@gsrcrxsi314
How about pumping water up and the placing several turbines downstream? Lets say several = infinite.
|
|
|
This is the best thread ever! xD
Why the discussion has stopped?!
Btw, obvious improvement is missing - u input 500W and get 2kw, why not short-curcuit the whole thing? Feed the motor not from the grid but from the output. This way u will still get 1.5kW output and no need for the grid AC!
And finally perpetuum mobile is achieved. Btw, conservation of energy is emprirical law, isn't it? Should not be that hard to break ; )
|
|
|
Secondly, you spamming the hardware section
Also he is spamming my email constantly.
|
|
|
Hey OgNasty,
I'm in need of your services and I wanted to PM you to discuss an upcoming escrow. However, being limited to two PM's per day, I'm out.
Is there any other way to contact you to discuss the details?
Nope. Sorry. I would recommend that users experiencing issues with PM limits look into paying the reasonable fee to become a Copper Member here. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2385104.0Paying to increase PM limit that's fucked up.. stakepools.io, feel free to contact me via skype, I will relay your messages to OgNasty here for free ; )
|
|
|
Nothing to do except getting back to Windows 7 or Linux in order to keep mining Ethereum until April 2019 when DAG will reach officially 3 GB in size.
Or Win 8.1 / 2012 R2 Btw, max epoch I could reach on Server 2008 - 231, 2012 R2 - 230. Friend of mine tried *nix(EthOS I think) - 230 max. Server 2019 - same as Win10. Killing DWM and explorer or Core(no GUI) install does not help. So not April, but Jan prly.
|
|
|
hello i try to install windows 10 and immediately run claymore with out update windows 10 and same problem if we return to windows 7 how we can run 6 gpus or more ? ppl say, that only W10(not W10 per ce but WDDM 2.x) has this limitation(reserved and unusable vRAM). So prly W8.1 will work. Also we checked and 8x1060 work fine on W7. But you have to to this - https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/738070/cuda-setup-and-installation/8x-gpu-gtx-issue-under-windows/However, for some reason DualMiner was crashing with 8xGPU. Two instances worked tho. Also Quadro/Tesla owners can use TCC mode.
|
|
|
Anyone having similar problems or lack of problems running windows server 2016?
Windows Server 2016 with all current updates works fine.
|
|
|
Hello, trying to mod and get warning: 2018.03.17 13:47:13 Warning - Multiple Catalyst_Version values were found: "" 2018.03.17 13:47:13 Warning - This may indicate problem with the drivers or registry or that system is not supported 2018.03.17 13:47:13 Warning - I will now stop, use Force to mod anyway at your own risk! Should I install old 16.1.1 version? No idea. It's just a warning anyway. Tick 'Force' and proceed. Typically Catalyst_Version registry key is present for every AMD GPU in the system. If values don't match - it's weird, they should match. In your case, looks like it's empty. Probably because new drivers don't have Catalyst at all. However, mod stopped working when RX video cards came out. And Win10 supports 6xGPUs out of the box..
|
|
|
I have 6 RX-580's. 4 have 8gb mem and 2 have 4gb mem.
4 run between 30 and 31 mh/s 2 run between 29 and 30 mh/s
They 2 Gigabyte, 2 ASUS, 1 PowerColor, 1 Sapphire PULSE
Memory varies between Samsung and Hynix
Hynix @ 29-30, awesome! I think mine Hynix make 28-29. I'll annoy you via pm for the timings later ; )
|
|
|
OK. I should have never posted any of my comments whatsoever about the kernel debacle. I know nothing about it.
As for the kernels.. I can give a flying fuck who stole from whom. And I myself will use the most profitable miner. As soon as temp stop appears.. well.. Not to mention that Claymore nVidia hashing speed is basically the same as open-source ethminer. And at one point it was even lower. When some dude boosted 1060 open source, but it took Claymore some time to implement(copy open-source kernel) boost into his miner. But, with all that said, I rly don't like ppl stealing. And profiting from it. So the only thing I can do is write to this thread ; )
|
|
|
For some reason "On My rigs" Phoenix is faster. ( not a lot ) but still faster.
