 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
|
Still $100 coupons available! Offers welcome
|
|
|
|
I’ll buy it
He didn't purchase it. |
|
|
|
|
I'm selling some Bitmain coupons, for crypto (or PayPal).
Coupons :
$100 - Price: $3 (Multiple left)
$200 - Price: $29
$400 - Price: $89
$450 - Price: $99
Escrow is accepted!
|
|
|
|
For a given hashrate, the U3 uses 6.1458333 times more power(electric) than the S9. (S9 Electric usage per hash) * (6.145833333333333) = (U3 Electric usage per hash) Because, math. Comparing "overall" is like saying a jet uses more fuel than a moped.  Right, I simply commented his(/her) moped<->jet comparison: "Funny to see newer generation device is like 230x times faster than previous one." I was saying 230x hashrate because it uses more power, not that it uses 230x more power.. |
|
|
|
I'm not sure that the U3 at 590 w/TH (0.59w/GH) is less power than the S9 96 w/TH is "using less power", but ok
If you have one U3 and one S9, I'm pretty sure that although the S9 mines more, it uses significantly more power than the U3, but ok |
|
|
|
To the old miner's defense, the S9 has about 50x more chips and uses much more power than a U3 |
|
|
|
Port 3333.
Hi, I work with good number of accepted using cgminer in Windows 7 connecting to port 3333, but in a Rapberry I cant use this port, only 4334, without good results.
May the differents internet networks affects?
How can I test the pool and ports in Debian?
What mining hardware are you using?... |
|
|
|
Perhaps such things as suggestions/proposals should be accompanied by an incentive and/or working code...
#JustSayin'
Sure. For every byte present in the completed code, I will pay: 1 satoshi*0.003176*pool_hashrate*1.00038*last_block_diff*0*1.22819*total_users. Or I can add 1 PH to the pool  |
|
|
|
Would that bring us another 100PH of miners? Investing more and more time in this pool for free gets harder as time goes on if the pool doesn't take off much more.
Yes, it will. Or maybe not Doesn't have to be added today, it was only a suggestion/proposal.
(Moderator's note: This post was edited by frodocooper to fix broken quote formatting.) |
|
|
|
|
-ck, could you add some more stats to the pool, such as "All time Diff"/"Last 10 blocks average Diff", "Total pool payout count", "30 day hashrate", "Hashrate within this PPLNS"(The user's hashrate, calculated by the users herp submitted within the '5x network difficutly' period)?
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your help CK. I changed the port to 4334 and removed the worker extension. The owner of the rig is saying "diff shows 1MEG on the miner. It will never return any hash at that diff. Diff should be about 12k."
It will return hashes, it'll simply take a longer time (also means your effective pool hashrate will fluctuate a lot more). Assuming you're mining with an Antminer S9, you'll get a share every 5-6 minutes (on average). |
|
|
|
What about Awesome Miner?
... [...] and AwesomeMiner is currently out of budget.
|
|
|
|
but my worker isnt in the "work" section, so this current block = no payout just like the last 2.
Sorry, didn't notice you've mined previous rounds. Not sure what could be the cause then. |
|
|
|
Pool Hash rate = 7000 TH/s
128% probability to win a block in 1 month
Alas these are wrong. There is no such thing as 100% probability with mining which is a stochastic process. It keeps approaching 100% but never gets there. Maybe better to say Your Hash rate = 13 TH/s -> If you have neutral luck you will mine 1 block in 35,55 years Pool Hash rate = 7000 TH/s -> Having neutral luck 1 block will be mined in 24 days (or 1.28 blocks in 1 month, even it is imposible to mine 0,28 blocks) Definetively, 128% luck doesn't make any sense 128% luck would make sense. Just not 128% probability, right? |
|
|
|
Ok, i try to use old GPU for mining it's just for fun, not to make money. I want to do mining my old GPU for a test project  Then find an old version of a bitcoin miner (old cgminer maybe), and mine bitcoins with it. |
|
|
|
Hello, I'm french and i just begin in mining I try to mine ZCASH with old Nvidia GPU (9600GT). But, when i run the miner, it closes instantly. I can read before close, "Error: Cuda driver version is insufficient for cuda runtime version" ... I don't understand I have install CUDA 9.1 and 341.92 driver Maybe I should have install CUDA 6.5 ?? Can you help me please  (Sorry for my bad english  ) Matt First of all, you should always give basic info as What OS you're using, what mining software, etc... 9600GT isn't a CUDA GPU Looked at wrong GPU. The 9600gt is far to old and has far to little ram to be useful or even capable at mining such coins at all. I'd recommend looking for a second hand 1070 or 1060. |
|
|
|
Some say the the miners mine better between 55-60c. Others below 50c. Some say change Frequency as high as you can keeping temp below 70c. Others say that some will mine better below the default Frequency. This is what mine shows, removed Wallet Address and name of second pool. Started on this pool a few days ago, "herp": 628989567.1150126 (what ever that means in payment if we ever find a block)  What would you recommend on settings for me? You want it as cold as possible. You could even cool it using eg. watercooling, it's just that the tiny gain is not worth it. Look at "derp" to find your expected reward. |
|
|
|
I'm still unclear how you get paid from this pool? I've moved out of the 'herp' section into the block section on the pool.work page ... please advise - thanks! <-- Replace "XX" with your btc address. There you'll see "derp", which is the expected reward you'll receive if a block is found. If the pool does, your reward will be queued and be paid out in a future block that this pool mines. You will be paid if your balance is above a minimum dust amount, and your balance is among the 100 biggest OR among the 50 who has waited the longest for a payout. |
|
|
|
I've been playing around with the website and flask to see if I could build something. It's only a start... http://35.196.38.106/Thanks for that. I hate to tell you this, but it's funny, someone else has already been working on an interface and they've made more good progress so I don't want to see you duplicate work. Hold off doing anything else with it as hopefully I should have something to put up soon. This? http://ckpool.org/test.html |
|
|
|
|
