|
1521
|
Local / Ekonomi / Re: Segwit2 kesinleştimi?
|
on: July 20, 2017, 07:10:54 PM
|
İbreden kasıt edilen %80 node desteği ile destek alinmis olup, Segwit aktive
edilmesi Bitcoin aginda baslamistir.
Segwit etkinleştirildikten 90 gün sonra bitcoin blok
boyutunun 1MB'tan 2MB'a yükselterek hard fork'u başlatmaktır.
Henüz bitmedi, yanlış bilgi vermeyin. Kalan 48 bloğun en az 33'ü bip 91 sinyali veren madenciler tarafından bulunursa, segwit 2 hafta sonra aktife olmak üzere kitlenecek. https://www.xbt.eu/Dikkatli okursanız, bittiğini belirtmedim  segwit aktife edilmesi bitcoin ağında başlamadı, bip 91 kabul edilirse başlayacak. |
|
|
|
|
1522
|
Local / Fonlar / Re: 3 Aylık Ticaret Fonu Ödeme Alanı
|
on: July 19, 2017, 07:43:56 PM
|
S a
Payını makul fiata havale-eft tl dolar cinsinden satmak isteyen, DM ile ulaşabilir.
Bobun teyit etmesi durumunda.
Btc ile ödeme yaparsan 16 payımı satabilirim. Kur; pay başı 0.17 Arkadaşla anlaşamadık. Belirttiğim kur ile almak isteyen olursa devredebilirim. |
|
|
|
|
1523
|
Local / Fonlar / Re: 3 Aylık Ticaret Fonu Ödeme Alanı
|
on: July 19, 2017, 05:01:50 PM
|
S a
Payını makul fiata havale-eft tl dolar cinsinden satmak isteyen, DM ile ulaşabilir.
Bobun teyit etmesi durumunda.
Btc ile ödeme yaparsan 16 payımı satabilirim. Kur; pay başı 0.17 Mesaj gönderiyorum Newbie olduğunuz için mesaj göndermede sorun yaşayabilirsiniz. Ben size mesaj gönderdim. |
|
|
|
|
1524
|
Local / Fonlar / Re: 3 Aylık Ticaret Fonu Ödeme Alanı
|
on: July 19, 2017, 04:21:24 PM
|
S a
Payını makul fiata havale-eft tl dolar cinsinden satmak isteyen, DM ile ulaşabilir.
Bobun teyit etmesi durumunda.
Btc ile ödeme yaparsan 16 payımı satabilirim. Kur; pay başı 0.17 |
|
|
|
|
1526
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: [BOUNTY][ANN] openANX - Real World Application of Decentralized Exchanges
|
on: July 18, 2017, 06:29:39 AM
|
Why have you reduced total tokens allocated to blog bounties silently? It was 40k now its 15k? Not like you are giving any good bounty at all.
Hi needmoney, Regarding the blog campaign, I admit that the planning could have been better. There were many things that I did not anticipate, for example; - the number of participants - the expected time I wanted to have this bounty open for would not work - the amount of people just creating empty blogspot pages with 0 traffic only for the bounty - many people just copy the ANN or whitepaper, and just add 1 barely original sentence to circumvent my rules - people posting translations of the ANN in many different languages, hoping that I won't be able to tell what is going on (its so obvious) - misinformation (eg: someone wrote that the OAX token gives out dividends) I hope people can understand that the bounty programs are a 2 way street. I can reward OAX, but I also require articles with thought, and original input. With the previous staking system, I had a lot of difficulty giving out justifiable rewards for those who contribute quality articles. Thus, I needed to modify the blog bounty structure. The system I have is still under review, I will replace the spreadsheet link once I have the stakes set. I hope people can understand my decisions. It may seem like a harsh deduction, however, the modified stake system makes up for it. I care for the community, and wish to reward those who are part of it.As always, I am happy to help out, and answer any questions. You can also reach out to me on slack or telegram. - tlynch I support your decision. Thats very good to hear. There is however, a better system for this. Just like irfan_pak does, you can basically reject every single low effort article, giving them no bounties at all. But that doesn't change the fact that you offered 40,000 OAX (which is way lower in total supply regarding other campaigns) and those who have a quality article should have a right to share that allocated amount you promised on the beginning. In other words, I support your decision to eliminate copy&pastes and etc., but you shouldn't have changed the reward amount as it is not fair for those who actually wrote a quality article and put effort into them. Think about it, lets say there are 40 quality articles worth recieving a bounty. Before the reduction they would recieve 1000 OAX each. Now they will recieve 15 000/40 rewards. This reduction basically is not fair.  I understand your concern. For me to be able to give out the full 40,000 OAX, I would need to extend the blog bounty for a long time. Perhaps another 2 - 3 months. I think its more efficient to just cut the bounty short and recycle the OAX into a new campaign (with better rules) ...which I will announce soon  But thats the problem, you haven't said this before the bounty campaign. If that was your intention (to have the blog bounty up at least months) you should have said that before you started your campaign. People assumed, like other bounties, that they will share the allocated 40,000 OAX based on their stakes. Now, basically, those who have written quality articles, put time and effort to their work will recieve possibly 2.5x less for what they were expecting or promised. I am advocating this even though I don't have a article submitted purely because campaigns started to make it a regular thing to change the allocated amount which is not honest and professional. If you must, eliminate %90 of the articles. |
|
|
|
|
1529
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: [BOUNTY][ANN] openANX - Real World Application of Decentralized Exchanges
|
on: July 17, 2017, 12:43:57 PM
|
Why have you reduced total tokens allocated to blog bounties silently? It was 40k now its 15k? Not like you are giving any good bounty at all.
