You are going a it off-topic, but are still wrong.
Even being involved in pyramid schemes can be valuable, althought in criminal way. In that case valuable is position, in which You have joined and which allows You to scam those other people, who lose money. Those positions have very high value for criminals, who are masterminds and early joiners into scheme.
Same goes for BTC scheme. What is most valuable in this scheme, is position of early miners, when "mining" could have called accordingly only because the mechanism of process was similar. Thore were essentially free "game coins", which also were valued accordingly 0,01 USD etc.
Of course, for Satoshi and other early miners "BTC scheme" was very valuable. But bitcoin - symbol/number/byte that is connected to the name of John Doe is not valuable because of that. This byte was just used as means to transfer value from pocket of John Doe to the pockets of Satoshi and early miners. Numbers couldn't provide them utility, which is why they used BTC scheme to get that utility in things they can eat, drink, wear, drive, sit on, enter into, please the aesthetic senses, legally enforce(fiat money), etc. Worthless numbers are left to people like you, who are as a result, forced to find value in valuelessness, by using a series of irrational excuses. Precicely and that is BTCs value for Satoshi and early miners! Now, there is not just Satoshi and early miners, but a group of relatively early miners, then mid-time miners and so on... For each of them BTC scheme scammed some money, therefore being valueable same was as to early miners, just in less amount. No, that is NOT BTCs value but manipulation's value. If you were tricked to give million dollars to a scammer who sold you an empty box because you were convinced it contains an expensive diamond, that does not mean that emptiness in the box has value. It just means you've been scammed. Or in other words, scam was the thing that had value, and not the subject of the scam (emptiness). Scamming object also has value according their scamming potential. Empty box with ALTCOIN logo on it and empty box with BTC logo on it have totally different scamming values, while BTC scams big time, many altcoins do very little. In this case, scamming object is not bitcoin but computers that store blockchain, and in that regard bitcoin owners do not own these computers like box would be owned in mentioned diamond scam. So, in the diamond scam you would at least have the box that can provide you with some utility. It the Bitcoin scam you are left with useless numbers that can provide zero utility. Not object, but subject. As for (scamming) value, they both have value - each coin itself and hardware, that accounts coins. Why coin? Because You need to "hand over" something to get money from Greater Fool. Let it be digital code. In BTC case, it is well promoted, branded and pumped piece of code! As we agreed few posts ago, value is subjective and therefore You can not tell, that BTC as an object has no value, because this statement is general. You may say, BTC has no value for You. If BTC as an object had no value universally, You could easily gather all BTCs into Your wallet for 1 dollar, because You would be paying more than, their value is. Well, it is false information what is "handed over" to get money from Greater Fool, and it is this information what has value to scamers. Thus, it is not number (BTC) what is well promoted, branded and pumped, but false information that BTC has value. Btw, I didn't say that value is subjective. I said that the degree of value is subjective. Net realizable value is the bigger, the more coins You have, so it depends on their quantity as much as on deceived value for each. If You agreed, that degree of value is subjective, then You basically agreed, that value is subjective. Because diminishing or growing degrees are at some point practically equal to zero or infinity at graph. Graph is just a mathematical abstraction that cannot chage the utility of a thing. So, the appeal to the graph is just one of those irrational excuses. |
? Не внушает доверия,еще столик этот дешманский-аля под IKEA,и блокнотик свой перекладывает постоянно.Нет,лучше уж Хамаху глянуть,общепризнанный эксперд,так сказать 
. Помню раньше и карьеры и соляные шахты городили, хоть поднять настроение можно было.
