needed to a wallet that wasn't currently active.

I have been thinking on this for quite some time, as well as doing a considerable amount of research trying to figure out the very best solution for this, and now I am curious to see what others have to say about this scenario, seeing as the more I plan out my project(s) the more I am starting to need additional wallets/unique balances.

Yea I just hadn't setup an auto withdrawl amount yet

I already hit the cc warning threshold on suprnova and had to do a manual cashout.  Thou that limit should probably be higher since I was only at 18.5k coins confirmed which is less than a single block currently.

Looks to be good now.

suprnova says unable to connect to wallet on pool stats page currently.

Liz02 (Scrypt 2.10 MH/s) has been down a while now.

Lease was extended to compensate for the downtime as well as the time when things weren't running stable in terms of speed.

ADANTS1 (SHA256 395.00 GH/s) has been down for around 2 hours now completely that i know of, looks closer to 3 hours based off both my pools stats and before that it was at times dipping down fairly substantially in speeds for prolonged periods of times due to something on the providers end as my pools were all rock solid during this period of time.  Rig is also still offline as of this posting.

Only a 40 minute extension when things were down for hours?

EZ5 (Scrypt 2.85 MH/s) offline and has been for a bit based on my stat tracking on the pools used, and is unresponsive/off on leaserig as well.

Still haven't heard back basically wasted all my money.