mmmhhh, 't 'll be lower than 0.017 by next Monday if it keeps goin' like this

Reasons, based on markey analysis, please.

I'm with you until the point that a fork helps BTC not to be saturated. It can help if it has the support of a community, rules of consensus, know developers, possibly signed code, non tampered Git rep, non compromised wallets, safe website (3,000,000 USD stolen), fair mining.
What's happened had shown a whole different ballgame: a Corporate coin.

I'm sorry, but BTG it's taking an almighty dumping for all of that.

Define soon and why you're expecting that.
As it looks like being a freefall

In last eight hours three hammers, one inverted hammer and a gravestone (in mixed order).
Downtrend of course.

OP?

I had 20 PC ready to be used as nodes/mining.
First node up: stolen claimed BTG.
No need even to do some wiresharking. Node down.

What you mean by inclusive? Just asking.
To kick away any misunderstanding: I was a Day-1 believer in BTG. I WAS.
Anyway, after all of the cock-ups BTG has made -directly AND/OR indirectly- it is no longer a matter of advantages (true or false does not matter here), but it is all about lost trust.
We can keep on talking about anything, but trust had been lost about the BTG development and the way it had been handled. These are the feelings around.
And let me say this once again, I believed in that coin.

Last but not least: the common reasoning about a BTC alternative had always HAD the pivotal point in the Algo or Block Size or Segwit (whichever Segwit it was).
Three of them in a row have been shown to be wrong. One of them having been honourably called-off (before gross-failure), with the full lot of Headquarters acknowledging that they missed to really understand in proper times the point (but I'd like to remember to all of you that they should have seen their own predicament in the very moment they denied any Replay Protection, thus optin' for being a "network starvation attack").
Point is NOT miners, is NOT Algo and NOT even jummy airdrops: point is Consensus. Point are Nodes. The two latest BTC Forks had clearly done their own utmost in order to demonstrate all the possible about aiming to create private playgrounds and nothing more. Nodes numbers clearly show that. Bitcoin Cash at least understood that point and it was rewarded for that.

The reasons why BCH did, which I already explained here, won't repeat for BTG.
Just as a recall: there are nil chances that another band of NYA failed fork refugees (exchanges and miners) sharing in this case the same algo as BTG will find it an appetible option.
Best option being that it will be a mine and dump coin like PXC and other ones.

Anyway BCH is approaching levels up to mid of closing level of Nov 10th, FYI

Unfortunately it is was much more than that.
For those who still did NOT get it: no consensus rules, hidden chief dev, no signing, no announce on this forum = corporate crypto
But they are taking the well deserved punishment, despite their pumping.
Their stealing money (website hosted fake wallets and their own official wallet) it is something that will be kept in memory and embossed on marble.

28.3K trade volume on Nov. 23rd and 1.49k Yesterday. 123 (officially available) nodes.
Dump while still possible.

Finally you got it !!!

Nope. There is mining code injected in the QT exe file and detected as such. And if you install the package the problem will extend to the uninstall.exe file as well.
See my post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2171754.msg25555239#msg25555239 just above

Steer away from official wallet.

Long answer:
1)install MalwareBytes latest version.

2)Download current official BTG QT wallet for Windows and check SHA256 checksum

3)Run the installer, give a Yes to Security Prompt, wait for a GUI to appear and leave it in that state

4)Open MalwareBytes and tell it to do a scan

Share your results

Short answer: Coinomi or Bither+Bitpie combination.

For long answer wait an hour or alike

Well, too many things gone wrong way..
I just shut it down my BTG node.
I cannot afford running such a controversial (sent 0.40 claimed BTG into nil, and it was the non-controversial version) piece of SW, made by an unknown developer, unsigned on top of that.
One node less for BTG. Sorry.
Switch your behaviour BTG guys (and give me back that sum) and I'll be able to switch mine. All that simple.

The idea was promising. The implementation the worst possible.

Replied with PM

Ya hit a big pile of bullshit  

0.024 and MACD declining
No news 

What I wrote was that BTG (Bitcoin Gold) was pumped with a minimal amount of effort..as always.

BTC (Bitcoin), if that's what you were talking about, had exchanged nearly 350m on 09,10,11,12 November with red candles. Reaching 5428.5 USD Low on the latest day, from 7350 USD close of 8 November, and breaking the support line (already explained why). On the 16th it closed at 7860 USD, with a full recover and a margin over the closing of November the 8th and after 4 days of uptrend green candles.
Point is that despite  the Bitcash fork, despite the SEGWIT2X meant  and then called off fork and the retaliation policy of the NYA following the failure (selling BTC and purchasing BCC), despite BTG fork, despite the all Goddamned things, BTC has attitude to go beyond that.
On the 29th from 11.2k high to 9.7k close (USD) after an 8.7k low (trying to break the support line). On the 30th another attempt to do that (which admittedly very slightly succedeed): but with a 9.9k close and green candle. Why should have Alexey14 sold his BTC? I gave the appropriate answer right before the closing UTC time.
Now, with RSI(14) at 76.6 everything beyond 10.3k USD has to be regarded as mere speculation for at least one full day, probably two days.
I expect 9.8-10k USD as a reasonable high price, with close a little lower and Low just probably at 8.750k USD, with a new Support line  .

This was not understood by Eastern exchanges starting from 4-5 days ago and that was used by mentioned people to sell their stakes of BTC at pumped prices.

And that is why I'm basing on a less hysterical exchange as Bittrex.

Funny that the solution is coming from an ASIC manifacturer 

I’ll answer when back home 👍🏻