Hello, I delete the avatar and company signature prematurely.  If possible, I ask you to save me my steaks for the work done. The telegram group told me that I can qualify for the earned steaks. Thank you so much.

I understand that the guys are not going to give up and are starting to offer more and more dubious offers for bitcointalk users.  
October 19  placed another topic in the Marketplace: Service:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5194320.msg52813419#msg52813419.
 In this case, the Bounty company has already come up with to offer not only its tokens for the work done, but also the minimum amount of Bitcoin in order to attract more participants.  But in my opinion this is another manipulation, because their actions aimed at making the Bounty company offer similar to the most popular bounty companies on bitcointalk, which pay rewards in Bitcoin.  Definitely, such a Bounty company will attract only stupid participants, because no one will believe in their promise.  This whole company will fly out very suspiciously, because if professionals worked on this project, then they would analyze the market and understand that such a high price of the token is unrealistic for them.  And to promise such an overly unnatural reward for the participants is another manipulation.

I’m sorry, friend, apparently I really didn’t understand you, because we are talking about the corresponding bounty company, and I took the answer to my account.  I apologize.

The guys on the forum already have a negative rating and this is what is poorly displayed on the project that they are trying to promote.  In any case, the guys need to make a lot of efforts to show the effectiveness of the project and find some other ways to attract potential customers, because a negative rating for this will be a very big obstacle.  I can’t even imagine what needs to be done so that bitcointalk users distinguish between the negative rating of the account on the forum and the real quality, as well as the potential of their game resource.

It’s unfortunate that I missed the opportunity to take part in beta testing.  But still, I would like to know these moments, why do you have, apart from Twitter, no longer any public relations, such as Telegram?  In my opinion, the official group of your project should be in order to announce information and to communicate with potential customers online.  In addition, how will it be possible to find information about what the results of beta testing turned out to be?

I can’t buy altcoins that I doubt.  In any case, every project that I invest in is promising for me and I will not leave these coins for long-term storage without a panic mood.  But just the decline in the cryptocurrency market gives me the opportunity to replenish my reserves and invest my funds at competitive prices.  In addition, the decline in the market indicates how projects react in order to once again choose among them more powerful and promising ones.

If it were possible to easily determine the prospectivity of coins, then all cryptocurrency users would be rich, and bad projects would disappear from the market without a trace.  But unfortunately this is not so.  To date, it is best to invest only in the highest-rated cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, as well as in projects that already have a real product, such as BNB, and also show real potential in the future.  I would like to mention the Ripple coin, which, despite the current red market indicators, still shows a very good trend, and all this is due to the fact that the Ripples are attracted to new development opportunities. Today, Ripple is interesting primarily because new partners have appeared who work with one of the world's largest developers of financial services software Finastra.
 And in turn, this company is a partner for more than half a hundred leading banks in the world.

Undoubtedly, the current price indices for rating cryptocurrencies are much higher than they were at the end of 2018.  Nevertheless, only Bitcoin and Ethereum can be considered good indicators, which have improved since the beginning of 2019, but in relation to all other cryptocurrencies, there is still a bear market.

In my opinion, the value of ethereum is not at all that there was a market for ico companies that was completely compromised, although in any case it was fraudulent projects and new projects that did not have real prospects, it was these companies that had a very negative impact on the development of ethereum.  But today, Ethereum still remains a very good platform with smart Smart contracts, with good technical characteristics, as well as a coin, with a full blockchain, which will soon be used as a means of payment. Therefore, I believe that Ethereum has a very great future, and the team still continues to reveal its potential.

Perhaps you are right, but the United States, France and Germany, which have repeatedly spoken negatively about Libra, are also part of the G7.  And the US government is demanding a moratorium on the Libra project. Based on this, there is doubt that the G7 will act in the interests of Facebook.

Today I read information that a G7 report on cryptocurrency was published.
 The authors of this document stated that bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are not reliable means of payment and seem dangerous for storage.
 Nevertheless, the report refers to the fact that stable coins are the exception and that such coins have real potential for everyday use.
 The team that conducted the research turned up that not a single global project of stable coins can be legally used until the relevant laws are adopted for control, regulation, etc.
 But the document also mentions that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are still a highly speculative asset class.

