 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 »
|
|
Will work with old accounts or only works with new ones?
Will work european amazon customers or only for US?
|
|
|
|
|
hi whats your rate on ebay and amazon?
|
|
|
|
How much you are looking
I got an offer of 50$ so I'm not sure if you are offering more ? just let me know what's your offer in PM (I won't be using skype btw) I could be very interested buying paypal accounts, with similar criteria, I think 50$ is cheap price for this kind of product. My biggest concern is if anyone know how to do this business safely, I think escrow can't work with this kind of product. How the buyer knows, seller will not contact paypal and claim lost email access and forget password? I'm afraid is very hard changing all paypal details without redflaging the account (change email, password, phone contact) and also would require some weeks to do it. |
|
|
|
|
I'm interested if we can deal trough escrow.
|
|
|
|
|
Interested if Escrow available.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm interested only with Escrow
|
|
|
|
|
I will be interested if Escrow available.
|
|
|
|
|
buying MSDN Admin account.
Please send your offers with prices bellow.
Only via ESCROW.
|
|
|
|
 best of all you do a signed message with your wallet address how to sign message with my wallet address 1LB7R2Bt3UWPRdeBJwr78oZ4KozEnwDhTd |
|
|
|
my bitcoin wallet 12VP5FXHA2KWy7r2Xiu1nQFmuS6upAvrpS
quoted |
|
|
|
|
not all users who wearing signature are spammer,many users are using forum as they do regular without making posts for signatures but some of them are posting for signature income,I think pay per post signature campaign should be banned, its the biggest reason for spam on forum, more they spam more they get paid.
|
|
|
|
|
I have to post my address in dis topic or post it to the link you shared
|
|
|
|
sgminer's changes, as far as I can see, are shit. I'm using either bfgminer 3.10.0 or cgminer 3.7.2 for my scrypt mining - those two miners actually work. sgminer doesn't work at all well. I think they're adding 24" chrome spinner rims to an AMC Gremlin.
I use a mix of HD6xxx, HD7xxx, and R9 GPUs on Windows 7.
+1, I have not yet tried out SGminer, but early versions of cgminer are what I still use when I want to do things such as solo mine Scrypt alts. I gave it a shot with BFGminer for Scrypt mining and had it running fairly well after some initial issues, but since I have a large farm, and need the capability to solo mine for profitability of newer "crap coins", I can't do that without issue with BFG yet. I don't understand the "rift" between SGminer and BFGminer though, I don't know why there always needs to be drama on any similar products. Human nature? I don't think Apple is going to join Google because they provide similar services, so how about we live and let live? Much of the confusion over supporting BFGminer has always come from Luke's past comments on all Scrypt coins, and while they may have been retracted and there is a larger development team now committed to that area, it doesn't change the statements. CK said similar things, and then dropped support. I'd venture to say that the Scrypt community needs someone committed to that area to lead up a project, and while many here say they should just join and contribute here, I'm not fully convinced that a new project isn't a better thing for the community. I'm also a believe in completely separate miners for each protocol, however ASICs with mixed mining have made that unlikely. I think one of the bigger problems with scrypt mining in general is the fragmentation of drivers vs current software. Many people with large rigs (or even smaller ones) found older driver configurations that work great, but when combined with newer drivers those configurations do not function as well. Add in the changes to AMD's SDK and compiling, and we are not seeing scrypt CL advance and keeping pace with new drivers in both stability and performance. Without a willingness to optimize for the newest SDK's (because of reduced performance or reprieved reduced performance/stability) and try to increase performance using future centric thought (modern SDKs and modern driver support), scrypt is stuck in a rut as far as gpu performance. If anything, scrypt asics will become desirable simply for "plug and play" that should do away with these complicated factors. If I could get my old 5770 to mine without rolling all the way back to 2012 Catylist drivers, I'd be mining scrypt with it right now. However, seeing as it is my only desktop graphics cards, I want my gaming and scrypt too, and I can't have both (SGMiner, or BFGMiner be damned, neither work correctly for me). |
|
|
|
But in this case it is two different alog., SHA-256 and Scrypt. Hence, two different client instances, one for each alog.. @ManeBjorn suggestion may work, but LukeJr has stated that support for Scrypt is no longer happening in BFGMiner. That was the reason that CGMiner got forked to produce SGMiner. Don't get me wrong I love BFGMiner for SHA-256, and I wish the support was there for Scrypt. With the growing interest in Scrypt processing I would hope that someone would come to LukeJr's aid and do the support. I am sure with the every changing hardware for SHA-256 he is very busy supporting BFGMiner. We who use it should donate some to of what we mine to the person who is making it happen. If you wish to donate to the author of scrypt support, Con Kolivas, for his past
work (he no longer maintains this), please send your donations to:
15qSxP1SQcUX3o4nhkfdbgyoWEFMomJ4rZ Perhaps this opening line from README.scrypt is confusing? It is simply crediting Kolivas as the original writer of scrypt support and giving a donation address. SGminer is a fork of cgminer, and cgminer has discontinued scrypt support, but bfgminer still has it and it will be carried as long as people want support. I am just as confused as Luke-Jr on why the SGMiner crew wouldn't want to collaborate to improve scrypt support in bfgminer (if it possible). Since my own card doesn't seem to like scrypt, I haven't been able to properly compare SGminer and bfgminer's scrypt support from a usability standpoint. :/ |
|
|
|
Nice coin....... no .dll's with the windows wallet? :X Ceiling cat is not amused! |
|
|
|
Took awhile, but I just received my refund today. Better late then never.  |
|
|
|
this is no fork. there was a bad source released 9/8 on linux and people mined it. This was fixed as soon as it was discovered quite awhile ago. The original TEK chain has never forked.
This is current.
current chain is blocks" : 57168,
"moneysupply" : 57143.91383500,
i
I pulled the newest code of tekcoind, and I kept getting cycled into clients with the wrong block chain (and matching version clients) when building on Linux. Is there anyway to get a code update that updates the client version, and that they can detect a client that is on this corrupted block chain and prevent them from communicating with newer clients? I'd be nice to download the block chain on a Linux (server) without having to get 2xxxx blocks from windows and moving it. I even tried building from the posted source code, and no change. |
|
|
|
|
Three people i know (myself included) are having trouble getting up and solo mining. I tried in both Windows and Linux with built code, and i can get the block chain, but RPC isn't coming online.
*edit* fixed.. somehow. O_o
Op should add rpcallow= stuff to default conf too to avoid confusion.
|
|
|
|
|
