First of all, it is a pleasure that you post in this forum, I follow you in the DASH forum and your contributions are of great interest, well-intentioned and always looking for improvements, imo. The point is that what is being raised is just another dissimulation about the corpse of the REAL DASH community that the Mnodes robbed and expelled from the project. Without real decentralization, anyway, I don't understand any improvement.

The model is not "a kind of centralization" ... it is centralization, absolute and outright ... in fact, DASH is more like future CBDCs than the libertarian cryptos that forged this space. Instead of being manipulated by politicians, it is done by another small group, nothing more ... but the model is identical: It will be the currency that 300 guys want (or less, it depends on who owns that 80% of Mnodes that until now do not vote ... maybe those who have done so until now should not worry about it anymore) . A global project in the hands of 2 or 300 people, infinitely less than any shareholder of a company. ... There are almost one million four hundred thousand addresses in DASH. The relationship is better not even considering it ... it would be ridiculous.

An endogamous solution of "voting for that elite" only wants to wash the face of a centralized project ... it does not seek honest synergies or decentralization. DASH was looking for that ... those who hijacked the project were not ... quite the opposite.

Now the DASH "community" can vote for their leaders ... is that it? An ally of a decentralized project does not seek the generosity or condescension of anyone. Seeks synergy and a respectful return to your participation. Generate a huge collective force outside of authority and take advantage of it, nothing more. Although the worst thing is not the scam committed ... but the beautiful original project will not be able to be enjoyed by anyone.

Well, for that, it wouldn't hurt to wash your face alone. I hope that the "market" pays for that commercial proposal as it deserves, that is, commercially.

By the way ... it is totally logical that the "outsiders" think that and more if they are supporters of crypto and know the movement / sector, etc ...... but personally, this is my fifth year in DASH and I think the same . And anyone would do it without DASH's fallacious "community" narrative. The DASH community is a couple of hundred people. What anyone understands by community in crypto, people integrated in the project, by investment, conceptual empathy, collective growth , etc ... does not exist in DASH. They are CLIENTS of an elite that monopolizes the rights and benefits of it. Personally, I don't consider myself a foreigner ... or a "user" of DASH. In fact, I never configured my Mnodes for not collaborating in a hoax. Making money with direct lies, euphemisms or self-serving half-truths is not my thing, I have never done it and I never will ... especially because four too smart guys have come up with it and take on that role. DASH was my favorite project to compete against BTC, which is already impossible to do due to the centralization of DASH ... Anyway, I have made very good money with other projects, I do not need to assume fallacies, or deceive anyone for it. That is precisely why I am in crypto, to avoid the fantastic stories of political smoke sellers who want to take advantage of others ... what I needed to get here to assume it...what a joke !

People who watch Netflix at home are not "the Netflix community" ... that's cheap demagoguery to camouflage an unacceptable manipulation in the crypto world ... and more with "libertarian" statements about being your own bank, etc (For true ... Duffield already exposed it from the beginning with the "remunerated accounts" for micro-holders - Shared Mnodes - of DASH ... but the people all over the world who believed him lost their money and any right or capacity of integration in DASH ... and buying tokens for thousands of dollars). Even if you tried a "popular" poll on Netflix, the community would still not exist. Netflix users don't give a shit how they run that company, just like a telephony server or an electricity provider ... they are CUSTOMERS: They pay for a service, they want to receive it, and finish. But clients neither run Netflix nor support the work of its executives. The DASH elite choose this profile for those who need to be more modestly involved in the project ... but without integrating them. And they will receive the same ... at best.

Worst of all for DASH is that it will offer services that other projects do integrate into a collective and decentralized movement, without elitist manipulations. To begin with, these projects will respond respectfully, proportionally and in accordance with the purchasing power of each ally committed to the project based on their purchasing power and time of incorporation into the project ... which is absolutely logical and the DASH hijackers prevent all Costa, with the aggravating circumstance of having announced it to the whole world years ago, keeping their money and then marginalizing them. So those who want to get into crypto, join the "free money" revolution, without being controlled by 10,000 politicians or 300 too smart kids ... they will join another project that recognizes, respects, integrates and rewards them, even if their shipments take another minute. And they will commit to those projects like with their basketball or soccer team ... with devotion ... and with the added bonus as well as risking their money.

