How did you understand from this massage that the bountyhive has troubles? I believe they just wanted to give the last chance to bounty participants to add their wallets to receive rewards, because some tokens like EOS require their own wallet.

I tried a lot of cloud mining solutions, but the most of them are very expensive. Generally, a one year mining contract brings you at its peak 5-15 percent profit if you take contract costs into consideration, so I just moved to Hashnest, where they are not trying to rob you with mining costs.

There is a bunch of ways of how you can earn alts. For example, the most simple thing is to join airdrops, that you can find on this forum or on external websites. Furthermore, if you have social media accounts and talent to write, you can join social media or article bounties. You would earn much higher rewards from participating in bounty programmes.

Hope that BTC will stay on top, because in my opinion a centralised coin without a limited supply, does not deserve to be even in top 10 ranking from coinmarketcap, but for some strange reasons crypto community is still supporting XRP.

Every project needs time to develop, but a solid project cannot afford to decrease its price by 70 percent from the token sale level. It is unacceptable for the most investors and I cannot blame them for complains after such results.

It is a question of psychology if you want to gain or if you wish to lose. The current problem is the lack of education, because a lot of newbies see a trader that makes 100 percent per months, trying to do the same, fail and lose all their money.

I am sure in only one thing,  that sooner or later crypto will get bullish and we would finally come back to the top. Right now, I know nothing and only believe in my investment choices, but I am not sure in any of them.

A coin needs be listed on a good exchange to provide a solid trading volume for a good pump. If a coin is listed on Probit, even the bullish trend won't help it to raise in price. Exchanges are doing all the job for a coin pump.

Without any doubt, crypto was created for free market, but don't you think that if almost  every second project that goes live scams people, it is time to think about how we can create a safer place for investors and new people that are interested in crypto?

I cannot get why there are so much centralised coins from all over the world want to get into crypto. Facebook with its Libra, China with its digital Yuan and Binance is doing the same. As far as, I know the community does not support such coins at all.

Trading competition is a good way to promote your coin, but I think they are mostly unfair. If a guy has 100 BTC, he can win almost every single competition just buy doing 2-3 trades and it does not matter on what exchange he does that.

Surely, but the problem is the lack of those working products. If every single coin or token that is listed on coinmarketcap, would have its own working product, BTC would not cost 10k and the market cap would be much higher than a trillion USD.

There are several things that could have happened to your wallet. The reason why you can receive free coins, is bounty campaign that paid in EOS or staking rewards that you are getting for holding EOS. But a more realistic scenario is that somebody has access to your wallet through private key or seed phrase. I would recommend to withdrawal everything you have and create another wallet.

This is not surprising, because as we are moving towards the mass adoption, there is only one way to find a common road with government and this is ban of all privacy coins. No government will legalise crypto currencies with such coins as Monero.

I had some issues two days ago as well. I do not know what the hell was going on with ETH network, but I tried to send some coins and it took ages to confirm. Have lost a lot of gas as well, but it seems working good now.

If a bounty has more than 2000 participants in each campaign, stake based bounties are making no sense anymore, because everybody would get a tiny bit of tokens. In such cases fixed allocation with limited participation is much better.

ICNQ looks great, they have burned a half of their total supply, but they need to push cash into marketing and better exchanges, because almost nobody knows about this coin. Btw, the total supply is 10 million ICNQ tokens.

Honestly, I do not know projects that did IEO on exchanges like Probit and made profit. They may have collected some funds, if it was not manipulated, but the chance of success of such an IEO is around 0,1 percent.

A lot of projects are doing things exactly in the same oder and the problem is that it is very difficult to detect such a project from the very beginning. If funds collection goes well, team is doing their work, developing product without any sign of a scam and stop operating within the next several months.

Unfortunately, ETH is doing bad science 2017, because there are no updates on the network. ETH is a good coin, but if Vitalik wants to make it bigger than BTC, their team need to work on marketing and development speed.