Epsylon, mining on https://aeon.kryptopool.com/# but also other Aeon pools i noticed that the informative "New block detected" message does not appear. Any clue? P.S. Donation just sent  with BTC transaction into 8a5192301da7fb8318377f5a45f72f039b903f8ced21f47c2cd2c0c6de92c535 |
|
|
|
Hello folks, I'm looking into doing some exploratory CPU Mining and I find AEON to be quite interesting. I have not been able to find a profitability calculator for it and I was wondering if anyone knew of one? Thanks!
https://minergate.com/calculator/cryptonoteNote: Don't use minergate's pool, your hashrate will be lower and they scam users trying to withdraw XMR. if you managed to withdraw XMR from here i don't want to hear it, i've tried everything and after 3-4 support tickets and just as many excuses they are without a doubt selective scamming at best Note taken. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
Just for trying I'm CPU mining on Minergate with minerd
minerd -a cryptonight-lite -o stratum+tcp://aeon.pool.minergate.com:45690 -u mylogin_email -p x -t 2
Yet according to my own dashboard I'm not mining.
Any idea?
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
daberti: that look like a cursor... i dont think its present on windows 7... only seen it in sgminer
Understood. Thanks |
|
|
|
quote author=Epsylon3 link=topic=770064.msg18585225#msg18585225 date=1492169671] euh, unsure i understand what you mean by " thick White horizontal line in the rightmost position of the line" could you do some screenshot ? [/quote] Sure. As soon as I'll see it again. It is like an underscore char, White and bold. EDIT: Here we go https://www.dropbox.com/s/dyurw5azmd8ze84/The_white_line.jpg?dl=0 |
|
|
|
 Welcome to the discussion thread for my ccminer fork. This variant was based on cbuchner1 v1.2 beta, and now supports colored output, stats API, multiple pools, conditional mining and time limits, and many other features. It contains most algorithms, except the ones specifically made cpu such as m7m. Some of the first algorithms were implemented by djm34, adapted to be usable on both linux and windows. My releases are generally tuned for the Geforce GTX 750Ti, which is a good reference for tests (Linux + Windows) and has less hashrate drop in activity (unlike the 9xx series). Epsylon, I'm using latest version (win binaries) on https://aeon.kryptopool.com/#Geforce GTX 750Ti here, with latest NVidia win64 driver and 575 H/s. Every now and then I can spot in the output a thick White horizontal line in the rightmost position of the line. What is its meaning? Thanks for your SW. |
|
|
|
cmake 3.4.3, boost 1.63 static, git 2.11.0.windows.3 other stuff: python 3.5.1, visual studio community 2015 (msbuild 14.0.23107.0), commands are typed through Git Shell about boost static: cd c:\local\boost_1_63_0
bootstrap.bat
b2 --toolset=msvc-14.0 variant=release link=static threading=multi runtime-link=static address-model=64 if you don't distribute your executables, no need to compile boost, you can use binaries https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost-binaries/1.63.0/ (shared libs) Here: CMake 3.7.2, boost same, git 2.10.1.windows.1, Python 3.6.1150.0 . I'll try with your cmake version. Thanks IMPORTANT EDIT: Visual Studio community 2015 and msbuild 14.0.25420.1 here (VS 2015 Update 3). This might well be the clue. |
|
|
|
|
@Arux
When you did compile 0.9.11 for win, which versions of CMake, Boost and Git did you use?
Just to crosscheck.
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
yeah
Both cpu and gpu
gee, you're a daredevil...with a lot of hashing power, though  |
|
|
|
I will start the Aeon mining
How to make a wallet
Which pool do you recommend
thank you
I'm using https://aeon.kryptopool.com/. I'm earning twice what I was a minersgate.com. Daemon and Wallet are at: https://github.com/aeonix/aeonFirst you run the daemon aeond, when it is synced up you run the simplewallet. +1 for that pool. Are you CPU mining or GPU mining? |
|
|
|
Thanks for your reply, I'm sure, that node was connected at moment of coin transfer. I've tried to restart it, but it doesn't help, at least immediately. Anyway, coins successfully arrived to it destination, but with long delay. Hi, Devs.
I've sent AEON coins from my wallet using simplewallet to my bittrex acc, as usual. Wallet shows me transaction ID, but coins just disappeared from balance, and lost somewhere on the way. Since that moment passed 10 hours, but transaction doesn't even appear in blockchain. How could it be?