DASH will never have that. Those who kidnapped the jewel raised by its founder have chosen it that way. An endogamous approach intended to "enjoy" the generosity of an elite is not a collective or decentralized approach. That elite tries to mitigate the consequences of their deception cosmetically, because the appearance, in the context of the crypto revolution, is simply shameful and unacceptable ... but without giving up the benefits of the centralized project, of course.

In any case, the actual decentralization of the project is not an act of generosity, but of survival. The more atomized the governance, the less risk of control there is by large holders of tokens ... or groups of them. You will have to live with it ... indeed, I presume that in a voting niche where 4000 out of 5000 have not yet "shown the leg", - 5000 devices, not people, many with tens or hundreds of votes...that even that "decentralization in 5000 Mnodes" is used fallaciously -  the modest Mnodes will suffer the consequences.

 Personally, I will not suffer. Without a conceptual fork to recover the original project, unfortunately, in DASH , I'm just waiting for a good trade..., like so many other people .

YUM, YUM ...

Only exposure to BTC nullifies Nakamoto's Cannibalism.

Oops! Sorry ... I'm not a hijacker of the Dao and the thinking heads of DASH will be deliberating to guide the world with how a Store of value is defined.

Anyway ... you'll tell "... Eagerly waiting to be Enlightened ... and Educated ...! "




(BTC will do it EVERYTIME ...he has been totally ignored while he grew up like a giant. You were so busy handing out the millionaire cake and betraying and marginalizing the REAL DASH community !   ... you guys keep looting the DAO for "tips between friends" ... Perfect hit, bro!)      




P.S. on the contrary, it is the opportunity to regain ground lost in idiocy, lies, centralization, non-compliance or the entire sample of abuse and obscenity that you have allowed yourself ... and be the first to accept the inexcusable Standard of the boss. After the first ... will be crowds. But hey ... anyone expects the slightest gesture of lucidity in this absurdity party of immoral and mediocre?


Well guys ...  this one was just a joke ... the cat playing with the ball...keep your fingers crossed so there won't be a second volley , eating in ten minutes your $ 30 of 2 last months from the ground , the ridiculous reward  to your millions for the toilet and your "savoir faire" since the 2017 moon.

...All the projects were useless ... they were all scams ... they were all "worse than DASH"! ... "The sky is the limit ! " ...What a shame!  

Angry? LOL   

I'm enjoying, you don't know how much, how you yourselves, out of sheer corruption, have sunk your most valuable possession in shit. The bad thing is the damage you have done to others ... which, in addition, you have prevented from enjoying the wonderful project that seduced them years ago.

Everything bad that happens to the Mnodes is little and totally deserved.

---

It's possible. But I always give the benefit of the doubt ... and Duffield's approach, coupled with his insistence on Shared Mnodes, was splendid : respectful and with a vocation for collective collaboration and enrichment. At least in the public exhibitions and aspirations that the founder made of him.

About the thieves who corrupted it, there is no doubt. Fuck themselves ... well and deeply screwed.

Pity is the splendid broken dream for so many people who were stolen and marginalized from even the most elemental expression.

There is a very funny talk on youtube where Duffield expands on his explanations about Instamine / Premine. The calculating RTaylor, after snatching the microphone from him, tries not to return it despite Duffield's insistence ... and literally fixes his gaze so that he does not say a word ... and the other, appeases him with a gesture that - subjective - more it seems typical of the tranquility of someone who has acted without bad faith than that of a trickster who wants to hide the facts ... and he begins to give explanations spontaneously, totally transparent and typical of a daily and domestic matter, absolutely minor for him. Rtaylor, who is literally mortified as Duffield speaks, keeps trying to monopolize the narrative and drive it for closed justifications, which he eventually does.

