 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
|
|
Yeah, time is needed for us investors to obtain more cash to give to the devs because we work for a living, and can't simply hold ICO's every couple years to live off of. Who want's to harvest the fruits of my labor next? All you need to say is that you can build me an RChain!
|
|
|
|
I was purchasing at ~600 sats on Bittrex. So, my return is more like 28.6x, but who's counting.  Well, you can "sue" anybody for anything you want, but it doesn't make them legally culpable or mean that you are going to win. FACT: It is very impoirtant that initial investors are making profits or else, future funding rounds won't be so lucrative. Cast in point: If Synereo ICO investors had not been as successful, then the second round of funding would not have been enough to fund RChain. The awesome investment profits shared by the first round of funders encouraged the million dollar generosity in the second round of funding. The Synereo team is very effective in winning new investment capital, and because of this fact, we should all feel secure in their ability to secure future funding if necessary. In other words, the Synereo team has a demonstrably proven effective strategy for securing long term development funding. Relax, take a deep breath, and just keep your eyes on the prize (maybe churn a few unstampables in the meantime) because the road is all mapped out (yes, please wipe the drool off your chin, because that does indeed say " RChain will go live in under a year!"):  When we finally receive what we purchased and the second round funders have been made whole, and the first round of funders are back to 50-60x gains, only then will begin to sell moon tickets (3rd round of funding for the exact rocket fuel (or ether gas) amount required to take us to the moon and beyond in perpetuity). The negotiations for these proposals has fallen through. Synereo is now seeking to oust greg and jump to a new tech stack. We've made updates to our summary this morning to reflect new developments. Read on:
https://www.smithandcrown.com/summary-of-synereo-controversy/Ah, copy that. Sorry for the mistake. It appears that Synereo is not purchasing RChain. My mistake was not realizing that Greg Lucius and Greg Meredith was the exact same person. I thought that they were 2 people. Which begs the questions: When is the RChain ICO happening? Why didn't I participate Round 2 ICO AMPS in the official crowdsale instead of buying AMPS in the open market because now I am not eligible for the "30% haircut refund" synereo, scenario. |
|
|
|
|
The STEEM price falling from 1/2 a billion dollars to $20 million had no affect on the market cap of the only other social media crypto?
really?
learn much?
|
|
|
|
-Price of AMP in freefall due to internal friction in the dev team
-several investors of AMP currently taking steps to initiate legal action against Greg
-development of Synereo probably delayed due to technical reasons
FUD! "-Price of AMP in freefall due to internal friction in the dev team" 1. FUD, Price of AMP is not in freefall. Yes, the price of AMPs fell as the Social Media Crypto Sector took a hit when STEEM fell 95% from it's ATH. Synereo only fell back to it's pre-ICO2 levels as one would expect to occur after STEEM crashed from 1/2 a billion in market cap to only $20 million. A rising tide lifts all boats, and vice versa. You cannot sue due to unforseen market forces. Who here thinks that the Synereo ICO2 would have raised so many millions of dollars if the Synereo team had chosen to hold the crowdsale when STEEM was trading at $16 million? "-several investors of AMP currently taking steps to initiate legal action against Greg" 2. FUD, they are just FUDDING to distract from the work that needs to be done to build RChain. No lawsuits will be filed, and if they do, then zero Synereo crowdsale funds will be eligible for scam reimbursement. Again, the AMP price fell 60% as the STEEM price fell 95%. Synereo investors should be thanking the Synereo team for having the best performing Social Media coin of the past few months. YOU ARE WELCOME ICO INVESTORS! -development of Synereo probably delayed due to technical reasons 3. FUD, Synereo development is occurring at breakneck speed behind the scenes, but the results cannot be shown or else the competition will steal them, and steal our thunder in the process by launching the world's first social media coin right from underneath our first mover advantage! Just know this: The Synereo team has the goods because they are smarter than you. This is why they are the devs, and you are the payer of money in this transaction, and not the other way around. JUST WAIT UNTIL THE NEXT ROUND!  |
|
|
|
Greg is going to get his ass kicked out in the cold, and has exposed himself to significant legal repercussions, because he was stupid enough to commit corporate malfeasance because he didn't get his way.