Usually this happens if your node is not connected to any peers when you send the transfer. You can recover the coins by: 1. Shut down your node 2. Delete poolstate.bin 3. Restart node 4. Renaming the wallet data file (then one that does not end in .keys or .address) 5. Start wallet. Since it won't find the data file, it will rescan; when done your coins should be recovered and you can try sending again. Check print_cn in the node to make sure it is connected first. I'd probably put that useful info as sticky for newsbies. |
|
|
|
|
Back from assistance to customers and aeond shown me this:
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.444162 [P2P0]ERROR C:\Users\Arno\Documents\GitHub\aeon-0.9.11.0\src\cryptonote_core\tx_pool.cpp:108
Transaction with id= <b6cc15ab785da1aec732dc69ea0e78de1c7dec388659ad2245b42acc210317db> used already spent key images
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.448148 [P2P0]Transaction verification failed: <b6cc15ab785da1aec732dc69ea0e78de1c7dec388659ad2245b4
2acc210317db>
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.450152 [P2P0][178.63.72.22:11180 OUT]Tx verification failed, dropping connection
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.456168 [P2P4]ERROR C:\Users\Arno\Documents\GitHub\aeon-0.9.11.0\src\cryptonote_core\tx_pool.cpp:108
Transaction with id= <b6cc15ab785da1aec732dc69ea0e78de1c7dec388659ad2245b42acc210317db> used already spent key images
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.460178 [P2P4]Transaction verification failed: <b6cc15ab785da1aec732dc69ea0e78de1c7dec388659ad2245b4
2acc210317db>
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.462184 [P2P4][5.9.145.6:11180 OUT]Tx verification failed, dropping connection
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.465192 [P2P0]ERROR C:\Users\Arno\Documents\GitHub\aeon-0.9.11.0\src\cryptonote_core\tx_pool.cpp:108
Transaction with id= <b6cc15ab785da1aec732dc69ea0e78de1c7dec388659ad2245b42acc210317db> used already spent key images
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.468200 [P2P0]Transaction verification failed: <b6cc15ab785da1aec732dc69ea0e78de1c7dec388659ad2245b4
2acc210317db>
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.469203 [P2P0][176.195.218.37:11180 OUT]Tx verification failed, dropping connection
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.472211 [P2P8]ERROR C:\Users\Arno\Documents\GitHub\aeon-0.9.11.0\src\cryptonote_core\tx_pool.cpp:108
Transaction with id= <b6cc15ab785da1aec732dc69ea0e78de1c7dec388659ad2245b42acc210317db> used already spent key images
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.475219 [P2P8]Transaction verification failed: <b6cc15ab785da1aec732dc69ea0e78de1c7dec388659ad2245b4
2acc210317db>
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.477225 [P2P8][136.243.67.79:11180 OUT]Tx verification failed, dropping connection
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.480233 [P2P3]ERROR C:\Users\Arno\Documents\GitHub\aeon-0.9.11.0\src\cryptonote_core\tx_pool.cpp:108
Transaction with id= <b6cc15ab785da1aec732dc69ea0e78de1c7dec388659ad2245b42acc210317db> used already spent key images
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.483241 [P2P3]Transaction verification failed: <b6cc15ab785da1aec732dc69ea0e78de1c7dec388659ad2245b4
2acc210317db>
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.484244 [P2P3][5.9.69.142:11180 OUT]Tx verification failed, dropping connection
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.487251 [P2P2]ERROR C:\Users\Arno\Documents\GitHub\aeon-0.9.11.0\src\cryptonote_core\tx_pool.cpp:108
Transaction with id= <b6cc15ab785da1aec732dc69ea0e78de1c7dec388659ad2245b42acc210317db> used already spent key images
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.490260 [P2P2]Transaction verification failed: <b6cc15ab785da1aec732dc69ea0e78de1c7dec388659ad2245b4
2acc210317db>
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.492265 [P2P2][46.119.100.7:11180 OUT]Tx verification failed, dropping connection
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.495273 [P2P8]ERROR C:\Users\Arno\Documents\GitHub\aeon-0.9.11.0\src\cryptonote_core\tx_pool.cpp:108
Transaction with id= <b6cc15ab785da1aec732dc69ea0e78de1c7dec388659ad2245b42acc210317db> used already spent key images
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.498281 [P2P8]Transaction verification failed: <b6cc15ab785da1aec732dc69ea0e78de1c7dec388659ad2245b4
2acc210317db>
2017-Apr-10 16:18:02.500285 [P2P8][91.121.81.92:11180 OUT]Tx verification failed, dropping connection
|
|
|
|
@ Folks of aeon.kryptopool.com Hey guys, I'm sending to you hashes over hashes and your site states that my last one dates back to 2hrs ago. Go and check, please  |
|
|
|
i'm sorry, i can't reproduce this bug. with same instructions, this is the content of build/src/release and build/tests/release on my side.   in your output log, i noticed some messages about "xamarin", did you use a special toolchain? Nope, as far as I'm aware of.