In that talk, Duffield even gives an altruist solution and openly offered to hand over 80% of his Mnodes to the DAO. Which he obviously hasn't done ... but after his disappearance, what is clear is that Taylor's line of opacity and information programmed to the millimeter, skewed a, usually false and brimming with poisonous political correctness, supported in toxic and  censoship garbage like DASH NEWS  is what he has appropriated from DASH ... with the full acceptance and even imitation of those who have hijacked the DAO. That guy's DASH control is absolute and keeps all the DASH structure in the background that he wants ... and reserves important surprises, I have no doubt about that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EG2km7GAmM&t=2834s

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

BTC is (officially) an attempt to standardize global savings and compete with FOFOA's famous FreeGold that has been working perfectly since the mid-70s. But BTC is a fiat catalyst, nothing more: Real Wealth is already synthesized at the molecular level that is, unsurpassed as a synthesis...and besides, indestructible ... for what it is insurmountable ... and less for a technological system, which is fragile by definition (not its "perfect software approach", but its own structure, composition or format : but it is IMPOSSIBLE to entrust global savings to such a system. This system needs to minimize risk, that is its unique inalienable objective) .The volatility of BTC (actually, another system of drainage such as the one that the DAO hijackers want to carry out for private and elitist benefit in DASH) limits it, moreover, as a Global Savings Standard and a cumulative and progressive Store of Value, but at least it is particularly usable while the party is still on, because the BTC leaks are, at the very least, interactive and decentralized. That's why BTC works ... because every supporter can run that fiat catalyst at his own convenience, whether you're a wall street millionaire shark or a humble bartender in Berlin. As a fiat catalyst, and increase private wealth while the fiat survives , it works.

The underlying problem of DASH is that it does not respect the wealth that is delivered to its structure (and by extension, the individual ownership of that wealth). It is not a store of value because it is emptied for the benefit of a centralized elite. It is too gross a scam as the retards who wanted to kidnap her ... and have killed her. A pity, because Duffield's self-financing system raised resources to fight with solvency against the speculative capital movements of the sector . A part of the "workers" of the DASH structure went beyond their limits, monopolizing them and turned the synergistic system of collective enrichment to which Duffield aspired into the theft of 300 bastards, because he did not contemplate that the legislative structure of DASH would become against the general interest of the project, centralizing rights and benefits and marginalizing the global expansion of the community. He did not think that Mnodes would be the thieving garbage they have proven to be. ... but hey, the fact is that it is already too late to rethink that, possibly.

You're a fucking scammer trying to dupe more victims with more smoke and mirrors

Even if DASH receives wealth, it will be drained ... it is like a raft with 300 holes in the middle of the lake. Neither rowing nor with three racing engines will you reach the shore, because the system is unsustainable. It is an inexpensive perpetual drainage structure for the private benefit of an elite as immoral as it is idiotic. With monstrous capital inflows, theft is concealed for a bit of time, very little ... without them ... the air escapes under pressure like a hurricane and the scam is evident ... in the eyes of all but the your (or that is what you are trying to transmit). Without enriching before a global community ... NOBODY will enrich you. Nothing beyond a couple of speculative pumps proportional to the price of your shitty hijacked coin that ejects value at lightning speed.

How retarded it is necessary to be to try such an approach speaks perfectly of what you are ... and where your arrogant smiles were, believing that you had manipulated everyone , boasting of controlling the project and marginalizing some micro-holders that will never put a dollar in your pockets again.. Do not try to pretend to be "stupid and clueless": Your scam does not work...now, keep fucking yourselves. It is little penalty for the thieves disaster you created.

With proportional returns and , ovbiously, rigths,  for ALL supporters, logical and normal view in a real decentralized collective project ... a currency in a position to operate TODAY a global payments network would have millions of commercial agents around all the world. They now reduce the model to that anyone convinced of the possibilities willing to get involved in DASH has to beg 4 fucking coins from greedy cheats who don't even know what hole they're shitting through...as they go around the world, of course, "educating" people. After having laughed, trolled and despised each of the remaining projects and today pissing these corrupt thieves in the face ... now they have "Education" for the people. In addition to being retarded, arrogant.

Only being a real moron like the guys in this band can ignore it. Better 6% of shit than 3% of a real Treasure , backed and projected. Little more to say to that ... they already show themselves.

What revaluation do you assume for BTC during that 7x of the altcoins?

Thank you.

Well , then ... complain to RTaylor by its DIF, not to me.   And do not look for cheat adaptations or disguises ... they are transparent and open approaches from the beginning ... no second readings.

Anyway... i also assume that you will not have a single DASH ... liable to be sanctioned by the SEC.

Don't be dramatic, man. Good design right from the start saves a lot of headaches.

Have a good weekend.  

Ho,ho,ho...   ...No. A crypto with "independent" extensions...like the Cayman´s DIF. You need a million-buck magnet to get me to your ground, dear ...  

