Guys here is a proof where yahoo says that he sold the account pokerowned  : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790913.msg17857864#msg17857864

While checking the seclogs its found that he never changed pass during that time, so how the hell he sold the account ?

Proof of yahoo connected with pokerowned : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17067577#msg17067577

sc : http://prntscr.com/e8xsu7


Self escrow : First made an announcement here about " yahoo will manage our camp as if yahoo and pokerowned are two different person.

here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1541701.msg15499719#msg15499719

While then held the funds for "himsself" ( since yahoo is a team member of CJ " : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1542673.msg15510567#msg15510567

I hope this time you guys don't have any poor excuses to save him man !

Well, see this

Just check this user : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=542429

Made from starting to just sell and buy accounts ( mainly sell )

and hence a potential serious signature spammer, and where are those guys who tag account sellers ?

Basically because its a trusted member selling/buying accounts brutally you allow him ?


And yes , an auction which was abandoned without any information and this is quite rubbish.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1150562.msg12133013#msg12133013

To lauda : you give -ve trust to people for selling accounts and encouraging members to earn from sigs from multiple accounts ( see : http://prntscr.com/e8j4uf ) and yourself working with a brutal account seller dude ?

So basically after 100 years suddenly when LAUDA's trust got negative .. suddenly Vod gave him +ve feedback ?
Well, I think I am done with this forum where Vod, lauda and 100+ accounts are controlled by a single person.

Bye guys, enjoy this forum. And please dont make a trust system if you cant follow it.

When a user Lauda ( cool meaning in language Hindi actually ) clearly done something that was much more brutal and illegal than what QS did then why Lauda just got 1 -ve while QS has tons of that ?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0

Any particular reason why such hate with some members or are lauda and 90% of green trust members alt of each other ?

Please define !

Hello guys here is the full story below

First of introduction to girlbtc : GirlBTC is a scammer and rightly been banned because he scammed, tortured, scammed, blackmailed, withold money of other users, gave death threats.

After this girlbtc opened a new forum to promote their scam site and take rivalry from bitcointalk owner theymos : http://girlbtc.com/bitcoinforum/index.php


Yahoo supporting the forum and promoting it and admitting he is gimli on girlbtc : http://prntscr.com/dwbrvm

And here is the proof of yahoo62278 himself admitting that he applied for moderator :


Yahoo moderated forum for some time and then the owner did not paid him and then he left.


The question here arises is : Such a person who knowingly promotes/supports a scam can even sell positive trust for money and this cannot be denied. Hence a serious threat since he is in the default trust and even is a member of SMAS and can ban innocent people because he might want to promote his own accounts.

Lauda says : Supporting a scam or even scamming is fine unless its done out of this forum, if so why we gave escrow-ms negative feedback ? He scammed out of the forum


So basically as yahoo supported a scam site and hence deserves a ban.

Lauds said this : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1753779.msg17516472#msg17516472


Here Lauda says that anyone promoting copycat forum - girlbtc deserves to get banned !

and now yahoo62278 has been promoting that forum in fact moderating it, which obviously means that he is promoting them should he be banned now ?

here is the post yahoo62278 admitted he works for girlbtc and applied for moderator : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1751707.msg17498756#msg17498756

( check the first 2 lines, he admitted he is a mod there and anyone who wants to check his profile, here it is - http://girlbtc.com/bitcoinforum/index.php?action=profile;u=90 )

Guys ar the rules different for higher ranked members while for lower ranked members they are different ?

In a post here :



yahoo said that we should not just concern for money.



Ok looks good, now check this : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1751707.0

Here yahoo clearly admitted that he is working for girlbtc as a moderator there and that he is just doing for money !

Basically guys girlbtc is a serial scammer here who not just scammed a lot of guys, copied the work of others, rather he even gave death threats and tried to evade ban.

Now if yahoo can work for such a person JUST FOR MONEY ... then how can he ban users for earning money by doing posts ( which in fact isnt wrong  too ! )

Really ? Our main concern should not be earning money ? Well you joined a scammer's forum and his group and even became a moderator there for just money and you admitted it publicly. So when you can work for just money, can't others do the same ?

reference : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1751707.0

Yahoo himself is working for a scam forum ( girlbtc whose admin scammed tons of members here then gave death threats to others and finally tried to evade the ban)

So is it that only you are allowed to work for money while others are not ?


Yahoo joined a scammer in his new mission himself and publicly accepted it, and he clearly said he does that to earn money !

Also QS check his post history he hardly makes 20 posts in a week and you calling him a spammer ?

I remember some users keep yelling use escrow .. so these are practices and actually should be encouraged.

First of all, I made this new account because I am worried he might red tag me. So anyways

One request : If you don't have a valid argument please don't give me advice or insult me or anyone.

Below are the reasons why I believe he should not be a DT Member in accordance with priority.

Reason 1 ( Maximum Priority )


The member girlbtc ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=458172 ) made more than 3-5 accounts , gave death threats to users and even blackmailed a user before paying him. Now all this leads to him being banned and even after his attempts of ban evasion, our talented DT members like Lutpin banned him immediately ( or anyhow they got banned )

Now the story doesn't end here, they opened a forum of their own. see here : http://girlbtc.com/bitcoinforum/index.php

The basic aim is to show btctalk down and slam us, anyways doesn't bother anyone right ?

Now the funny part is that Yahoo62278 ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355846) applied for a moderator there, even when he knows that the owner girlbtc is copying posts from here and pasting them in their own forum ( though they mention credit to the poster )

Why would you want to become a moderator on forum whose owner has such a cruel and horrible history and lately has been copying posts and in more than 50 instances they have been insulting btctalk.

The reason behind yahoo applying for mod there is because he is GETTING PAID FOR BEING A MOD !

There is a public group of girlbtc where anyone can join and check what I am saying.

So in short Yahoo62278 believes that if he is getting paid at other forum he would happily join there knowing they have a rivalry with btctalk and often insulting btctalk moreover had a very terrible behavior in this forum as they gave death threats and countless ban evasions.

Does such a guy deserve to be in Default trust ? You guys decide.

USERNAME OF YAHOO ON GIRLBTC FORUM : Gimli



Reason 2 ( Lesser priority )

Usually we expect the DT members to have a at least calm nature and not very aggressive and at least we expect them to obey the rules set by administrator, right ?

Now see this trust given by yahoo to bapparabi : http://prntscr.com/dvdffl

There is a clear rule that users must not be given trust based on their posting. And spamming isn't really scamming and trust reflects scam nature not spam, right ?

Moreover a calm DT member would have simply asked via PM to cool down a bit and that't it, did yahoo ever messaged bapparabi like that ?