What's your take on this?

You play on a casino, and it's supposedly "provably fair", however, you we're able to find a backdoor and exploit their system. Are you going to tell the casino itself or you will continue to play as it's free money and then you exit just about in time before the casino know what you have done?

Or take for example this case: Looking Back at the Ultimate Bet Scandal.

Trust me, you would only enjoy gambling for a while and afterwards, it will become very boring because, Agree with me or not, there is always a kind fun that us derived from knowing that you are very limited in finance and any mistake of gambling with an amount of money you can not afford to lose and then losing it, you and your family may go hungry, such knowledge help install a kind of fear of losing in you even though you are gambling for fun.

So, even while playing for fun, there is still that little fear of losing in us, and a small desire to win even though it's not really a priority, that is, even while gambling to simply have fun, a part of us still desire to win because in reality, there is actually no fun in losing money, and there is also a kind of joy and satisfaction we feel in our hearts when I know that we are still lucky..

So with infinite money, I doubt anyone will still enjoy gambling except when you play against friends to beat them.

So Liverpool are really looking for a new striker to replace Mo Salah in the future because it is predicted that Mo Salah will retire next season or the following season it's just that I was a bit surprised that Luis Diaz was released and I can't imagine how strong Liverpool would be if they really brought in Isak, Liverpool will probably be the team that spends the most in this transfer window.

There is nothing wrong with a guy who might choose to set aside other funds for buying the dip.  That is not really called diversification, even though it is employing more than one method for accumulating bitcoin that might result in accumulating more cash if the BTC price does not dip.

Let''s say that we have a guy with a $50k per year income, and he is investing $200 per week into bitcoin.  That would be $10k per year and that would be right around 25% of the guys income going into bitcoin investment.  Maybe if he already had been buying bitcoin for a full year, then he has $10k worth of bitcoin and whatever  amount that his bitcoin holdings had appreciated during the time that he had been accumulating it.  There are websites that we can look up the numbers to make sure our hypothetical is realistic... so maybe this guy has 0.14507 BTC after one year of $200 per week.

So then how much is the raise? Did he go from $50k to $60k or maybe from $50k to $55k?  The extra amount or some proportion of the extra amount could be set aside for buying the dip, as you mentioned. I am not sure if there is any compelling case to be made for doing it or not doing it (except that in the case that I described, the guy is already allocating a pretty high percentage of his income to bitcoin investing.. and so hopefully he has already established an emergency fund, or maybe he might need to spend some of his income or the bonus money to shore up his emergency funds).  No matter the case, bitcoin investors can decide these kinds of balances of their income and their extra income.

There are many countries placing ban on gambling operations in their country on both online and offline, for either religious reasons or as measure towards curbing gambling addiction. But is it making result? while several other countries are rather lifting their bans with less restrictive regulatory policies.

If there's any government officials reading this, it is important you all understand that the ban doesn't in anyway stopped your citizens from still accessing these gambling platforms online with their phones either through VPN. And this evening makes the citizens risk losing their money to the casino whose ToS is against the use of VPN. Your citizens now lose more to these casinos without the country receiving any royalties as revenue raising. Invariably, it all ends in favour of the casinos at the end of it all. Because you can't really stop your citizens from gambling at this digital age, except you plan on manning one policeman to a citizen 😜 , which is not possible.

There are modern better ways to fight gambling addiction such as which I have proposed in my opinion:
> Regularly educating your citizens on national TV programmes about the negatives of compulsive gambling. You can be sponsoring these programmes through the revenues accrued from taxes paid by these gambling companies. Or these companies could as well partner with initiatives and sponsor it.

> Provide skills acquisitions programmes and avenues of adequate job opportunities, because a lot of young people trooping into gambling are doing so as a result of a lack of sustainable means of income which makes them to see gambling is the all embracing means to make money.

Honestly, it would be really perfect as MetaWin keeps a close-knit community. Sadly, according from Queen, their license doesn't cover such.


https://discord.com/channels/1015884443606593566/1015884444395130882/1395841738769174688


https://discord.com/channels/1015884443606593566/1015884444395130882/1395842230681600101

But I would still keep the suggestion coming as Skel might do something about it as he sees more demand grows. Perhaps he could discuss it with his legal team, at least.

Even on youtube and on other crypto forums, this is what they also are saying. They put this message everywhere and it gives hope to people who just come in to buy BTC. It may really happen or it may not. It gives us something to piece together information while we are seeing more.

The one thing  that almost make them sure of what BTC might in the next few months is because of the assets management coming to buy.

This is not the first time the owners of Ripple have been cashing out. CEO Brad Garlinghouse was accused of selling about $150 million worth of XRP from 2017 to 2020. Other co-fouhders such as Chris Larsen have sold off close to $450 million in time past. The constant movement and sales of XRP by these creators shows that their motives is just to acquire wealth. Bitcoin was not created for selfish interest rather it's focus is to foster decentralization and give people an alternative to fiat. Bitcoin has no competition because it it doesn't have thesame goals like altcoins.