Hi needmoney, Regarding the blog campaign, I admit that the planning could have been better. There were many things that I did not anticipate, for example; - the number of participants - the expected time I wanted to have this bounty open for would not work - the amount of people just creating empty blogspot pages with 0 traffic only for the bounty - many people just copy the ANN or whitepaper, and just add 1 barely original sentence to circumvent my rules - people posting translations of the ANN in many different languages, hoping that I won't be able to tell what is going on (its so obvious) - misinformation (eg: someone wrote that the OAX token gives out dividends) I hope people can understand that the bounty programs are a 2 way street. I can reward OAX, but I also require articles with thought, and original input. With the previous staking system, I had a lot of difficulty giving out justifiable rewards for those who contribute quality articles. Thus, I needed to modify the blog bounty structure. The system I have is still under review, I will replace the spreadsheet link once I have the stakes set. I hope people can understand my decisions. It may seem like a harsh deduction, however, the modified stake system makes up for it. I care for the community, and wish to reward those who are part of it.As always, I am happy to help out, and answer any questions. You can also reach out to me on slack or telegram. - tlynch I support your decision. Thats very good to hear. There is however, a better system for this. Just like irfan_pak does, you can basically reject every single low effort article, giving them no bounties at all. But that doesn't change the fact that you offered 40,000 OAX (which is way lower in total supply regarding other campaigns) and those who have a quality article should have a right to share that allocated amount you promised on the beginning. In other words, I support your decision to eliminate copy&pastes and etc., but you shouldn't have changed the reward amount as it is not fair for those who actually wrote a quality article and put effort into them. Think about it, lets say there are 40 quality articles worth recieving a bounty. Before the reduction they would recieve 1000 OAX each. Now they will recieve 15 000/40 rewards. This reduction basically is not fair. |
|
|
|
|
1534
|
Local / Konu Dışı / Re: domuz eti ?
|
on: July 13, 2017, 05:39:04 AM
|
Dünyayı ve üzerinde yürüdüğümüz toprakları yaratan Allah'tır ve onun kanunları ile yaşamamız gerekir, İnsanların keyiflerine göre değil!
Bu iddianızı destekleyecek somut bir delil, ya da argümanınızı en azından yerinde ve tümdengelimli olacak şekilde öncülleriyle birlikte bizimle paylaşır mısınız? |
|
|
|
|
1535
|
Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone
|
on: July 12, 2017, 07:40:54 PM
|
So let me get this straight. You put a negative trust on 2 trusted members of the Turkish community even though everone here says they know them IRL. I've even meet them twice. You can check various telegram groups where mentalpanda and twn writes seperately. @Lauda, I know you are trying to keep the forum safe and eliminate cheaters/scammers as much possible. I appreciate your effort as this froum became a big part of my life since 2013. I've met a loot of cool people and I still do. mentalpanda and twn are just two them. Thank you.  |
|
|
|
|
1537
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Populous ICO Frauding Over Promises
|
on: July 12, 2017, 12:01:54 AM
|
This has already been taken care of now delete this garbage thread
I've seen some people agreed upon 1000 PPT each. If every blog bounty participant agrees with this decision, I'll lock this thread and ask for a deletion. You have all agreed to be bribed with an amount that is less than you were promised in the first place? Or am I missing something here? If every blog bounty participant agrees with this decision, I'll lock this thread and ask for a deletion.
Your prerogative - if people are happy with the "resolution" that has been promised, then I'll remove the rating once others' have confirmed this. Again, unless I have missed something here, I don't see why you would settle for less than you were promised. But if people are happy with it, so be it.. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I'll check in on this again tomorrow and adjust the rating if necessary. As I said, its not on my hands. If the other 25 people agrees to 1000 PPT, I can't do much. I've checked the slack and basically the CEO said take 1000 PPT or nothing. So it seems like some people agreed. I'm in no way happy with the resolution but it feels like they will not send anything if people doesn't agree. |
|
|
|
|
1538
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Populous ICO Frauding Over Promises
|
on: July 11, 2017, 11:21:30 PM
|
This has already been taken care of now delete this garbage thread
I've seen some people agreed upon 1000 PPT each. If every blog bounty participant agrees with this decision, I'll lock this thread and ask for a deletion. |
|
|
|
|
1540
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Populous ICO Frauding Over Promises
|
on: July 11, 2017, 10:09:31 PM
|
|
- snip -
I really don't have time for this. Populous team keeps sending me PMs. Sorry, I can't be arsed anymore with these guys. Anyone has a problem with them should open their own accusation thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