If you think you're going to bang the most perfectly designed extractive machine in history bare-chested with the "intrinsic value" that a gang of retarded men can generate that get knifed for half a fucking penny, you're pretty screwed. Great evils, great remedies.

BTC was cannon fodder without Tether to face infinite fiat. The only mistake was to make up his speech. But you don't go to war loaded with roses, my friend. And DASH, without a system of reception, retention, accumulation and progressive increase of INALIENABLE wealth ... will not win even your beloved DogeCoin. It's just a ball ready to kick ... no matter how much technology you add to it.

You see ... your thesis is worth doing pirouettes in the air ... do not complain about a lack of synergy and collective spirit.  

Even what is indicated in red I can read ... because its ME that i have exposed that ... you only try to link it to production, which is absolutely different.


I'm trading BTC now... and maybe later break down your post (to hit that hard head that you don't want to open   ) ... although everything will lead to separating the factors that you try to associate in a set that does not exist.

The Reserves model that I propose DOES provide a transfer of real wealth...to cover it. You're not stupid ... and you can't help but see it. And you can't help but see that without decentralizing DASH, the next victims are you, the MNodes, as vulnerable to a hyper-concentration model ... as everyone else.

As long as there are other means of producing a DEFAULT and perfectly defined increase in supply, that statement is not correct. And TokNormal knows it perfectly.

If the technological leap that CORE "sells us" is true, the marginalization of miners is not an attack on the DASH economy, but on its governance. It could represent an added value compared to the competition ... it could be.

I insist: The madness is not that the miners see their rewards diminished, that is at least debatable ... but that a cut in general expenses is oriented to private benefit and not to the general interest of the project. And, like everything else, for a CENTRALIZED decision in a few hundred people ... applicable to infinite situations ... with which the project lacks guarantees OF ANY KIND for those who are not able to categorically influence it.  That's the VERY SERIOUS problem.

The code is law ... but the law is me. So terrifying, that it practically repels any capital contribution to DASH, imo ... except those that determine a definitive influence ... which, obviously, would only accentuate a perverse loop that tends not to the existing centralization ... but to pure concentration.

LOL  

What a phony you are!

I mentioned SCARCITY to you three times in a row in the quote before your perpetual juggling and sleight of hand with an association of ideas that is not real. Of course ... you missed it ... because it dismantles your fallacies (the same ones you are trying to slide now).

Miners do not create SCARCITY, even if you try this deceptive association of ideas with dissimulation. They are supposed to automatically transmit a production cost to the mined token (which is also not correct per se) ... because attention! It is only so if the token is UTIL, if it is in demand. If it doesn't, you repeat the Keynesian stupidity of creating wealth by digging a ditch ... and then increasing it by covering it. That is typical of intoxicants and / or retards like Krugman or you ... who start from an economic premise in which cryptos have "intrinsic wealth" (a statement that you overturn in the second line of your pseudo-economic sermon ... and that was enough not to waste any more time with the rest of the pamphlet ) ... and that is a real bufoonery. Shitting 20 times and wiping your ass as many DOES NOT CREATE WEALTH. Precisely because you invest effort / work / costs ... in tasks WITHOUT VALUE, which will not retain those costs in the monetary asset created.

If your token is not scarce, that is, if the market does not demand it to install it at that juncture, increasing the supply will make it more abundant and less valuable, whether the miners or their grandmothers do it. The production costs will be a direct problem for the producers ... and they will not be automatically transmitted to the currency created / making it an indirect problem of the Mnodes) ... precisely because it has no intrinsic value, since its value is diluted in a market who despises that asset and discovers a ridiculous price compared to your different forecasts (both incorrect and worthy of real idiots disappointed because their "rain dance" does not work).

The DASH token is not in short supply because neither the mining nor the "rich" that xkcd desperately awaits - as well as the centralized layer of parasites that wants its elitist profile to be enough to create scarcity and thus support and project the price of its asset - they replace an actor that, in your mindless greed, you have marginalized and eliminated ... and that already existed, just as it exists in BTC: The Micro-HOLDERS, who covered a totally necessary and inexcusable demand for that task. We return to the same thing: The goat that you fucked and slaughtered ... NO LONGER MOVES ITS PELVIS from her, once dead. Is it really that hard to understand, kids?

