Thanks; but, for what I'm wanting to do, that's lacking too. The XML is stripped down and doesn't have "Points Last 24hr" which is integral to a valid estimate (a backwards looking average is 23M points different than past 24 hours on eoc and ~ 20M different than the "Pool Folding@home rate" number on cbp).

Basically I want someone new, and considering joining CC team, to type in their estimated PPD number (and nothing more) and have as close to a valid estimate of earnings as possible. They can then tweak settings to get larger range estimates, but accurate simplicity first.

With at least 1 more 1080 Ti being added today.

I hope, ffs, that it isn't the same folks that have been "working on" FoldingCoin.  

If my memory is good:

• CC2.0 will be the new coin (quantum computing safe, without PoW) that will be distributed for Folding
• SigmaX is a new coin, (quantum computing safe, with PoW), and its distribution would be (probably among others) related to holding (i.e. not dumping) CURE

But this was the idea over one year ago. Since then it might have evolved to take into account new ideas the Devs had (Proof of Proof etc.).

Agreed, CureCoin is literally the difference between me folding and mining some random dumpcoin.

Actually, unless things have changed, there were supposed to be 2 different coins: CC2.0 which would replace CC1.0 and remove SHA256D PoW and SigmaX which would keep the PoW.

I'm not "upset" about any such thing. If I were to use the word upset, I'd say that I find it upsetting that the OP is fallacious in the depiction of the "participation" role that ASICs can play in CureCoin.
Most specifically if there hasn't been any block in 40 minutes and the next block is PoS, and PoS difficulty is cut in half, it will still increase the PoW difficulty (which is only lowered by a long PoW block average time, not overall average block time of the network).

Sure, CureCoin is THE Braggingcoin

BTW - for some of us (those who hold their CURE) it's not "Quadruple Payout" it's Quintuple as the future SigmaX coin will be distributed as a reward for holding CURE (if I remember well).

While I appreciate the offer, I'm not a big fan of taking public things private or private things public.

My "issues"/concerns are but limited to four:

1) The statement of:
is, at best misleading.
   a) Someone that is "heavily-invested in ASIC equipment" not going to fair well pointing that equipment at CureCoin,
   b) they're literally looked down upon for doing so. I use this morning's      as a reference, because I'm too lazy to look up the other 2 or 3 times he's basically said the same thing.

2) There's no known activity on the part of devs to make CureCoin useful to purchase folding equipment. Making the primary purpose of the coin appear to be nothing more than dumping coins on altruistic buyers.

3) Through a willful act, or ignorance of code, PoS blocks increase the diff for PoW blocks (even when PoS diff goes down), creating 1a.

4) Being treated like a moronic child for pointing out that 1-3 are actual issues.

While I appreciate the offer, I'm not a big fan of taking public things private or private things public.

Well don't trust CURECOIN with your money if you like it....


don't get burned. So many lost money on this shitshow and now they have to seek a cure for their depression.

Despite the good 'idea', too many fundamentals are not present. You are 'folding' for a bitch that get it for free. Miners dumps at every occasion, or hold in despair. Large hand pump to make some FOMO bagholders  thats don't even read past the coin nickname, just to dump harder. No big fish will buy something that the 'consumer' dont need to buy WITH MONEY.

Who are you folding for already?

Get a reality check CURECOIN.

I think by sticking only to one area we are limiting scope and growth

If you want to become the powerhouse of distributed computing we need to allow people to dedicate their resources on array of projects that they find worthwhile, interesting or even profitable.

So all those wanting to just go with "curing" can still do that but we allow others to join the project too.

Then again volksholk was saying there is a companion coin coming so perhaps that is what that is for, other things not related directly to curing.

I read this on the grid thread - im far more invested into cure coin since the start but I think folding at home is too restrictive

-------------------------------------------
Golem, which is also targeting distributed computing segment, still has marketcap ~14x higher than Gridcoin, despite having less functionality (just a distributing rendering prototype vs fully functional general-purpose BOINC computing platform used by Gridcoin). So yes, I would say there's plenty of room for further growth. The future is in monetized and commercial BOINC projects which will distribute Gridcoin to their crunchers, obtaining a lot of computing power at very affordable prices.
----------------------------------------------

BOINC and anything else that can facilitate distributed computing

folding at home is great but I think the poster on the grc thread and those voting with their btc are pushing more open ended distributed computing projects.

Would be good to see cure looking far into the future too.


Also i'm interested in the cure dev team

is vorksholk still involved and it seems some new devs are here now too?

is cure coin always going to be tied to folding at home?

what about opening up the possibility for other distributed computing tasks?

That sound very promising.
Hopefully we will make poloniex regret booting cure coin and keeping on grid and folding.

A cure coin exchange could be something worth looking at in the future too or getting added to blocknet