Uninstalled. I'll try again later. Tried, with a bunch of errors from MSVC. Any other compiler to suggest, maybe MinGW? |
|
|
|
Reorganizations happen when there is temporarily a disagreement about what the longest chain is. It happens in every Cryptocurrency, and the shorter the block time, the more frequent it happens.
Understood thanks 👍🏻 |
|
|
|
|
What's that?
2017-Apr-06 19:05:37.047321 [P2P4]----- BLOCK ADDED AS ALTERNATIVE ON HEIGHT 810515
id: <ec158fa47625402228976e50c1e4d632771f21828d7cdb0fdb779aa956dc18eb>
PoW: <f64965d48c49fed6d19ff4edf4c379125f0b5ed5a366b65ad2f52e7305000000>
difficulty: 185958015
2017-Apr-06 19:10:17.425931 [P2P9]###### REORGANIZE on height: 810515 of 810515 with cum_difficulty 29038167421497
alternative blockchain size: 2 with cum_difficulty 29038353454389
2017-Apr-06 19:10:17.982411 [P2P9]----- BLOCK ADDED AS ALTERNATIVE ON HEIGHT 810515
id: <c25181c95818948cbc74f6fe4230d7f6f6dce35f5c2bf8ef59e6f31395a11c78>
PoW: <cc46cf89bfb3d5ae8f2e706bfe635d52766fe18147b36c4e8ff1aab804000000>
difficulty: 185958015
2017-Apr-06 19:10:17.994414 [P2P9]REORGANIZE SUCCESS! on height: 810515, new blockchain size: 810517
|
|
|
|
I understand this yes. I have a public and a private pool. I use diff designation with my private pool and have explained this to many miners on my public pool. We use xxxxxxxaeonxxxaddressxxxx.(diff here) example xxxx.5000 dependent on the miners best submission rate within 15-30 sec intervals so as to reduce load to the pool. I have been mining this way for over a year now, thank you for the explanation and perhaps I will now try the -m function in 2.0 (which I use with some of my rigs)
You're welcome. The program I mentioned is for Cuda only, though. |
|
|
|
You mean software? Same as I have been with much better luck before updates.
Yes, I meant software, sorry. Are you talking from a miner's perspective or a Pool mantainer perspective? Its a pool,(I am an operator) I understand the averaging nature of blockfinding but I believe the network is being slowed down somehow in general considering other peripheral reports regarding tx's. I have no proof of this it is purely observational. Just answered above |
|
|
|
You mean software? Same as I have been with much better luck before updates.
Yes, I meant software, sorry. Are you talking from a miner's perspective or a Pool mantainer perspective? In any case the solution is the same. Normally a miner goes to the getting Ready section of the pool, has a look at the configs and addresses the port with the lowest difficulty. After which he/she calls it a day. If the software on pool's side works, and talks appropriately with mining software it may work, but this introduces an overhead to pool's brain that finds itself continuously calculating the appropriate diff for each connected miner, getting meanwhile a certain amount of shares which are simply Beyond its own calculating power. A possible solution exists: educating the miners to set their own diff, according to their own hardware power. This is done by carefully running their mining software distinguishing each pc of the rig from the others by the username.rig config. But most important thing is to set a multiplier factor if using mining software that allows for it. I.e., under ccminer-2.0-rc2-cuda-8.0 which supports Aeon, there is the -m option that defines the multipling factor of the diff as agreed by handshake with pool. A GTX1070 will have nearly the double of Aeon hashing power of a GTX1050Ti which in turn will be roughly 6/4 of a GTX960M. GTX940M will be 1/8th of GTX1070. So if mining software tells you the handshake had been at Diff 1 for GTX940M, it will be a good idea to set it at -m 1 and GTX1070 will be -m 8 . As a starting point. The other ones will be set accordingly. The connection will be done with the lowest starting diff port of the pool, which will be relieved from a lot of useless work. Miner will see a much more constant hash rate (and more money). |
|
|
|
Finding blocks pool mining, very bad luck! Anyone else?
810289 188267818 cece5e7a3b76be01bfa70eb240de346cdccd0343b9ed4c8f4b1b2a6c78469026 4/5/2017, 10:46:13 PM 272%
810144 177517822 e8eaeb6a8bd2cd5fcdc3b56181a3fac373cbfb6c6cdd778cddc7ca01345ce73d 4/5/2017, 12:41:01 PM 750%
What SW are you using? Linux platform or Win? EDIT: What SW you use in order to mine |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