Only an action that does not admit your imposed idiocies will be able to reverse - except for eventual pumps - that descending situation and without solution. Meanwhile ... it's time to laugh at how you sink the value of your own wealth into shit. Without a fork to overrule such a herd of retards, there will be no logical reorientation to this nonsense.

And as new resources, such as the blocking of tokens for the reservation of names in the new platform ... they are not accompanied by any objective and authorized estimate of that demand - example: an external audit - ... you will continue betting the value of DASH to the lottery. The show is pitiful:

- A lobby wants to perpetuate its parasitism by proposing the improvements for the mainnet as necessary.
- Another, blocking them ... and waiting for an army of rich idiots to throw their capital into a suicidal price trend.
- A fool, try to fool the rest with kindergarten fallacies to save taxes in UK...

... and, ok... every madman / scammer, with his theme!   Because that's what you have turned one of the best crypto projects in the world: In a shitty game between scammers.

You are going to pay for the perpetual inbreeding of your successive attempts at monopoly, with blood. You have already done it miserably in the ass of others, with traps, like the scammers that you are ... now, the spanking in your asses is worthy of open-mouthed laughter.

Which is not little fun ... and, yes, authentic poetic justice. Meanwhile ... the REAL DASH community, outcast and scammed ... to lower their buy stops accompanying this museum-worthy moron harakiri, patiently.

Cross the feet on the porch table, with a cold beer ... and wait to see how the corpse of thieves passes in the street.  

Beyond sarcasm ... what's your theory on that?

The problem is the blocking of Shared Mnodes and the torpedo to the waterline of the true spirit of DASH that Duffield aptly synthesized (Collective enrichment and anti-whale decentralization through a massive, global synergy that guarantees both)... that boicott was the real AND DESTRUCTOR qualitative  leap in the chain ... Greedy leap into the void that distort the entire DASH model. The best model to cause a crypto network effect ...a new money that all the world needs.

The miners' thing is just another overreach of the Mnodes on their centralized toy. Claiming that this causes the fall of a price that already broke shitty records from ATH 2017, before being implemented, but not even suggested that cut to the miners, is a cheap trick of a troll who wants to disguise his tax losses so that the situation that exacerbates them be changed ... but keeping the centralized corruption framework that destroys the project, nothing more. So it doesn't add shit, it's just the umpteenth twist of a sickly and destructively greedy vision in which this gang of morons is imprisoned ...and worst, wich who imprisoned any passionate about DASH.

The new Platform generates new returns, token locks, etc. ... new resources for the shortage of monetary assets. The problem is that the 200 corrupt DASH hijackers want to continue monopolizing the exploitation of the project: If they nullify the network effect, it simply won't work in a crypto revolution that envolves the world rigth now . However, if they decentralize it, if they share and open the project, the shortage will be enormous...and there will be punches looking for one DASH token, just like BEFORE ATH 2017. And interestingly, with themselves as main beneficiaries for their overwhelming disproportion in token ownership ... which makes their volunteer harakiri even more surprising and mindless    ...a Gold medal for nonsense . Such dysfunction only fits after the intellectual claustrophobia in which they have been installed for years since they "discovered" what they believed would be the philosopher's stone of their "perfect robbery": That neither is robbery ... far from it, perfect, only destructive garbage in the one that everyone loses.

The enrichment key must  necessary go through a main asset revaluation, the DASH token ... it's that simple: Returns shouldn't be the basis of your greed, but an optimal complement ...the contrary it's a stupid blindness. They want to catch success in crypto in front of 3000 projects that aspire to the same, but stupidly renouncing a tailwind that every one of those other 3000 projects dream about ... synergy that DASH already had and which it despised believing that a division among a few would compensate the equation. It's like I went out to run a marathon against 3000 runners arrogantly with your grandmother sitting on your shoulders.

And the answer couldn't be clearer: To hell and no brakes on a Mark Mason rollercoaster cart undear a pathetic rainbow of fireworks.

