Nope. You yourself said that there were staking blocks being generated and that there were no issues. The network weight was 0 and the difficulty was 0.02.
You say none of this is true, but how come nobody in the discord received any rewards for three days, and you only decided to fix the explorer after you were receiving conflicted blocks?
Please, explain how the truth is FUD. I have a screenshot of you being a specially named L5 on CryptoHub, too. Laughing as your coin dropped in value, interestingly enough. Does "Hahaha" sound familiar as your only chat post today?
Just admit there was an issue with the block explorer and be the developer you claim you are, dude. Stop trying to play the community for fools so you can get an easy cash out that you don't deserve.
Oh, and you removed the "community manager" for not cooperating with the team? You mean literally telling you there was an issue when you refused to look and see it for yourself?
You aren't the team. You're barely a developer. You can copy/paste code from two different projects and change the names. Oh boy.
You can also ban someone that donated their time to helping your community while they had cancer, because they voiced a concern about the staking not working for 3 days prior. That was all the discord was talking about that whole time.
Please explain to the class how taking the explorer offline externally for those 3 days, while setting your client-side computer clock forward an hour will show up in code. Go on. I'm waiting.
It's sad that a project with such potential is run this way.
"there were staking blocks being generated" === no issue
"network weight was 0 and the difficulty was 0.02" ---- what's the issue?
"specially named L5 on CryptoHub" === upgraded my account with all upgrade options, anyone can do this
"there was an issue with the block explorer" ---- there was not an issue with the block explorer. it showed the correct information at all times
"You mean literally telling you there was an issue when you refused to look and see it for yourself?" === wrong information, as she was wrong. there was no issue
"You can also ban someone that donated their time to helping your community while they had cancer, because they voiced a concern about the staking not working for 3 days prior. That was all the discord was talking about that whole time." ---- i can and will ban anyone fudding the project with misinformed or just plain wrong info. health issues are not my concern, as i have my own. this is not a pitty party.
"
Please explain to the class how taking the explorer offline externally for those 3 days, while setting your client-side computer clock forward an hour will show up in code. Go on. I'm waiting." ---- ummmm.... huh? do YOU even know what you are talking about?
Now you have had all of my time you will get. Have a good one!
Show Posts
