Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 02:58:30 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 [200]
3981  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What do you want to buy with bitcoins? on: February 23, 2013, 09:24:19 AM
Rent, bills and food (I live in Perth, Australia)
3982  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Could Satoshi come back and tell us what he/her thinks about the block size? on: February 22, 2013, 03:51:03 AM
I'm sure that if Satoshi had the need to inject some valuable input, he would contact Gavin. And, who's to say he hasn't done such already.

Ahh, that is nice heart warming thought Smiley

I hope Satoshi isn't dead or locked away. His disappearance was a bit sudden wasn't it?
3983  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Could Satoshi come back and tell us what he/her thinks about the block size? on: February 22, 2013, 03:43:01 AM

If anyone knows Satoshi, getting him/her to come back for a little to see what they think about the block size issue we currently have.

As far as I can tell 3 things stand to eventually destroy Bitcoin and allow another currency to take over.

1. Will transaction fees be enough to secure the network forever? Will miners make enough from TX fee's?
    This is important because everyone gives a different answer, from TX mining will be plenty profitable to Bitcoin will not function properly after 2140.

2. The blocksize issue, This is causing a divide, it would be nice if Satoshi came here and described what he/her thinks would be best.

3. The Satoshi clients needs to have a option to only download the past months worth of blocks, with maybe the network rewarding those who keep full nodes working.

3984  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Ripple Giveaway! on: February 21, 2013, 12:13:27 PM
rBpSXnvCUkG6cAtk1KxaRKvM7wPcrJot5s
3985  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: After testing Ripple... on: February 20, 2013, 11:17:13 AM
Unfortunately it looks like having 100 billion XRP that can be traded for other currency is a little devious, they say its anti spam, then they should have truly complemented BTC by using .00000001 BTC for anti spam (or .0000001 or .000001 ,etc...)
There's no good way to do this. Bitcoins could only be held on the Ripple system if someone were to gateway them, and there's no way to trust a particular gateway without having a central authority. Also, that would make Ripple's anti-spam system a Bitcoin spamming system as every Ripple transaction required a Bitcoin micro-transactions.

Quote
I they really wanted to focus on trust based IOUs they could have easily used BTC to facilitate the transactions in small almost worthless denominations. But instead they create a stealth currency.
We honestly had no idea how to make that work for the reasons I describe above. Perhaps you could sketch out how your scheme would work.

Quote
And a small handful own all the XRP? with current trades on various forums and sites making these people multi-millionaires already.
Billions of XRP will be given away shortly, as the system is ready to scale.

Quote
I see no reason why someone could not build a ripple trust system on top of BTC.
I can give you a long list of reasons why that won't work. Maybe solutions could be found to each one of them, but I suspect that you don't see any reasons just because you haven't looked too closely at the problem. (But if you think you can make it work, by all means please work on it!)

Yeah that is a good point, the blockchain spam on BTC would get out of hand, even worse than Satoshi Dice. I imagined, maybe naively than the BTC would be used in the system maybe internally to the ripple blockchain, and when people make IOU's the spent BTC would be evenly distributed out to all the users (Is this what happens to XRP when spent for IOU transactions) But the important thing being all this transaction data would remain internal to the ripple blockchain until someone wanted to spend them outside of the ripple network.

This means people want to make a trust network and make a IOU, then they case in some BTC to the ripple account, and use small denominations of BTC to make the IOU transaction, just like XRP does now. The spent BTC is redistributed to all users (internally a "satoshi" can be split into a billion peices, so if a billion transactions were made in a day each user would gain 1 satoshi.) and if a user wanted BTC back they cash it out of the ripple blockchain.

Maybe that would be more feasible if a satoshi could be split into a billion pieces already....

Again this is a naive viewpoint from myself, I have no idea if what I just described is implementable at all.
3986  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: After testing Ripple... on: February 20, 2013, 01:52:52 AM
Hmm, they should have used BTC in denominations of "satoshi" for the spam problem, this would maybe allow ripple to gain adoption and people would focus on the trust system more.

Unfortunately it looks like having 100 billion XRP that can be traded for other currency is a little devious, they say its anti spam, then they should have truly complemented BTC by using .00000001 BTC for anti spam (or .0000001 or .000001 ,etc...)

The XRP, we are told is all about anti spam and its not meant to compete with BTC. This is a load of crap. Lies lies lies!

I they really wanted to focus on trust based IOUs they could have easily used BTC to facilitate the transactions in small almost worthless denominations. But instead they create a stealth currency.

This new ripple is far too deceptive.

And a small handful own all the XRP? with current trades on various forums and sites making these people multi-millionaires already.

I see no reason why someone could not build a ripple trust system on top of BTC.
3987  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Update on the Minecraft Bitcoin Faucet on: February 20, 2013, 12:51:18 AM
Or build a giant statue of Satoshi Smiley

So a giant question mark then? Smiley
3988  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: [BETA]Bitfinex - Meta-Exchange and margin trading on: February 14, 2013, 12:10:20 AM
I can't access Bitfinex, does anyone know whats wrong? Isn't Bitfinex hosted with AWS? What's the problem here?

Edit:
It looks like Bitcoin price is falling sharp right now, maybe Bitfinex is being drowned out?
3989  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker on: January 31, 2013, 08:51:59 AM
Does anyone think after $20 its going to drop?
3990  Other / Beginners & Help / A question about transaction fees on: January 30, 2013, 11:28:51 AM
Hi ya.

I was reading this:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=139933.0
and dree12 spoke about how the fees can eventually be really small and people could make more from transactions.

Could someone please explain what dree12 is saying but with numbers?

I understand that right now the Bitcoin network runs at about 1 transaction every second and people are paying about 0.01 Bitcoin for this.

How would the future look? 5000 transactions every second at 0.00001 Bitcoin perhaps?

Also whats to stop everyone just paying 0 and thus destroying the entire network?

Cheers

(I would reply to that thread I linked but I can't because this is a new account)

Pages: « 1 ... 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 [200]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!