⧉ Ignore the Negative Trust Rating, it's false, made by ☠ DarkStar_ ☠
I posted proof and toll my story, posted TX id of buying script..
No one has been deceived.
Please read my proof https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1732739Thanks friends!
Good luck and more wins!Contest ends on 15 January 2017 23:59 GMT Join and win! Good luck friends!
|
|
|
|
Accepted! Good luck and more wins! |
|
|
|
IMO, you should stop gambling on dice sites because I think that almost all dice sites are rigged and are there just to rip off your coins from your account. Whether you gamble at 50% or 1% or 99%, luck will never favor you and house will eventually take everything.
Yes, many dice sites use fake seed and have full control provably fair system, they can make to lose easy.. and players lost all money. playing on dice - result is one - lost all money In fact, this effect is achieved through quick search methods for collision hash functions developed in 2004-2006. If one does not know the collision are two different sets of data having the same hash value. So, in 2004, a group of Chinese researchers developed an algorithm based on differential cryptanalysis, which allows for a relatively short time to find two different random data block size of 128 bytes each, having the same md5 sum. Although this algorithm at one time produced the effect of a bomb of his performance left much to be desired. But already in 2006 Czech cryptographer Vlastimil Klima offered to search for a new collision method to find a couple of different random 128 byte blocks one md5 sum of a personal computer less than a minute. it's possible for md5, sha256, sha512 I do not blame any dice sites. |
|
|
|
I just do not understand the main, essential point - the seventh round is already started or not yet ? I see that many already do retweets , however, the start of the round 7 is announced is not crazybtrade ? ...  round 7 start now. tweet https://twitter.com/crazybtrade/status/819728483475714048Thanks! |
|
|
|
received 0.00584btc but why not 0.006btc because my bet 0.003btc? Win=bet X 1.98 fees 0.0001 0.003 x 1.98 - 0.0001 = 0.00584 Thanks |
|
|
|
That's called "hash collisions". Dice sites always use SHA-2 to hash their serverseeds. SHA-2 has no known hash collisions.
Note: if it were that easy to make collision attacks on SHA-2, dice sites would be the least of your worries. Governments, bitcoin, the Internet, banks, etc. would all have a huge problem.
edit: you are talking about MD5. Dice sites do not and should never use MD5 indeed.
you can find for sha-256 and 512 Good luck to your site. |
|
|
|
I have to assume this is a troll at this point. Is there a way to contact the admins to have his threads (he has like 5 of them in G&R) deleted since he has circumstantial evidence of being a historic thief and has literally admitted to stealing from a user currently?
troll? I think you are troll.. We paid all winnings and contests and have proof! I'm not scammer! |
|
|
|
The whole idea of the provably fair method that dice sites use, is that you get a HASH of the serverseed BEFORE you bet. Therefor you can verify (= provable) if that hash is still the same after the serverseed is revealed.
If the site changes the seed (what you call "fake seed"), the player is able to detect this, because the HASH would be different. Therefor he can prove that he was cheated (or if he was not cheated.) This is provably fair.
On your game, there is no way for the player to know if that specific timestamp is correct. Therefor that is not provably fair.
PS, you look more idiotic with every post you make, so I don't think this is helping much for your reputation as a gambling site owner.
Really? Yes, hash before bet but he use another string and will be equal! But result will be different.. In fact, this effect is achieved through quick search methods for collision hash functions developed in 2004-2006. If one does not know the collision are two different sets of data having the same hash value. So, in 2004, a group of Chinese researchers developed an algorithm based on differential cryptanalysis, which allows for a relatively short time to find two different random data block size of 128 bytes each, having the same md5 sum. Although this algorithm at one time produced the effect of a bomb of his performance left much to be desired. But already in 2006 Czech cryptographer Vlastimil Klima offered to search for a new collision method to find a couple of different random 128 byte blocks one md5 sum of a personal computer less than a minute. it's possible for md5, sha256, sha512 sorry for bad english  |
|
|
|
You write about provably fair https://dicesites.com/provably-fairYou mislead people because many dice sites use fake seed and have full control provably fair system, they can make to lose easy.. and players lost all money. playing on dice - result is one - lost all money Would you mind to prove that there are many dice sites using fake seed? Saying is easy but without proper proof then it is useless. You said this just because NLNico have a proof that your game is not provably fair, then you try to misslead people about provably fair system. no, NLNico said about my game, but not said about provably faid system of dice. notice: I do not blame dice sites. |
|
|
|
You write about provably fair https://dicesites.com/provably-fairYou mislead people because many dice sites use fake seed and have full control provably fair system, they can make to lose easy.. and players lost all money. playing on dice - result is one - lost all money |
|
|
|
Lol?
No, I am saying many times now that you cannot use timestamp in a provably fair calculation. What has that to do with BTCC? Did you read my message here or just ignored it?
