|
Does the project have a bounty campaign?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. How much tokens were put on the ICO?
|
|
|
|
|
I haven’t find any info on the distribution of the funds collected on the site of the project. Where can I learn about this?
|
|
|
|
|
What currencies can I use to invest at the ICO stage?
|
|
|
|
|
What is the difference between CRV and CRP tokens?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello. What is the end of the bounty program?
|
|
|
|
Hello. You are saying the the token will continue being issued but it desnt mean that users will always return it back to the platform.
It doesnt make any sense. You bought tokens for $2 each and refusing to sell it for $50. Yes but tokens will be bought out and burnt which means their price on secondary market will grow. No doubt but by then they wont mean anything to the platform. I dont think the demand is going to be high. You are wrong. a lot of services accept only Hamster tokens as a payment that’s why the demand will be there. They will start buying tokens back only after the platform will be transferred to vendors. Tokens will be removed from circulation. Okay. why are they so sure they are going to have enough money to buy back all the tokens? |
|
|
|
Hello. You are saying the the token will continue being issued but it desnt mean that users will always return it back to the platform.
It doesnt make any sense. You bought tokens for $2 each and refusing to sell it for $50. Yes but tokens will be bought out and burnt which means their price on secondary market will grow. No doubt but by then they wont mean anything to the platform. I dont think the demand is going to be high. You are wrong. a lot of services accept only Hamster tokens as a payment that’s why the demand will be there. |
|
|
|
Hello. You are saying the the token will continue being issued but it desnt mean that users will always return it back to the platform.
It doesnt make any sense. You bought tokens for $2 each and refusing to sell it for $50. Yes but tokens will be bought out and burnt which means their price on secondary market will grow. |
|
|
|
|
Hello. You are saying the the token will continue being issued but it desnt mean that users will always return it back to the platform.
|
|
|
|
You actively cooperate with third-party solutions. Are you afraid that they will begin to partially control your project?
In the street is the 21st century. All the conditions are clearly stipulated in the contracts, so I'm absolutely calm about this. However, the same COMIT is vital for the internal ecosystem of MoxyOne. Its failure will lead to significant delays in payments. This option is almost completely eliminated, due to the fact that MoxyOne retains full control over the assets of its users. That is, liquidity providers or users can use other solutions for integration? |
|
|
|
You actively cooperate with third-party solutions. Are you afraid that they will begin to partially control your project?
In the street is the 21st century. All the conditions are clearly stipulated in the contracts, so I'm absolutely calm about this. However, the same COMIT is vital for the internal ecosystem of MoxyOne. Its failure will lead to significant delays in payments. |
|
|
|
|
You actively cooperate with third-party solutions. Are you afraid that they will begin to partially control your project?
|
|
|
|
|
What is the price per token?
|
|
|
|
Why don't you use the Proof-of-Stake protocol in its original form? It scales perfectly.
Because the Spade team needs to ensure the delivery of random numbers at the protocol level. I don't see a problem with that. It is a matter of a few minutes to arrange data delivery within the blockchain. I suggest you get acquainted with the white paper. The team not only wants to supply on-chain data, but also to generate random numbers on-chain. That’s not a bad idea. However, are you sure, that it has the right to exist? Previously, I met only theories related to this idea Yes, the team is currently working on its implementation. And the Ouroboros protocol is a striking confirmation of this. Well, I flipped through the white paper. The idea of Ouroboros seems very real to me. However, I would like to know when the final version of the Spade protocol, which can be used in real online casinos, appear. |
|
|
|
|
According to the results of the bounty program, I will earn a certain number of tokens. How can I withdraw it?
|
|
|
|
Why don't you use the Proof-of-Stake protocol in its original form? It scales perfectly.
Because the Spade team needs to ensure the delivery of random numbers at the protocol level. I don't see a problem with that. It is a matter of a few minutes to arrange data delivery within the blockchain. I suggest you get acquainted with the white paper. The team not only wants to supply on-chain data, but also to generate random numbers on-chain. That’s not a bad idea. However, are you sure, that it has the right to exist? Previously, I met only theories related to this idea |
|
|
|
Why don't you use the Proof-of-Stake protocol in its original form? It scales perfectly.
Because the Spade team needs to ensure the delivery of random numbers at the protocol level. I don't see a problem with that. It is a matter of a few minutes to arrange data delivery within the blockchain. |
|
|
|
|
Why don't you use the Proof-of-Stake protocol in its original form? It scales perfectly.
|
|
|
|
|
Good afternoon. How much money has already been collected?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