The key to DASH's projection is first in a shortage, shortage that can become unmeasured again ... and second - and Rtaylor is right in this - in generating OFF CHAIN ​​benefits that further expand the crypto ecosystem ... that transcend that crypto project to the real economy  (and in addition, they generate OFF CHAIN wealth that speculative crypto movements  - which are the fucking cancer of the crypto world and the perfect speculative BTC trap against each of the rest of the projects that piss in the face - cannot access or distort... inviolable , armored and definitive wealth for the DASH ecosystem ) - The DIF is the key, Rtaylor knows it and its movements in that sense, creating an extension with the ability to channel funds for it ( in the case that the fiscal move is correct face to the regulator that conditions DASH's movements - which is what you should be paying attention to and looking closely at, not the nonsense these fools obsess over - ) . The Mnodes refusal to raise funds for the growth of the project is a tribute to bullshit and cowardice and the typical expression of a redneck too dumb to recognize himself as such.: "As we are idiots and we spread a cascade money over a lot of nonsense projects  ... the fault is of the money dedicated to them , not ours, of course...... so, the financing of the ecosystem does not work" .

The last quarterly call of 2019 finally exposed the implementation of Shared Mnodes ... let's give the benefit of the doubt and accept that it was not the umpteenth cosmetic attempt to deceptively attract followers. Mr. Taylor, put your balls on the table and finish this homage to Caos and nonsense: Free yourself from this legion of unconscious subnormals who can't see beyond their noses and unleash the best project in the ranking with a Fork who knows how to thank with honesty and natural proportionality ALL the forces contributed and committed to DASH growth. You will fly to infinity and beyond and you will recapture your pompous speeches from 2017.

These idiots, if they were married Miss Universe, they would have her at home scrubbing all the day and tied to the leg of the table and swelling his statuesque body with donuts and beer and her Madonna face with depressive eye bags...reserved only for their selfish whims and premature ejaculation, because in addition to being cheats, they are simply incapable. Not one more minute of care or hope for them, fucking aneuronal garbage.

Obviusly, theres nothing to claim, they are two different projects and matters.

A fork should build its own Reserves. That is Duffield's huge contribution to crypto: The possibility of financing the project by snatching the exclusivity of monetary emissions rewards from the miners (RTaylor wanted to amplify it by stimulating general interest funds , which are those that contribute to the general reinforcement of the project as Taylor knows perfectly ... and the Mnodes only they robbed the miners and increased their own share, condemning the vocation of decentralization and collective enrichment, as in the case of the marginalized Shared Mnodes , also contemplated by Duffield).

Elitist parasitism in DASH stems from a corrupt part of its structure, conceived to administer the project management and its rules ... and which has falsely derived its role towards an orgy of private profit - of the ridiculous profit generated by a garbage currency , centralized and capriciously intervened, of course -   ). Duffield conceived DASH as an economic structure controlled by ALL its members ... but did not pay attention to the possible corruption of one of its parts, which, by blocking the enormous decentralization that a legion of micro-holders would bring, hijacked the project and its spirit of synergy. collective, which was what gave it absolutely limitless projection of expansion and adoption as consensus money, which is what these retardeds underestimated, believing that DASH's wealth not only was raining from the sky...... but also would continue to do so after their crap tricks.

Amputating that collective projection that Duffield understood perfectly, they cut off the head of that insurmountable approach. Now these idiots are looking for that tailwind in "technological excellence", "user usability", "sale of monopoly rights" - the famous "rich" of @xkcd - and other pathetic attempts ... that of course, they will never match , not even remotely, the tremendous power of the original approach of the project, because DASH does not attract support not even to redirect a fucking twiter message ... as is logical and normal , because they have stripped the project of all its power.

It is the price of turning a collaborator with whom to share ... into a client with whom to enrich yourself ...  who obviously will not contribute his money or his effort for that 4 clowns take advantage (the belief that "the public" is such idiot is not true... just a sample of how idiotic the Mnodes are). On the charts against BTC you have the most explicit graphical representation of how crypto sector receives that "conceptual fallacy" (In the opinion of this gang of immoral morons, a "perfect hit"    ) : Literally, ignoring it, even being a supposed "improved BTC" (the biggest improvement of DASH over BTC was already expressed before any recent technological optimization ... and it was that DASH was a BTC self-controlled by their followers and also, distributing dividends...which is an absolutely unbeatable magnetism for a collective project ( yes, BETTER than that of BTC )... Its so simple...that not be understood by the elite who hijacked DASH gives a perfect measure of their neural capacity ).

Global citizens who long to win back the useful money that the global elite has stolen ,  which is the trigger that has made crypto a necessary place to go en masse...are not looking to feed new parasites, even if they change their suits. (Yep yep ... those narcissistic morons who publicly declare that "The Mnodes are like the Fed" ... and then laugh at the "brightness of their own occurrence").