On a positive note, Greg can't do anything but bitch and moan, because Dor is much smarter than he is and holds all the money and private keys. Greg's going to get his founders AMPs taken away, so I wouldn't worry about him crashing the price to zero.
I'm not worrying because the clawback provision in the Synereo contract ensures that investors will be made whole at Greg's expense. This is why trusted teams like this one continuously generate consecutive rounds mind blowing ICO returns that other teams simply cannot. RChain will change everything. Synereo will continue to blow investors minds: "RChain" "Rholang" "SpecialK" "attention economy" mindblow after profuscious mindblow! this is Synereo!  |
|
|
|
I was purchasing at ~600 sats on Bittrex. So, my return is more like 28.6x, but who's counting. Well, you can "sue" anybody for anything you want, but it doesn't make them legally culpable or mean that you are going to win. FACT: It is very impoirtant that initial investors are making profits or else, future funding rounds won't be so lucrative. Cast in point: If Synereo ICO investors had not been as successful, then the second round of funding would not have been enough to fund RChain. The awesome investment profits shared by the first round of funders encouraged the million dollar generosity in the second round of funding. The Synereo team is very effective in winning new investment capital, and because of this fact, we should all feel secure in their ability to secure future funding if necessary. In other words, the Synereo team has a demonstrably proven effective strategy for securing long term development funding. Relax, take a deep breath, and just keep your eyes on the prize (maybe churn a few unstampables in the meantime) because the road is all mapped out (yes, please wipe the drool off your chin, because that does indeed say " RChain will go live in under a year!"):  When we finally receive what we purchased and the second round funders have been made whole, and the first round of funders are back to 50-60x gains, only then will begin to sell moon tickets (3rd round of funding for the exact rocket fuel (or ether gas) amount required to take us to the moon and beyond in perpetuity). |
|
|
|
|
RChain must be developed even though it will support other tokens besides AMPs.
Synereo lost, so they might as well pay for the development of RChain, so at least other coins can win.
To pull funding from RChain just because they are not going to use AMPS exclusively would be to deprive humanity of a public good (RCHain would be a valuable public service whose major cost is development paid by Synereo round 2 funding).
Synereo Round 2 funding was a success, now we must give this money to Greg for RCHain.
RChain changes everything, and Synereo must change everything or it will change nothing!
|
|
|
|
|
It was fake news, and therefore was going to be removed. I thought you knew?
|
|
|
|
|
All anyone can talk about is the confidential transaction ability of XMR, WBB V5, BTS Stealth Transactions, Zero-cash etc, and none of them even have a GUI yet.
The question is, how high will confidential transaction coins fly once their GUI applications come out?
AND WHICH WILL BE RELEASED FIRST?
|
|
|
|
|
Good move, and the GUI is not even out yet. I'm researching coins with confidential transactions now.
|
|
|
|
|
From what I understand, PeerPlays is closer to vaporware than Bitcrystals, but they are meeting their targets along their roadmap to have a MVP out next quarter.
Thanks for the due dilligence.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, 60 second block times!
This changes EVERYTHING!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone here has been begging someone to clone the scalable STEEM blockchain tech minus the ninja mine, and someone has finally done it.
STEEM, of course, is known for its instant and free transaction blockchain with Visa-level scalability that is second to none.
The Peerplays team is distributing their coins with an ICO, and recently verified BTS sharedrop (no ninja mine).
Will the PeerPlays market cap grow bigger than that of STEEM (who did not offer equity to the masses), but rather did a ninja mine? Or will PeerPlays have a bigger market cap since they fairly allowed anyone and everyone to get in on the ground floor as equals.
Im curious to see what the masses think. Thanks for participating in this market survey.
|
|
|
|
 World record for the most money made from a single post by an attention whore ever! What a slut! I guess some people will do anything for attention! (WARNING - NOT SAFE FOR WORK!) https://steemit.com/
|
|
|
|
https://steem.io/roadmap/Now that they have the funding necessary to complete their free market anonymous silk road, I wonder what the price of hookups and blow will open at? 
|
|
|
|
|