Btw, what's ur rigs? I tested on mostly 1060 3GB with only two RX Polaris based. Mostly AM3 based, so very very weak CPU.
|
|
|
Let me sum it up. You tested for a day ? Wow, that a lot of testing. Why not 5 minutes, you would have saved time and gotten about the same results. The PhoenixMiner is faster. I know. I've proved it many many times comparing to Claytmore. I've tested for over a month running both miners. I know, you don't.
I don't know anything about who's Kernels belong to who and I seriously doubt you do either.
But I do, I've dumped both kernels and they are virtually the same. Like almost the same. Almost - some labels named differently for example, but when you disassemble, labels always look funky. Also I did test Phoenix vs Claymore for more than a day ; ) Two days actually ; ) But on 10x 6xGPU rigs. Same hashrate. But fee on Phoenix is lower.. so it's actually no brainer which miner to use ; ) Except I can't use Phoenix, cause temp stop option is not present.
|
|
|
screenshots or gtfo
I choose gtfo, so infectedmushi, gtfo.
|
|
|
If in fact they are one in the same...
The OpenCL kernels are the same. Why is phoenix miner developmentally so behind Claymore? (OC stuff, Dual mine options, etc)
If one was just going to rip off claymore's work... Just rip it all off?
Because all miners work like this - miner asks pool what to do, miner tells GPU what to do, GPU does it, miner replies to the pool. To tell GPU what to do you need to use different programming language. In fact its even a different program. So the miner actually consists of two programs - one which deals with pool etc and another one which deals with the GPU. Actually it's even more complicated if we do overclocking and monitoring. But. Nothing matters more than that OpenCL kernel - this actually determines how big your hashrate will be. Everyone can write overclocking/monitoring/pool interaction, but only handfull of people can implement OpenCL kernels, I do speak of "normal"(fast) OCL kernels, not some open source stuff you can find around the web. And then why is phoenix (in my opinion) faster and more stable?
No idea. For me Claymore is stable. I don't know how stability can be more or less. It's just stable. I would hate to be using a miner that was ripped off of claymore's. Competition is good, but not at this cost.
It's not the competion if we steal something and sell it for less.
|
|
|
I will create step-by-step guide how to confirm that you send my kernels to GPU and you will say that your miner uses "old unknown" kernels because it detects dumping but still mines at the same speed. That's funny answer, but you don't have better one, I understand. So my word against yours. The result is obvious for me, however, since I call you a liar, anyone who wants to confirm by yourself that this miner uses my kernels can PM me and I will send step-by-step guide how to do it, then you can say the results; no newbies please, be at least sr.member on this forum, just to be sure that you don't want to become another "phoenixminer" and spend my time again...
I did dumped both kernels and dissasmed them. Using Claymore guide. I also checked source of the injector, hard-coding dll.dll and changing linker out.. cmon man : D Injector does get the kernel loaded by the miner, no tricks there. It's exactly like Claymore says - PhoenixMiner 2.6 kernel is virtually the same as Claymore 10.6 DualMiner kernel.
|
|
|
Ok, ur mum is 75. Average age women became pregnant in Switzerland is 30.20. Which makes you 45 yrs old. So 1973 it is ; )
Haha! Classic. I was actually born in South Africa... ; )) well.. imo guessing is useless. But reading all ur posts and trying to find info on the web and making some educated guess.. pretty useless also, but statistically is much more "lucky" ; )
|
|
|
Ok, ur mum is 75. Average age women became pregnant in Switzerland is 30.20. Which makes you 45 yrs old. So 1973 it is ; )
|
|
|
It seems Finsky has gone mia, no posts since july?
Who is selling this stuff now? I have the psu, but trying to get a 4k breakout board and cables..
Optimizer user on this forum. 50$ per 2KW board. Want to sell ur PSUs to me? ; )
|
|
|
|