In addition, I am sure that BTC/CNY price is just as well unreliable and unverifiable because there is no clear public history of 1 specific price per timestamp - this has nothing to with the reputation of BTCC. But I am not even talking about that here.
Appreciate the effort, but you're wasting your time, I doubt crazybtrade will get any of it.
I've been keeping quiet here for a long time, but let me state a few things. You're in no way abled to operate a gambling site. You lack basic skills like integrity, honesty, aswell as knowledge about bitcoin and other things. Further, you're ignorant. And that's your biggest problem. Just look at this thread, look at all the things brought up (your connection to RollinCoin, the not processed bets, the provably fair problem). You were not abled to respond to any of it in a statisfying way. You've had more than just one person trying to explain you how things are not the way you presented them, but you've been sticking to your sick, wrong, imagination of things. My negative trust on your account is final and won't be removed. I think nobody should trust you with a single satoshi. Regardless if you are indeed RollinCoin, regardless if you refund the player you screwed over, regardless if you change your wrong advertising claims. I do not deserve red trust.. i don't know who is rollincoin before this thread.. I'm not scammer, no one has been scammed. all winnings and contests paid! I have proof but all ignore it. please clear my red trust |
|
|
|
Lol?
No, I am saying many times now that you cannot use timestamp in a provably fair calculation. What has that to do with BTCC? Did you read my message here or just ignored it?
In addition, I am sure that BTC/CNY price is just as well unreliable and unverifiable because there is no clear public history of 1 specific price per timestamp - this has nothing to with the reputation of BTCC. But I am not even talking about that here.
I can't change timestamp.. i get it from api BTCC. You have dice listing.. dice site can make fake seed for scam but you don't post about it. strange... You write about provably fair https://dicesites.com/provably-fairYou mislead people because many dice sites use fake seed and have full control provably fair system, they can make to lose easy.. and players lost all money. playing on dice - result is one - lost all money hash before bet but he use another string and will be equal! But result will be different.. In fact, this effect is achieved through quick search methods for collision hash functions developed in 2004-2006. If one does not know the collision are two different sets of data having the same hash value. So, in 2004, a group of Chinese researchers developed an algorithm based on differential cryptanalysis, which allows for a relatively short time to find two different random data block size of 128 bytes each, having the same md5 sum. Although this algorithm at one time produced the effect of a bomb of his performance left much to be desired. But already in 2006 Czech cryptographer Vlastimil Klima offered to search for a new collision method to find a couple of different random 128 byte blocks one md5 sum of a personal computer less than a minute. it's possible for md5, sha256, sha521 |
|
|
|
about provably fair:
bitcoin game with Provably fair! Your game is not provably fair. I could copy your game and generate a losing result for the player 100% of the time while it would still "verify" according to your method. I can do this by simply using a slightly different time, because there is NO fixed time on a transaction. I have explained this multiple times now: You cannot use timestamps if you want to be provably fair. There is no fixed timestamp at bitcoin transactions. There can be a 0 - 10 second delay EASILY between when a bitcoin node gets the transaction. You could maliciously change the timestamp to 1,2,3,4.. seconds later to make the player lose. There is no way for the player to verify if you did this. Therefor it's impossible to generate a provably fair outcome with this. I am not saying you are a scam. I am also not saying that you are cheating. I could believe that you are honest. But provably fair is not about believing or trusting.
Provably fair is a way for the players to verify and prove if they have been cheated or not. On your site, they cannot verify and prove this, because using "timestamp" is unreliable as shown in my previous posts. Therefor the player just has to trust you to be fair.
That is "trust us, we are fair" and not "provably (=you can prove we are) fair".
And in more detail starting from: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1666167.msg17188778#msg17188778Since you continue to ignore me and claim that this game is provably fair (while it really is NOT provably fair AT ALL), I will add negative trust too. Your game doesn't have to be provably fair, but if it's not, you should not promote it as provably fair. you said that famous exchange BTCC price BTC/CNY is not provably fair.. please contact, they explain you +1 888 518 2822 |
|
|
|
Notice : Do not send your money from any online wallet , we only accept Blockchain wallet. What are you saying  why you can't accept bitcoin from other wallets, this shows how much knowledge you have on how bitcoin actually works  When the timer ends , our site’s algorithm will generate three random numbers. If these numbers matches with the last
two number of your TX-ID then you are the winner.
Which algorithm you will be using? And how we can be sure that you will not select your own bitcoin address as lottery winner  I think it is because they would be sending back the prize to the same wallet. So if someone wins and that person used an online wallet and sends bitcoins using that online wallet for sure the address would be an address he has no control off. Unlike if he is using, for example, electrum wallet to send the btc. When he wins, the site send the money back to his addy he used to send. I know players can't use coinbase, xapo, exchange wallet.. but can use blockchain-info |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
