If you actively monitor new technologies and are able to distinguish a fraudulent project from an honest and legal one, and this is not so easy lately, then participating in a signature campaign can really make you richer and happier.

Despite the sufficient popularity of IEO, participation in most cases will bring a very modest profit, since there are still few really worthy honest promising projects.

Cryptocurrency market is not intended for weak and unbalanced players. Complaints, uncertainty of victory, and negative thinking in no way contribute to growth and do not lead to success.

It is absolutely impossible to represent the world of cryptography without ETH. And it is difficult to imagine how much time would have passed without the intervention of the genius Vitalik so that crowdfunding would become as accessible as now.

Even if the coin is shitty, but it is being traded for a small amount, it means that it is still interesting for the exchange. Absolutely illiquid coins will in any case leave the cryptocurrency market.

Indeed, ERC20, due to its versatility and scale, is attractive for fraud, and this, of course, adversely affects the cryptography market as a whole. But progress does not stand still. These are only temporary difficulties at this stage in the development of the entire cryptoindustry.

Indeed, participation in Airdrop is not safe lately, as fraudsters can easily get your data, as well as easy access to your wallets. Therefore, it is an unjustified risk that is unlikely to bring you profit and success.

Confidentiality is an integral part of the blockchain world, but KYC helps to solve some of the problems in combating fraud until a more reliable user identification mechanism with a decent level of confidentiality appears.

In all cases, if the project fails, the organizers are tempted to blame anyone in order to evade responsibility to the vain expectations of all participants. And bounty hunters are first on the list of victims. But everyone understands this perfectly, and there is no point in looking for the guilty parties of the project’s inconsistency, since there is no time or desire for this.

Indeed, the cryptocurrency market is very dangerous and does not tolerate mistakes and hasty conclusions. And this means that you should not invest all your savings in one basket, regardless of the most reliable ratings and news. Risks must be calculated. If you are lucky today, it does not mean that you will be lucky tomorrow.

It is fair to note that the success of a project does not depend only on the rating. Often the project’s fate depends on many factors, which, given the volatility of the market behavior and various manipulations with them, turn any rating into a temporary forecast.

Everything is relative. Binans rightfully earned a good reputation. In conditions of real competition, this exchange continues to surprise and delight both regular users and beginners. And the temporary difficulties associated with hacking will not affect their long-term success and rating.

company for a fee after receiving the list actively appear on the market for a variety of reasons. Mainly for the implementation of their future plans to improve the product and its further development.

It's fair to say that some IEOs were really successful, but still far from being as successful as ICO in 2017. But, despite the various manipulations of IEO with its tokens on its own exchanges, this is unlikely to affect the success of ETH.

Currently, it is not recommended to participate in bounty companies with excessive rewards, as well as with an unformed product and an overly saturated list of questionable ideas and services.

If the team intends to be honest and professional, then all updates will be timely and aggregate activity will be high, since investors are the most important and key element of their success and advancement. Non-observance of elementary norms of trust in this case is unacceptable.

Indeed, the most friendly to cryptography are progressive countries such as Singapore, Japan and Korea, as they are the first to introduce and prove the value of new technologies for society and do it quite successfully.

It is fair to say that the success of the company in most cases does not depend on the honesty of managers and unexpected changes in the rules of generosity for bounty hunters. In general, KYC is not very problematic, but much more often the choice of the company does not meet your expectations due to a project that did not take place for various reasons.

At present, the more generosity, the less trust in the project, the success of the project now largely depends on the market, product and team, and the organizers are in no hurry to part with their coins. Bounty hunters will no longer be able to achieve the level of 2017 awards.

If the legendary participant has established itself in its history of promoting successful projects, has a green trust, then perhaps you should follow the advice. But it still does not give any guarantees for you, since the success of the project depends on numerous factors and the professionalism of the team.