 Guys, I ask you to comment on this matter.  After all, many are interested in the question of how exactly the G7 report will affect the entire cryptocurrency market.

I very much hope that the report of the Big Seven, which was published in the media regarding Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, will not affect the entire cryptocurrency market.  The report says that cryptocurrencies are not recognized as a reliable means of payment and means of accumulation due to their instability.  The only exceptions are stable cryptocurrencies, which are less exposed to risks.  The report also says that stable coins will not be used on a full scale until all problems with control, regulation are resolved and laws are amended.  Based on this, you need to more carefully choose coins for investment.

I understand what you are hinting at, but I believe that not only the hunter, but also the bounty team of the company must fulfill all the conditions of the transaction.  In my case, the spreadsheet has not been updated for four weeks now and no one answers questions.  Each of us must value our work.  If not us, then who? 

dear yahoo62278, I know you as a truly professional and honest Bounty manager who thoroughly knows how this whole system works.  I completely agree with your opinion that most of the Bounty companies that operate today do not even fulfill a tenth of what they promised for hunters.  Nevertheless, I’m sure that you, as a Bounty manager, always control the quality of the work done by the Bounty Hunters, but in this case I doubt that the unknown person who controls the Swirge Bounty company will do it as well as you  .
I want to draw your attention to the fact that the team stated that it was not going to conduct any ico.  This is another question that remains unanswered, where are they going to take that kind of money.
I am sure that because of this Bounty company, many forum participants will still suffer who will not delve into the essence of the problem and who will definitely be accused of spam.

If it were an investment company or a new cryptocurrency exchange project, then I would have had much less doubt.  If you find these numbers in a bounty topic, aren't the team too strong ambitions?

Hello guys.  I want to draw your attention to the new bounty company "Swirge..com Signature Campaign | New Decentralized Social Media Platform" :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5193268.new#new, which offers forum users too much reward and at the same time conditions can be too sad for bitcointalk.
 Please note that the cost of 1,000,000 OKU is $ 200k according to the statements of the team.
 Through mathematical calculations, we find out the price of one token:
 200000 / 1,000,000 = $ 0.2 for 1 token

 If you pay attention to the conditions of signature compaing, then each member with a Full Member rating will be able to receive a reward of 250 OKU for 20 posts per day.

 And again we calculate that:
 20 Posts / 250 tokens = 5000 tokens per day,
 5000 x $ 0.2 = $ 1000

 And so, gentlemen, $ 1,000 per day  for each member with a Full member rating, while the advertised resource is a social networking platform that does not have great financial value and does not bring such income that every user has the opportunity to sell their tokens at the above price.

 (I only express my opinion and concern.)
 In my opinion, this is abuse and possible fraud.  Be careful.


And if you follow the site link and pay attention to its design, then its appearance resembles the last century and confirms that no one tried to invest at least a little money in this resource.  At the same time, the team said that they have no intentions to conduct ico.

 But the most important thing is the condition of the company’s signature, 20 posts per day, which will definitely provoke spam on the forum.  Many users will be seduced by such a generous reward.
 Thanks for your attention.

but nevertheless, according to statistics, it is already clear that the activity of players is falling along with the price of bitcoin.  None of the owners of Bitcoin will give their coins on the cheap.  It is to continue the game that other cryptocurrency options are provided.

The fact is that I get real pleasure from betting on sports because I only bet on the teams that I believe in and the results of which I constantly monitor.  In any case, it is not the amount of winnings that pleases me more, but the very fact of Victory, not only after the bet, but also the fact of Victory of my team, in this case it is about football.

Of course, I understand that each person has his own preferences regarding national football teams, as well as his own views on their results.  But at the current European Football Championship, I really regret that I did not believe in the strength of my national team of Ukraine.  I was really struck by the result of the match Ukraine-Portugal, where Ukraine chose the victory against the champion with a score of 2:1.  Maybe I'll take a chance and bet on Victory in the next round.

Of course, the reputation of Bitcoin was very much affected by a significant decrease in bitcoin capitalization.  But we all know what causes such problems.  I believe that if the scaling of Bitcoin, including transaction costs, changes, it will improve the investment climate for investors.  Several times there has been news in the media that large companies are interested in Bitcoin transactions, but it is precisely the possible shortage of transactions that scares them from real cooperation with Bitcoin.