Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2025, 06:50:04 PM *
News: Pizza day contest voting
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
 1 
 on: Today at 06:50:02 PM 
Started by Mansory22022 - Last post by Orluemma
Retail buying gold and banks selling them to buy crypto.
Gold is useless for banks in the new financial system gold is not corruption free like btc or crypto there is no actual track of gold how much gold is minted and controlled so bankers don't need gold they need btc and crypto.
Retail buying gold so bankers selling gold and buying crypto.
The biggest secret is that banks buying crypto a lot not gold the gold is for retail buyers.

Even If gold have utility and use case then corporations want to buy gold for cheap off course they do that when gold crashing while btc and crypto will go up.
All this gold shilling what's going on is just for bankers to get rid of their gold and buy btc you see brics nations buying up gold so that gomex of western countries can use gold futures to manipulate gold price up without even buying gold with eur usd or gbp currency.

Gold now is biggest dump project on the silly retail traders with the help of india and china together with wall street and western bankers.


Honestly, I think what’s happening with central banks and financial institutions selling gold to the public is kind of revealing. It’s not just about gold as an investment—it’s about trust.

Central banks usually guard their gold like a dragon guards treasure, right? But now, some of them are quietly allowing regular people to access tiny slices of that same gold. Coins, bars, digital tokens, gold-backed bonds whatever form it takes, the message is the same:

“We know people are worried about inflation, about weak currencies, about instability… so here’s a more solid option.”


It’s not them dumping gold or trying to get rid of it. In fact, many central banks are buying more gold behind the scenes. What they’re doing is kind of strategic—they’re giving the public access to gold as a safety valve. It’s like saying:

 “We still control the system, but if you need to protect yourself, here’s something trusted.”


To me, that’s powerful. Gold isn’t just an ancient relic anymore. It’s becoming relevant again not as the main currency, but as a quiet backup. A side-door out of a failing system.

And you can see the shift happening especially in countries with economic trouble Turkey, Zimbabwe, Nigeria, India. In those places, people don’t want to hold cash anymore. They trust gold more than their own currency. And governments are realizing it’s better to let them hold gold, in a controlled way, than to push them toward dollars or crypto.

So my take?

If you’re in a country where inflation is rising or the local currency is shaky, owning some gold makes sense—even just a gram at a time.

But be smart. Don’t just buy anything that says “gold.” Look into how it’s stored, if you can redeem it, how easy it is to sell later.

And finally this might be a sign that the world is slowly drifting away from total faith in fiat money. Not overnight, but step by step. And that’s worth paying attention to.

 2 
 on: Today at 06:50:01 PM 
Started by Popkon6 - Last post by serjent05
This is a great news that more and more institutions are accumulating Bitcoin.  From the news I saw they are flexing their gain which is very good indeed since it hype the market.  But I am wondering what would be the scenario and the statement of these company once the Bitcoin bull run transitions to a bear market.  Would they liquidate their stash?  Or they will keep on accumulating?  Does Metaplanet have any statement on what would be their plan when Bitcoin price dip during the bear market? Would they continue to accumulate?

 3 
 on: Today at 06:49:57 PM 
Started by Leclerc2019 - Last post by shohag999
Week # 8: (10.06 - 16.06)
Twitter Profile Link: https://x.com/Ariyan431
Followers: 10610
Spreadsheet #: 157
Retweet
1.https://x.com/Ariyan431/status/1932176181379715125
2.https://x.com/Ariyan431/status/1934170909017067814
3.https://x.com/Ariyan431/status/1934170855116079540
4.https://x.com/Ariyan431/status/1934315783414559102
5.https://x.com/Ariyan431/status/1934680582761664759
Tweet
1.https://x.com/Ariyan431/status/1934682395682459922

Week # 8: (10.06 - 16.06)
Telegram Profile Link: https://t.me/shohag410
Spreadsheet #: 67
Amount of posts per week:
1.https://t.me/BitCoinBit_BCB/37351
2.https://t.me/BitCoinBit_BCB/37352
3.https://t.me/BitCoinBit_BCB/37503
4.https://t.me/BitCoinBit_BCB/37544
5.https://t.me/BitCoinBit_BCB/37547


 4 
 on: Today at 06:48:58 PM 
Started by Terratoshi - Last post by Terratoshi
Thank you all again for continuing this conversation. I truly value the time and thoughts you've shared.

