To some persons, the present price of Bitcoin in the market is too high and they can't buy. While to some, they rather wait for the Dip season before they enter the market, while to some, they seize the opportunity and buy and HODL.

Now, you decided to buy at the current price and HODL, and after some years, the price moved from this present $90k+ to $150k to $200k or even +.

Another investor decided to wait for the Dip before they started investing, and there is no decline showing up, and they keep waiting and never started.

And another while waiting for a decline in price before they get started, and since they saw no decline but continuous increase in price, and  they finally decided to buy, and they ended up buying at $95-99k or even $200k

Looking at this 3 investors, who made better investment decisions? Who would be at gains at a long run? Who benefits more?
 
It's clear that the investor who decided to start buying with his discretionary income not minding the present market price continously, and HODL will be in better positions and profit as the price keep climbing or even though it drops because he has been able to stack some BTC in his portfolio while others were delaying.

If you are able to discover your discretionary, starting right away is the best option despite the market price, and gradually, using the DCA strategy, you can acquire some BTC while you keep growing your income and your portfolio

Unfortunately, you can't generalize like that.

If a casino explicitly excludes the use of a VPN for their site, then it doesn't matter whether you live in a country that has access to the site or not.
By using a VPN, the player is violating the Terms of Service, which they acknowledge and confirm when registering, for example by checking the box "I have read and understood the Terms of Service."

The player's violation of the ToS entitles the casino to block/suspend their account, which will also hold up in court. What would not hold up, of course, are illegal clauses, but the prohibition of VPN use certainly does not fall under this category.

Before getting  married you need to talk about  your future financial arrangements with your intended spouse now.You can do this by considering some of these questions, Like how will our income be budgeted? Will we have a joint bank account or separate accounts? Which spouse will be more adept at keeping  financial records  and seeing that bills are paid? How much money can one of us spend on a purchase without consulting the other?
            So what's your suggestions or what's your take on this!

And as far as it's psuedo-anonymity, as I have said, transactions are public and it can be linked to you right away, everything is in addresses. But we all know that it can be traceable specially if you uses exchanges that mandated KYC.

It has become a normal thing for us to see Madrid go goalless in the first half of the game and I never for ones in the first half saw anything special or anything new from Madrid, at some point I was banking on Levante to score first but the visitors too weren't that coordinated to get the ball on target or worry the goalkeeper. Madrid are good but they have something that's holding them back from showing their full potential and believe me when I say this, if Madrid are to play Barcelona in their next game you'd see them coming all out like they want to roast Barcelona, at this point the don't want the league leaders to beat them again.

Where did you guys find this rule? I've never heard about it, and I just did a quick search and I couldn't find any result

And I really don't understand how it would work because it would impact the whole league, so everything would be frozen like it is, including qualification spots for European cups and relegations. And also the clubs would not play, that means they would have to arrange friendly matches in order to stay fit for the cup matches. And what about the fans? They pay season tickets for what?

Seriously guys, please post a link to this rule because it's very weird.