 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
|
If you use your CPU to mine BURST with while mining on your GPUs, you won't have any issues other than that CPU miners are slower so you might occasionally miss a deadline on a "fast mined" block.
The GPU-assisted BURST miners can work as well, but they get a LOT slower when you're also mining something else on that GPU.
Ahh okay that sounds legit, I think ill just go with the CPU for now then, maybe spread out the load between rigs since they're only dual core CPU's |
|
|
|
I've tried looking around but there is very little information on what Claymore's does over the network. I see the output here http://localhost:3333/ but I assume there's some other endpoint for less horribly formatted information. As for sending commands, I have no idea, i've tried sending POST requests at the same url but never get a response. you will need to send json messages over plain sockets (and dont forget to append "\n") here is the stats request: '{"id":0,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"miner_getstat1"}' I did find this one and attempt to do it with a simple Node script but the response I was getting is the same as when you send a get request at http://localhost:3333/ which responds with HTML you can see how i did it in node, eg here: https://github.com/felixbrucker/miner-manager/blob/master/api/controllers/miningController.js#L723and excuse the horrible code  Thanks, that's helpful seeing an example |
|
|
|
Im not asking for a mining manager suggestions |
|
|
|
read up on the miner's "API"
There isn't anything to read up on the Miner's API, they havn't documented anything. typically; the API binds automatically to some port; and you will have to look up how to interface with the API yourself if you don't use someone else's pre-configured/coded program.
Typically for a custom set of API data, you would have to write a program or script to send data to the remote (or local) port(s) and listen for a return of data to display to you....
Yes I know I have to write a program, that's why i'm asking what endpoints they expose
I've tried looking around but there is very little information on what Claymore's does over the network. I see the output here http://localhost:3333/ but I assume there's some other endpoint for less horribly formatted information. As for sending commands, I have no idea, i've tried sending POST requests at the same url but never get a response. you will need to send json messages over plain sockets (and dont forget to append "\n") here is the stats request: '{"id":0,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"miner_getstat1"}' I did find this one and attempt to do it with a simple Node script but the response I was getting is the same as when you send a get request at http://localhost:3333/ which responds with HTML |
|
|
|
|
Hey everyone, was just curious if anyone knew what endpoints the miner exposes?
I've tried looking around but there isn't any documentation, explanations, examples for how to monitor the miner with our own programs, there is only the program bundled with it but that only works on windows and only works on a local network which is very limiting.
|
|
|
|
I've tried looking around but there is very little information on what Claymore's does over the network. I see the output here http://localhost:3333/ but I assume there's some other endpoint for less horribly formatted information. As for sending commands, I have no idea, i've tried sending POST requests at the same url but never get a response. |
|
|
|
Hi  This is my first rig that i'm building and i need help 4 X Gigabyte rx580 4GB gaming 1 X MSI Z270 OS -EthOS I need help with: 1) the hash rate it only 21.5MHs  i need help to change bios mode or oc them 2) one card not recognize i will try to find who is 3) add Wifi support for EthOS the most important it number 1 support by skype and payment with BTC please send me message if you have to knowledge Thanks shai For $20 at my hourly rate you'd have me for about 10 minutes |
|
|
|
IT IS NOT A SCAM I HAVE BEEN MINING WITH IT
EQUIHASHER A1
These are device design which are best
If not want to believe dont believe it
First i remember when antminer miners came people said it is scam
How it is and now people like their products
It works
lol, sure, says the person with a brand new account |
|
|
|
25 euro per TB is about right the seagate barracuda cost 200 +, i can't find much cheaper than that, the roi is pretty good on those HDD, they can roi in 3 months with current burst profit
Any ideas if this profit % is going to hold? |
|
|
|
|
Hey guys, so I have a couple of 570's that I'm mining on and a lot of HDD's laying around so I was thinking of starting to mine Burst, so was just wondering if any has some experience doing this or if it's even a good idea to mine both Coins at the same time
|
|
|
|
|
It's impossible to predict anything more than a month away from now, let alone 5 years. And don't expect that a single upfront investment will last you for 5 years, especially with ASIC coins, Bitmain will come out with a new ASIC and your one will be worthless.
|
|
|
|
|
Another idea I was thinking might be to take the small fan off and instead point a larger fan at it, not sure if it would push enough air into it though
|
|
|
|
You can reduce fan speed of you do not push the unit.
So how many watts do you want to use with it.
My calculations show about 1050W at max so 1155W accounting for efficiency which is about 72% load. Im still awaiting some adapters and risers so can't test the real load yet. |
|
|
|
|
So I brought the APW3+ PSU from Bitmain because of it's high efficiency and good price but totally overlooked the noise it produces. So now im looking for ways to try reduce the noise from it, it dosen't need to be whisper quiet since it's in a room far away, but reducing it by at least a little bit is needed.
How have you guys tackled such problems?
One thing I saw mentioned was putting in a small resistor so the fan has a lower RPM, any reasons why I shouldn't attempt this?
|
|
|
|
Ideally you should overclock just to the point where it's stable and without HW errors. It's not just about getting the maximum possible hashrate out of your cards. Stability and power consumption are also a factor. Typically the more more you overclock, the more power is used, so there is a diminishing return point where overclocking is just pushing the cards over their capacity for little to no benefit in your bottom line.
From the calculations i've done it's more profitable for me to get a higher hashrate rather than balance the power usage out, however stability is still important. As mentioned above with 2075 mem freq I get 29.6 MH on ETH and 860 MH on DRC at 150W which I think is reasonable enough aslong as those 1-5 errors per 30 min isn't an issue |
|
|
|
Yes, overclocking too much will cause hardware errors, which will cause the miner to report more valid shares than you are actually getting credit for. Older miners like sgminer and cgminer used to report HW errors. I don't know why miners like Claymore's stopped reporting them.
Ahhh okay thanks. I've clocked it back to 2075 which reports about 1-5 errors over a 30 min period, do you think that's fine? |
|
|
|
|
So I've been overclocking my cards and i've noticed that once I go up to about 2100 on the memory frequency I start getting memory errors reporting on HWINFO, about 1000 errors over 5 minutes but claymores doesn't complain so I'm wondering if this is something to be concerned about?
|
|
|
|
|
tytanick I just started using this and as someone relatively new to Mining it's an awesome set of software, thank you for making it.
However, I do have a complaint for you; the browser UI is in a pretty bad state imo. At a guess i'd say you're very much a back end sorta person and so I don't blame you, it works so why make it better aye? So anyway, I was just wondering if there was any plans to make some improvements on it
|
|
|
|
you won't get warning for mem. errors from the miner Test the card by letting it work for 24h. If it survives 24h its good and stable Hmmm, well the errors im referring to are the ones reported by HWINFO, after dialing it back to 2025 mem freq then they no longer occur at the cost of Hashrate of cause , so you are saying these errors don't matter? well it looks like they don't really affect found shares, or not in a way i'm aware of. Interesting, well for now I think i'm gonna stick to a freq without errors which the highest I can get is 2075 which gives me 29.6MH when I use a core voltage offset of -96. Thanks again for the help  |
|
|
|
you won't get warning for mem. errors from the miner Test the card by letting it work for 24h. If it survives 24h its good and stable Hmmm, well the errors im referring to are the ones reported by HWINFO, after dialing it back to 2025 mem freq then they no longer occur at the cost of Hashrate of cause , so you are saying these errors don't matter? |
|
|
|
|