Some of you asked: 
“Why do I need your certificate if I already hold Bitcoin?” 
You don’t. And that’s precisely the point.

The blockchain already proves everything. 
This is not about proving ownership. It’s about **feeling** it.

We celebrate Genesis Block even though it's just block 0. 
We quote Laszlo’s pizza like scripture, even though it was just lunch. 
We’re human — we build culture around code.

Calling this idea a “poetic gesture” wasn’t meant as a joke — 
it was honest. 
Not every tool must be practical. Some are symbolic. 
Some are for memory, meaning, or momentum.

Bitcoin is digital sovereignty. 
But sovereignty includes identity. And for some, this symbolic deed adds depth to that identity. 
We’re not selling land. We’re not issuing tokens. 
We're simply offering a moment of reflection.

If Bitcoin is the protocol, maybe this is the **pause** between blocks. 
A space to feel something before we continue forward.

Whether you see it or not, I’m thankful you’re engaging. 
Because it proves one thing: 
Bitcoin is not just math. It’s a movement.

— Terratoshi

 5 
 on: Today at 06:48:11 PM 
Started by Wind_FURY - Last post by cxtreenal
There have been lots of discussions regarding how we could handle our investment by the help of an emergency fund, so that we may not run into an unforeseen circumstance being forfeiting our investment and sell, that is why it is preferred that for a long time investors, we must be able to understand the reason why we should be a holder and for how long we can hold before selling, then anything that has to do with an emergency fund be dealt with separately without causing alterations to our investment, just try to scroll up on some pages to read more on emergency fund.
I think most long-term investors for Bitcoin have begun to understand this and if there are some who do not understand such things, maybe they are new investors who are looking for suitable ways and methods to make long-term investments in Bitcoin. Because those who are still relatively new to investing in Bitcoin must at least understand how to separate emergency funds from funds that will be used to buy Bitcoin because it is to make their own investments smoother and not disturbed by anything.
Bitcoin investment requires a steady source of discretionary income to keep it on a smooth path for a long time. Having that source allows you to target your investments in a planned manner. Long-term goals can be a bit of a daunting prospect for new investors, but a steady source of income teaches them to master the strategy and makes them realize the need for an emergency fund. Bitcoin teaches them how to hold and accumulation through volatile prices.

Among the strategies for finding the right path and investing, if the new investor can master the DCA strategy, they will continue to push their savings far and wide along the smooth way.

 6 
 on: Today at 06:47:50 PM 
Started by Trofo - Last post by Alpha Marine
Right bro. Manchester City's overall performance last season was very shaky. Also City's match strategy was also weak in the middle of the season. Several Manchester City's key players suffered injuries like Rodri and de bruyne, at the same time Guardiola's mental health was probably not good. Even so, Haaland scored 22 goals and 3 assists this season. This is not necessarily a bad performance. Manchester City failed this season. But Haaland was quite successful personally. Haaland managed to score 22 goals last season despite not getting enough support from the midfielders.

I think Haaland is a victim of his own brilliance. If any of the strikers in Manchester United or Chelsea scores 22 goals in the league alone, they will be hailed as one of the best of the season, but Haaland is a player who has been outdoing that, so the season he doesn't, it looks like he was bad. Then, to add to it all, Manchester City were very bad this season.

A player can have a good individual season while his team has a bad season. Like Mbappe for example, he was good on individual level, but as a team, they were shit. I think it's the same with Haaland, even tho Mbappe had a way better season than Haaland.
I think if Manchester City are in good form next season, Haaland will outscore everybody in the league.

 7 
 on: Today at 06:47:46 PM 
Started by Kavelj22 - Last post by Emylion
I don't like having children. It's easy and doesn't require much philosophizing and interpretation. For this reason, most of my relationships with women have failed to develop into a formal relationship. For me, marriage is all about finding a true life partner to share our ups and downs, and that's enough. Just as I don't like to be tied down to someone who is too attached to her family, I also don't like having children who might one day tire me out or whose rights I might have neglected. Don't call me a "pessimist," because I know circumstances change, and what's best for me today isn't guaranteed tomorrow, no matter how many guarantees there are. These are personal beliefs and preferences, and unfortunately, it doesn't seem like there are women who share my perspective, and most, if not all, consider marriage as a means of procreation.