So , that which was snatched and excised from DASH by them is the first thing that must recover a fork of DASH. . Precisely because it is the DNA that DASH no longer has and that caused the perfect popular crossroads PRIOR to ATH 2017. Exactly that absence is what makes the "brilliant minds of DASH" throw their fists into the air, once and again,  as if they were hunting invisible flies ... or every other continuous samples, including stock charts, of dizzying fall into hell. It's like they slaughtering its favourite goat ... and complaining that it won't budge the next time they fuck it. Those are the wonderful mental mechanisms of the "generals" of this army.

That is a perfectly valid resource, more in front of the influence of BTC on the rest of cryptos. In fact, it is the way the DIF is effectively safeguarding at present its available resources. - by the way, light years from the catastrophic performance of DASH as a Store of value ... wealth deposit that the Mnodes chose incredibly at the start of this department ( what, beyond particular preferences and after managing to "set aside" those assets , logically condemned the savings donated to the DIF to the same speculative threats that the entire ecosystem suffered, which was a complete attack to the most elemental logic ...as usual) -. And by the way, casually, an approach suggested by afbitcoins here for a few weeks ... that you said you would approve if it were proposed for DASH.  

Anyway...this is all so simple and obvious ... and your gratuitous sermons (and previously, the endorsement of your assertions with monosyllables that meant absolutely nothing) are so out of place, that I can't help but understand perfectly that your trolls and tax interest poorly concealed they preside over each of their posts.

Who can be surprised, in those terms, of the unfortunate disaster that this jewel has suffered. What we are seeing is no accident ... but the totally logical culmination of a process developed over years.

You have a stable coin between your eyebrows and I do not suggest that by any means, I have already told you days before. It is absolutely evident that a Reserves strategy does not imply that any bank, for example, - which has usually assumed these strategies for centuries - does not aspire that its Gold Reserves are the only key to the growth of this entity, sería ridículo ...and it's hard to believe that someone interprets that like this. For me, everything is a question of proportions and in fact, there are no major differences from the approaches that DASH already adopts in its current model. I think it was quite clear, although at some time, in the run, perhaps he has explained little to me.

This comment is from almost a month ago.



When I refer to Reserves and to show a 1: 1 ratio in a fork that leaves from ZERO, I mean a discovery of "inalienable wealth" of the cap ... of some "minimums" that can never be extracted from the project by speculative movements . Really, it would be a partial endorsement. But even those Reserves would be understood to be subject to interesting investments for the benefit of the project (although with the established dogma that "The Mnodes do not optimize financing / investments", it would subject any movement to analysis of the utmost rigor ... and if those tests are not passed, the Reserves are fine where they are. And working while nothing is done ... but it is a good measure not to give away money - better than to dump it to particular benefits of the MNodes, as some suggest now -)

It could, in any case, be seen as a "Hybrid" approach, but never renounce fundamentals of the project such as technological development and others, which obviously would add value to the price defined by the pure accumulation of Reserves ... that would be ridiculous. I do not understand DASH without contributions to its development ... nor that development is worth ZERO. In fact, this "hybrid" strategy would be a very good claim for a "secured" investment in a currency that, in addition, obviously has other fundamentals, like so many other proposals in the crypto ranking.

It's a no-brainer, but just in case and seeing your perspective, I clarify it.


And, of course, I continue to maintain that a fork of those characteristics "nested or" linked "to DASH, would help to achieve greater rigor in the original project and would even invite support, otherwise, actions from that new approach - that his reservations, he could, of course, consider positions in Mnodes that would provide a more relevant collective voice in the "original" DASH -. And of course, from a much more inclusive project and representative of ALL its community from day one ... that would secure HODL positions in defense of the asset that today in DASH have simply been discarded due to contempt for the more modest holders beyond the Mnodes owners, which I have always considered an arrogant and unacceptable nonsense and greatly aggravates a Stock to Flow that at these levels of movement eat the price of the central asset by the foot ... which is absolutely terrifying to look at that chart.

OK ... an example, in your opinion, thanks.

However, I am referring to the limitations of using DASH open source, supposedly for public use, as a tool to launch such a project.

Because you claim that this is not possible. Why exactly?

So what about? Where are the limitations for it?

What is the profile in which you think that type of approach fits?