Are there women who share this perspective? Where or how can I find one? (I know this is bitcointalk not tinder hhh). Why should the concept of commitment extend to procreation as if it were a natural outcome when we are the ones who decide that?

Btw, i live in arabic country with conservative culture. Marriage and having children is a must for everybody and people don't even dare to discuss such topics. What do you think guys?
Hmm this post is really something else, are you an anti christ? It's only an impotent that can make sure post, like do you know the joy on seeing kids jumping up and down your home? House rather because it's kids and wife that makes home but with this post it seems you ain't ready for a home, like my best advice to you is to make an absolute turnover on this you post.

 8 
 on: Today at 06:47:32 PM 
Started by cygan - Last post by Black Mbaye
I can say that was an easy win for PSG -- not as tough as what I thought I'd be btw. Atletico have lost their value and that has affected them big time, even in big games like this.... Man, this is just the group stage of the competition and the first game for them, but they've conceived 4 goals already....

....

atletico played extremely poorly in yesterday's match. honestly i didn't expect that a team sitting in the top three of la liga could perform so badly. they looked frustrated, disorganized, and overly emotional throughout the game. on the other hand, PSG played on a completely different level, aggressive, tactical, and disciplined-- they took full advantage of atletico's mentality. and what's worse, botafogo has already secured three points in this group stage, while atletico remains at the bottom with zero points. it's honestly embarrassing for a club of their stature.
Lol, Is this Spanish La Liga that because Athletico finished 3rd they can't lose this game? This is FIFA club world cup another competition for that matter and not La Liga, their finishing 3rd won't really determine the outcome of the game. And remember they played against PSG the current European champions that destroyed Inter Milan in the champions league final and you expect them not to win ATM?
PSG just proved they are still the champions and it was a clear thrashing.
Atletico Madrid could not show any presence against Paris Saint-Germain, but he cannot blame them for that. Because Paris Saint-Germain is one of the teams that is European champions and has the best players in the world. Atletico Madrid consists of good players but they are not as good as Paris Saint-Germain. They may also not be mentally ready for the tournament. Because many players are still in holiday mode. They may not have seen it as a serious match.

 9 
 on: Today at 06:47:21 PM 
Started by Unitedbountycommunity1 - Last post by Radityadigka
#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Week 4: (16/06/2025_22/06/2025)
Forum Username: Radityadigka
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3428426
Telegram Username: @Radityadigka6
Participated Campaigns: Article,
Trc20 address  TSN4MkXsGiijrr1fnds8iSRnN2emTi6ecs

 10 
 on: Today at 06:46:53 PM 
Started by cygan - Last post by mv1986
I can say that was an easy win for PSG -- not as tough as what I thought I'd be btw. Atletico have lost their value and that has affected them big time, even in big games like this.... Man, this is just the group stage of the competition and the first game for them, but they've conceived 4 goals already....

....

atletico played extremely poorly in yesterday's match. honestly i didn't expect that a team sitting in the top three of la liga could perform so badly. they looked frustrated, disorganized, and overly emotional throughout the game. on the other hand, PSG played on a completely different level, aggressive, tactical, and disciplined-- they took full advantage of atletico's mentality. and what's worse, botafogo has already secured three points in this group stage, while atletico remains at the bottom with zero points. it's honestly embarrassing for a club of their stature.
Lol, Is this Spanish La Liga that because Athletico finished 3rd they can't lose this game? This is FIFA club world cup another competition for that matter and not La Liga, their finishing 3rd won't really determine the outcome of the game. And remember they played against PSG the current European champions that destroyed Inter Milan in the champions league final and you expect them not to win ATM?
PSG just proved they are still the champions and it was a clear thrashing.

And I think that Enrique made very clear to the team that this is not just a secondary title. He wants to add this to his collection and become the first coach ever to win this premier tournament. Understandable I think. PSG has been waiting for international trophies for a very long time, they already made history and if they can now put this title on top so to say, there is not much more they could have hoped for.

Is there any title PSG didn't win this season? Anything nationally? They won the Coup de France, Ligue 1 of course, Champions League, what else could they have won?

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!